Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-1402-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: WILLIAM MCKENNEY/GTE/CBT/AMERITECH
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 6/28/2022
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
07/28/2009 Memo requesting case be closed and archived effective 07/28/09.
11/24/2000 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Donald Werring.
10/31/2000 Correspondence letters requesting the PUCO to review this case, filed by various consumers. (16 pgs.)
10/26/2000 Entry denying the application for rehearing; that this matter be dismissed and closed of record; that the motion to extend time filed by Cincinnati Bell is denied.
10/19/2000 Request fo rrehearing filed by Nancy Montgomery. (2 pgs.)
10/19/2000 Request for rehearing filed by Kenneth Staker. (1 pg.)
10/19/2000 Request for rehearing, filed by Shannon VanWinkle. (2 pgs.)
10/18/2000 Letter to Commission relative to EAS to the Georgetown/Cincinnati area by M. Eugene Hamilton.
10/18/2000 Entry granting rehearing.
10/18/2000 Entry granting rehearing for the sole purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the merits of the complainants' application for rehearing and the respondents' memorandum contra.
10/18/2000 Entry ordering that the rehearing in this matter is granted for the sole purpose of providing the Commission additional time to consider the merits of the complainants' application for rehearing and the respondents' memoranda contra. (3 pgs.)
10/16/2000 Memorandum contra to the application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Wentz. (4 pgs.)
10/16/2000 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Gary Utter. (1 pg.)
10/10/2000 Letter requesting a rehearing of the case denying the 378 exchange's flat-rate extended calling plan on 8/24/2000. Filed by V. Lewis (21 pgs)
10/10/2000 Correspondence letter filed by D. Utter (1 pg)
10/06/2000 Letter regarding some major concerns on the EAS issue. Filed by, State Senator D. White (25 pgs)
10/04/2000 Reply to supplemental information response of Verizon North, Inc., filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (4 pgs.)
10/04/2000 Motion for extension of time to file memorandum contra complainants' application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (4 pgs.)
10/03/2000 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Donna Wood. (2 pgs.)
10/03/2000 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Sharon Richmond. (1 pg.) (filed 9/29/00)
09/29/2000 Response letter to the 378 exchange toll free extended area service. Filed by S. Richmond (1 pg)
09/29/2000 Letter requesting a rehearing of the case denying the 378 exchange's flat-rate extended calling plan on 8/24/2000. Filed by V. Lewis (1 pg)
09/29/2000 Memorandum contra to application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Verizon North by W. Keating.
09/22/2000 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Cost information filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (4 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (28 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by W. McKenney. (27 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Cost information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., by J. Harrison. (3 pgs.)
09/22/2000 Cost information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison.
09/07/2000 Entry Nunc Pro Tunc ordering that the August 24, 2000 Opinion & Order is amended nunc pro tunc in accordance with Finding 2.
08/24/2000 Opinion & Order that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Georgetown Exchange and the Aber- deen, Bethany, Bethel, Cincinnati, Clermont, Decatur, Hamil- ton, Little Miami, Mowrystown, Newtonsville, Williamsburg, and Fayetteville exchanges is denied; that two-way, non- optional, measured-rate EAS between the Georgetown Exchange and the Bethel, Cincinnati, and Clermont exchanges is grant- ed, contingent upon the review of cost data to be provided by GTE and Cincinnati Bell; that Ameritech and Little Miami are dismissed as parties to this proceeding; that GTE and Cincinnati Bell file within 60 days of this order cost data for implementing two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Georgetown Exchange and the Bethel, Cincinnati, and Clermont exchanges in the format set forth in this order. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Graig A. Glazer. (40 pgs.)
08/24/2000 Opinion and order that GTE and Cincinnati Bell may file within 30 days a statement that neither exceptionally high costs nor exceptionally heavy investments in facilities would be required to provide measured-rate EAS.
08/07/2000 Correspondence letter filed by Senator D. White.
08/07/2000 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by State Representative Rose Vesper. (1 pg.)
08/07/2000 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Representative Rose Vesper. (1 pg.)
