DIS - Case Record for 96-1335-TP-ATA Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1335-TP-ATA

File a Public Comment
Case Title: MINFORD TELEPHONE COMPANY
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ATA-Application for tariff approval
Date Opened: 12/11/1996
Date Closed: 10/15/2010
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/01/1999Memo automatically closing this case of record.1
03/08/1999Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.)64
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Sectio X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845 TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. 12
10/05/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.)5
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns.12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of Intralata Toll Presubscription Charges. Submitted by: J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.12
09/21/1998Final tariff sheets, section 7, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper (2 pgs)2
09/17/1998Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and those of all other companies listed in the caption and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauri- dsen. (9 pgs.)9
08/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.12
08/21/1998Revised tariff sheet; section 7, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
02/05/1998Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
06/26/1997Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 7, original sheets 1, 2, 3; Preface, Table of Contents, 2nd sheet 1; Subject Index, 4th sheet 3, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
06/05/1997Finding & Order that, with the exception of the implementa- tion cost recovery MOU rates, the proposed application is approved; that, after August 8, 1997, the Commission staff will convene a workshop of all interested parties to develop an agreed upon methodology for calculating the applicant's incremental intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rate; that the applicant file their pro- posed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998. (5 pgs.)5
04/30/1997Supplement application filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (14 pgs.)14
01/17/1997Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspend- ed until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/11/1996In the matter of the application of Minford Telephone Company to institute intraLATA dialing parity. (1 pg.)1