| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 03/08/1999 | Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.) | 64 |
| 02/05/1999 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) | 15 |
| 02/05/1999 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) | 15 |
| 12/09/1998 | Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 11/19/1998 | Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing by MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 11/09/1998 | Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.) | 28 |
| 10/26/1998 | Final tariff, PUCO No. 4, Section 8, 1st sheet 3, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied | 23 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. | 12 |
| 10/05/1998 | Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 10/02/1998 | Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.) | 12 |