Skip to main content

Case Record For:

97-1723-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: MCIMETRO ACCESS/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 12/30/1997
Date Closed: 5/5/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/22/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech's September 22, 1999 motions to renew the protective orders in Case Nos. 97-1557-TP-CSS, 97-1723-TP-CSS, and 96-336-TP-CSS are granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Div- ision of the Commission should continue to maintain under seal the information that is currently under seal in these dockets. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/15/1999In the Matter of the complaint of MCI Metro Access Transmission Services Inc. (vs) Ameritech OHio (10 pgs)10
09/22/1999Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
08/02/1999Supreme Court Papers. (10 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1241)10
07/02/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (33 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1241)33
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry on rehearing denying the application for rehearing by Ameritech; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding (19).14
04/16/1999Revised arbitration decision filed on behalf of MCImetro by J. Sanders. (17 pgs.)17
03/29/1999Response to comments of MCImetro Transmission Services, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (46 pgs.)46
03/29/1999Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Reply comments to Ameritech Ohio's initial comments on the effect of the FCC's February 26, 1999, declaratory ruling on the decision in this case, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access by J. Sanders. (21 pgs.)21
03/29/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (58 pgs.)58
03/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.)30
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission by J. Sanders. (135 pgs.)135
03/05/1999Entry ordering that comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on March 19, 1999; reply comments are to be filed by March 29, 1999. (AE) (3 pgs.) Service notice 3 pags.3
02/26/1999Motion for leave to file comments and memorandun in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
02/05/1999Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (15 pgs.)15
12/10/1998Entry ordering that the rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission more time to consider the arguments raised in the application for rehearing. (2 pgs.)2
11/23/1998Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing and temporary stay, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Trans mission by J. Sanders and J. Van Duzer. (13 pgs.)13
11/23/1998FCC's response as amicus curiae in BellSouth Telecommuni- cations, Inc. v. US LEC of North Carolina L.L.C. and the North Carolina Public Utilities Commission Civil Action No. 3: 98CV170-MU, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access by J. Sanders. (8 pgs.)8
11/23/1998Opposition to application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
11/13/1998Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order filed by D. Conaway and M. Mulcahy. (49 pgs)49
10/22/1998Notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
10/14/1998Opinion & Order that MCIm's complaint against Ameritech is sustained; that Ameritech pay to MCIm the reciprocal com- pensation payments held in escrow as directed in this order, and continue to pay reciprocal compensation in accordance with the interconnection agreement and this order. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Donald L. Mason. (12 pgs.)12
10/13/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Kahn and D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.)3
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
08/21/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (11 pgs.)11
08/11/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (8 pgs.)8
08/06/1998Memorandum in support of Time Warner's motion for consoli- dation, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (3 pgs.)3
08/04/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum in opposition to motion to consolidate of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum in opposition to motion to consolidate of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Reply of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority, filed by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
07/29/1998Response to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
07/27/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
07/22/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (32 pgs.)32
07/21/1998Motion to consolidate and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
06/26/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (62 pgs.)62
06/22/1998Update to the record, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Sanders. (29 pgs.)29
06/12/1998Motion to preclude Ameritech Ohio's submission of a surreply brief and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by M. Rockey Schermer and R. Sugarman. (6 pgs.)6
06/08/1998Reply brief of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and J. Van Duzer. (13 pgs)13
06/08/1998Reply brief of amicus curiae Time Warner Communications of Ohio filed by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (69 pgs)69
06/08/1998Post-hearing reply brief filed by M. Stemm on behalf of Ameritech. (30 pgs.)30
06/08/1998Response brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of United Telephone and Sprint Communications by W.W. Walston and L.T. Lauridsen. (7 pgs)7
05/27/1998Letter notifying the Commission that Amicus Curiae Time Warner Communications of Ohio will not be filing an initial brief in this proceeding, filed by R. Sugarman. (1 pg.)1