08/07/2000 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Senator Doug White. (1 pg.)
06/19/2000 Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. Miles.
03/20/2000 Evidence (exhibits) filed. (FILED 12/99)
03/07/2000 Reply to respondents' briefs, filed on behalf of complain- ants by W. McKenney. (21 pgs.)
03/07/2000 Reply to respondents briefs, filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKinney.
02/22/2000 Reply to petitioner's brief filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (9 pgs.)
02/22/2000 Brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (6 pgs.)
02/22/2000 Brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.
02/22/2000 Brief filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating.
02/22/2000 Brief filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keat- ing. (16 pgs.)
02/22/2000 Answer brief filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Communications Corp., by T. Mazzola. (4 pgs.)
02/22/2000 Reply to petitioners brief, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by R. Shank.
02/22/2000 Answer brief filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation's by T. Lodge.
02/18/2000 Information response regarding calling statistics, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by E. King.
02/08/2000 Reply to memorandum contra cost studies, filed on behalf of complainant by W. McKenney. (12 pgs.)
02/08/2000 Reply to memorandum contra cost studies filed on behalf of complainant by W. McKenney.
02/01/2000 Brief filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (33 pgs.)
02/01/2000 Memorandum contra motion to request cost information, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (6 pgs.)
02/01/2000 Memorandum contra complainant's motion to request cost information, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (6 pgs.)
02/01/2000 Memorandum contra motion to request cost information, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.
02/01/2000 Memorandum contra complainant's motion to request for cost information, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by R. Shank.
01/28/2000 Memorandum in response to motion to request cost information, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.
01/28/2000 Memorandum in response to motion to request cost infor- mation, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (4 pgs.)
01/25/2000 Memorandum contra complainant's request for cost studies argument, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)
01/12/2000 Motion to request cost information and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (8 pgs.)
01/12/2000 Motion to request cost information, filed by complainant D. McKenney.
01/02/2000 Brief filed by complainant W. McKenney.
12/27/1999 Transcript filed for hearing held December 10, 1999, (DJ), 122 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume II)
12/16/1999 Memorandum contra complainant's request for cost studies agreement, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications by T. Mazzola.
12/16/1999 Response filed on behalf of GTE North by P. Cook.
12/16/1999 Response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by P. Cook. (1 pg.)
12/16/1999 Entry ordering that the parties may file briefs; the com- plainants shall serve and file their bried by February 1, 2000; the respondents may serve and file an answer brief by February 22, 2000; the complainants may serve and file a reply brief by March 7, 2000; the motion for cost studies shall be served upon all parties and filed by January 12, 2000; memoranda contra shall be served and filed by Febru- ary 1, 2000; complainants reply shall be filed within seven days of service of the memoranda contra. (AE) (3 pgs.)
11/15/1999 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Representative Rob Portman. (1 pg.)
11/02/1999 Entry ordering that the conclusion of the hearing in this proceeding shall begin on Friday, December 10, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)
11/01/1999 Transcript filed for hearing held 10/7/99, (LDJ), 277 pgs. (Georgetown, Ohio)
10/06/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Warren County)
10/04/1999 Memorandum contra complainants' motion to compel response and discovery and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation by G. Cooper.
10/04/1999 Memorandum contra complainants' motion to compel response and discovery and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications by G. Cooper (5 pgs)
10/01/1999 Testimony of Mitchell R. Proctor filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.)
10/01/1999 Entry ordering that, in accordance with Finding 8, the motion to compel filed by the complainants on September 27, 1999, is granted in part and denied in part. (AE) (4 pgs.)
09/30/1999 Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (18 pgs.)
09/30/1999 Testimony of Jacqueline M. Young filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (17 pgs.)
09/30/1999 Direct testimony of Evelyn W. King filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by E. King. (15 pgs.)
09/28/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Clermont County)
09/27/1999 Motion of complainants to compel response and discovery and request for expedited ruling, filed by W. McKenney. (20 pgs.)
