Case Record For: 96-1416-TP-AEC File a Public Comment Case Title: AMERITECH OHIO/BASF CORP. Status: AR-Archived Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE Purpose Code: AEC-Application to revise or cancel a contract Date Opened: 12/30/1996 Date Closed: 6/18/1998 Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 12 of 12 documents 1 / 1 Date FiledSummaryPages 06/18/1998Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.)7 06/11/1998AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5 06/01/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (7 pgs.)7 04/30/1998Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.)9 04/09/1998Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.)5 03/26/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.)7 03/16/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (30 pgs.)30 02/12/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal in these cases pur- suant to the directions given in Finding 12; that Ameri- tech's motions seeking to extend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Finding 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings in this entry do not affect the sus- pension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.)10 02/25/1997Memo automatically approving the application as of 1/29/97; case shall remain open pending decision on protective order.1 12/30/1996Confidential portion of contract between Ameritech Ohio and BASF Corp., filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)5 12/30/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7 12/30/1996In the matter of the redacted version of a contract for Ameritech ValueLink Plus Service between Ameritech Ohio and BASF Corporation. (4 pgs.)4 1 / 1 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: Fenlon,Mary K.