05/27/1998Initial brief of amicus curiae ICG Telecom Group, Inc. in support of complaint of MCImetro Access Transmission Serv- ices, Inc. filed by B. Ferris. (4 pgs)4
05/27/1998Motion of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. for leave to be granted amicus curiae status filed by B. Ferris and M. Shor. (8 pgs)4
05/27/1998Initial post-hearing brief of Ameritech Ohio filed by D. Conway and M. Mulcahy. (53 pgs)53
05/27/1998Initial brief of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and J. Duzer. (67 pgs)67
05/26/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 5/12/98, (DN), 18 pgs., Submitted. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)18
05/26/1998Brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (6 pgs.)6
05/22/1998Amicus curiae post hearing brief filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by W. Walston; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (16 pgs.)16
05/19/1998Confidential Ameritech Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2 filed with transcript of hearing held 5/5/98. (62 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)62
05/19/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 5/5/98, (DN), 55 pgs., Con't. (Volume I) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)55
05/08/1998Rebuttal testimony of Dennis L. Ricca on behalf of MCI Telecommunication Corp and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc., filed by J. Sanders. (14 pgs)14
05/04/1998Entry ordering that the motions to intervene filed by Time Warner, TCG, and Sprint are denied and those parties, along with AOL, are granted amicus curiae status in this case. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
04/30/1998Motion for practice before the Commission filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (3 pgs.)3
04/30/1998Reply to Ameritech's memorandum in response, filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
04/29/1998Confidential direct testimony of Suzanne J. Springsteen and confidential direct testimony of Eric Panfil filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (62 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)62
04/29/1998Direct testimony of Dennis L. Ricca filed on behalf of com- plainants, MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders. (68 pgs.)68
04/29/1998Direct testimony of Eric Panfil filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (48 pgs.)48
04/29/1998Direct testimony of Ms. Emily E. Binder filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Com- munications Co. by B. Donahue. (16 pgs.)16
04/29/1998Direct testimony of Suzanne J. Springsteen filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (9 pgs.)9
04/29/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
04/28/1998Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P.'s reply to Ameri- tech Ohio's supplemental memorandum contra Time Warner's motion to intervene, filed by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (4 pgs.)4
04/24/1998Ameritech Ohio's supplemental memorandum contra Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P.'s Motion to Intervene. Filed by: M. Stemm. (3 pgs.)3
04/23/1998Memorandum contra United Telephone Company of Ohio and Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s motion to intervene, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
04/21/1998Memorandum in response to TCG Ohio's limited intervention motion, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
04/16/1998Reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarmann. (4 pgs.)4
04/16/1998Letter stating that MCImetro Access supports the partici- pation of Time Warner Communications, United Telephone Company dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co., America Online and TCG Ohio, and urges the Commission to grant the motions for intervention, filed by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
04/13/1998Motion for leave to participate and file its position paper as an amicus curiae, memorandum in support, proof of ser- vice, and position paper on reciprocal compensation filed on behalf of American Online, Inc. by Y. Dori. (16 pgs.)16
04/13/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by W. Walston. (5 pgs.)5
04/10/1998Motion for limited intervention and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
04/07/1998Memorandum contra Time Warner Communications of Ohio's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
03/27/1998Response of MCImetro Access Transmission Services to Time Warner's petition for intervention, filed by J. Sanders. (5 pgs.)5
03/23/1998Motion of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. to intervene filed by R. Sugarman, M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
03/10/1998Entry ordering that reasonable grounds for complaint have been stated; that parties comply with procedural schedule set forth in Finding 5; that responses to written discovery requests be provided within 5 business days of service of the written discovery request; intervention requests be received on or before 4/13/98; discovery shall be completed on or before 4/23/98; direct, expert testimony shall be filed no later than 4/29/98; evidentiary hearing be held 5/5/98, 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (GP) (3 pgs)3
02/03/1998Answer and affirmative defenses filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
01/20/1998Request for a 14 day extension of time in which to file its answer, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
12/31/1997Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)1
12/30/1997In the matter of the complaint of MCImetro Access Trans- mission Services, Inc. (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged and unreasonable violation of the interconnec- tion agreement. (29 pgs.)29