09/23/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Clermont County)
09/22/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Adams County)
09/21/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Hamilton County)
09/20/1999 Response to complainants' 9/1/99 discovery request, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (6 pgs.)
09/01/1999 Legal Notice faxed to: Peoples Defender ( Adams Co.); News Democrat (Brown Co.); Journal News (Butler Co.); Clermont Community (Clermont Co.);Cincinnati Enquirer (Hamilton Co.); Western Star (Warren Co.)
08/30/1999 Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on October 7, 1999 at the Adams-Brown County Economic Opportunities Building, Georgetown, Ohio; that any person or entity re- questing intervention do so by September 23, 1999; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony comply with Rule 4901-1-29(A)(1)(j), O.A.C. (AE) (4 pgs.)
02/18/1999 Information response, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation by G. Cooper.
02/18/1999 Information response filed by G. Cooper on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation. (5 pgs)
02/18/1999 Information response filed by E. King on behalf of Cincin- nati Bell Telephone Company. (55 pgs)
02/17/1999 Second information response of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.
02/17/1999 Second information response filed by W. Keating on behalf of GTE North. (42 pgs)
02/16/1999 Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders.
02/16/1999 Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders.
02/16/1999 Entry ordering that the complainants' application for rehearing is denied and that this matter is dismissed and closed of record; that the motion to extend time filed by Cincinnati Bell is denied.
02/16/1999 Affidavit filed by J. Sanders on behalf of MCI WorldCom. (1 pg)
02/16/1999 Affidavit filed by J. Sanders on behalf of MCI. (1 pg)
02/09/1999 Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty.
02/09/1999 Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by E. Finnerty. (4 pgs.)
02/08/1999 Affidavit filed on behalf of LCI International by K. Logue.
02/08/1999 Affidavit of Kim Logue filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by K. Logue. (2 pgs.)
01/21/1999 Affidavit of GTE Communications Corp. filed by G. Cooper.
01/21/1999 Affidavit of GTE Communications Corp. filed by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.)
01/19/1999 Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. Miles. (2 pgs.)
01/06/1999 Entry ordering that the motion of Ameritech for an order relieving it of the requirement to file calling rate data is granted; that GTELD shall be granted until January 25, 1999, to provide calling data to the respondents pursuant to the attorney examiner's entry issued December 4, 1998. (AE)
01/06/1999 Entry ordering that the motion of Ameritech for an order relieving it of the requirement to file calling data is granted; that GTELD shall be granted until January 25, 1999 to provide calling data to the respondents pursuant to the attorney examiner's entry issued December 4, 1998. (AE) (3 pgs.)
12/28/1998 Motion of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, for an order relieving it of the requirement to file calling rate data, filed by C. Rawlings. (4 pgs.)
12/28/1998 Motion of GTE Communications Corp. dba GTE Long Distance, respondent, for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed by G. Cooper. (7 pgs.)
12/04/1998 Entry stating that complainants motion to defer the filing of cost data is granted; that AT&T, MCI, LCI (or Qwest), Sprint, Worldcom, GTELD, and CBLD shall provide the information required by Finding 19 on or before 1/19/99; that GTE, Cincinnati Bell, Little Miami, and Ameritech provide the information required in Finding 22; in accordance with Finding 23 the complainants' requests for additional information are denied except to the extent contained in this entry. (DJ) (13 pgs)
04/20/1998 Response of GTE North to motion of complainants to request additional information, recompute calling rates, and compel response, filed by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)
04/02/1998 Memorandum contra a portion of motion of complainants to request additional information, recompute calling rates and compel response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)
03/24/1998 Motion to request additional information, recompute calling rates and compel response and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (6 pgs.)
10/21/1997 Reply to responses of GTE North, Little Miami Communications and Ameritech Ohio to motion of the complainants to compel response and to request additional information, filed on behalf of complainants by W. McKenney. (6 pgs.)
10/10/1997 Motion of the complainants for extension of time filed by W. McKenney. (4 pgs.)
09/29/1997 Response to motion of the complainants to compel response and to request additional information, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (7 pgs.)
