|
03/08/1999
|
Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.) |
|
02/05/1999
|
Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) |
|
02/05/1999
|
Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) |
|
12/09/1998
|
Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.) |
|
11/19/1998
|
Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.) |
|
11/09/1998
|
Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.) |
|
10/08/1998
|
Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) |
|
10/08/1998
|
Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implemention cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) |
|
10/08/1998
|
Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied |
|
10/05/1998
|
Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) |
|
10/05/1998
|
Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. |
|
10/05/1998
|
Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription charge filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) |
|
10/05/1998
|
Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) |
|
10/02/1998
|
Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.) |
|
10/02/1998
|
Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. |
|
09/24/1998
|
Motion and memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.) |
|
09/24/1998
|
Motion and memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of Intralata Toll Presubscription Charges. Submitted by: J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.) |
|
09/24/1998
|
Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. |
|
09/21/1998
|
Final tariff sheets, section 4, first revised sheet no. 10 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) |
|
09/17/1998
|
Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and those of all other companies listed in the caption and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Telephone Company of Ohio dbs Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauri- dsen. (9 pgs.) |
|
08/21/1998
|
Revised tariff sheet; Section 4, first revised sheet no. 10 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) |
|
06/26/1997
|
Finding & Order that, with the exceptions of the implemen- tation cost recovery MOU rate, the proposed tariffs are approved; that applicant file their proposed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998; that this case be closed of record. (5 pgs.) |
|
04/29/1997
|
Revised tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Hoersten. (16 pgs.) |
|
01/17/1997
|
Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspend- ed until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
12/05/1996
|
In the matter of the application of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company to institute intraLATA dialing parity. (1 pg.) |