09/26/1997 Memorandum in opposition to motion of the complainants to compel response and to request additional information, filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Communications, by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)
09/25/1997 Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio in response to motions of complainants filed by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)
09/10/1997 Motion of complainants to proceed with community of interest hearing and to hold filing of cost data until after said hearing and memorandum in support filed by W. McKenney. (6 pgs.)
09/10/1997 Motion of complainants to compel response and to request additional information and memorandum in support filed by W. McKenney. (7 pgs.)
06/20/1997 Entry ordering that GTE's motion for a waiver of the requirement to file cost data is granted; that, as to all other respondents in this proceeding, the require- ment to file cost data shall be waived until further notice. (AE) (2 pgs.)
06/09/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cin- cinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (56 pgs.)
06/09/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (59 pgs.)
06/09/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Telephone Communications Corp., by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)
06/09/1997 Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)
06/04/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.) (FILED 6/3/97)
06/02/1997 Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders filed on behalf of MCI Tele- communications Corp. by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)
05/20/1997 Entry ordering that the settlement conference in this matter is rescheduled for June 30, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. (AE) (2 pgs)
05/08/1997 Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. (2 pgs.)
05/06/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (28 pgs.)
05/06/1997 Entry ordering that the motions to extend time filed by Sprint and MCI are granted; that Sprint and MCI shall be granted until May 9, 1997, to provide to GTE, Cincinnati Bell, and Little Miami the information requested in Finding 3 of the entry issued February 7, 1997, in this case; that Sprint and MCI file affidavits by May 13, 1997, verifying that the requested information has been submitted to GTE, Cincinnati Bell, and Little Miami; that GTE, Cincinnati Bell, and Little Miami be granted until June 9, 1997, to file the requested calling data; that the prehearing con- ference scheduled for May 13, 1997, is canceled and shall be rescheduled at a later date. (AE) (3 pgs.)
04/30/1997 Affidavit of Kenton J. Pfister field on behalf of AT&T Com- munications of Ohio by K. Pfister. (12 pgs.)
04/23/1997 Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Sprint Communications Company L.P., by M. Jenkins. (4 pgs.) (FILED 4/22/97)
04/18/1997 Motion of MCI Telecommunications Corporation for extension of time filed by J. Sanders. (4 pgs.)
04/14/1997 Notification by Allnet Communications Services, Inc. dba Frontier Communications Services that on April 9, 1997 Frontier provided calling data (for the month of October 1996) to GTE, Cincinnati Bell and Little Miami as required in this proceeding, filed by M. Nighan. (1 pg.)
04/11/1997 Affidavit of Pam Melton filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by P. Garavito. (2 pgs.)
02/27/1997 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)
02/26/1997 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Communi- cations Corp. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
02/26/1997 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (4 pgs.)
02/19/1997 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keat- ing. (3 pgs.)
02/07/1997 Entry ordering that the respondents shall file their answers or other pleadings with the commission and serve copies upon the spokesperson for the complainants by February 27, 1997, it is further ordered that ALLNET, AT&T, CBLD, LCI,MCI and Sprint shall provide information required by finding (3) to GTE, Cincinnati Bell, and Little Miami and file an affidavit with the commission on or before April 8, 1997, it is further ordered that GTE, Cincinnati Bell, and Little Miami comply with finding (5), it is further ordered that the respondents provide to the Commission and to the spokesperson for the complainants by May 6, 1997, the information required by finding (6), it is further ordered that respondents shall provide to the Commission and to the spokesperson for the complainants by June 3, 1997, the information required by finding (7), it is ordered that the parties comply with finding (8) and that a settlement con- ference be scheduled in accordance with finding (9). (AE) (8 pgs.)
12/23/1996 In the matter of the petition of William D. McKenney and subscribers of the 378 Georgetown exchange for two-way, optional extended area service between Georgetown and the following exchanges: Bethany, Bethel, Cincinnati, Clermont, Hamilton, Little Miami, Newtonsville, and Williamsburg (Cin- cinncati Bell); Decatur and Mowrystown (GTE North); Aberdeen (Ameritech); and Fayetteville (Little Miami Communications). (52 pgs.)