DIS - Case Record for 96-1188-TP-AEC Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-1188-TP-AEC
CASE DESCRIPTION: AMERITECH OHIO/URSULINE COLLEGE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 6/17/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
06/18/1998 Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.)
06/11/1998 AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)
06/11/1998 AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)
06/01/1998 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (7 pgs.)
04/30/1998 Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.)
04/09/1998 Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.)
03/26/1998 Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.)
03/16/1998 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (30 pgs.)
02/12/1998 Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal in these cases pur- suant to the directions given in Finding 12; that Ameri- tech's motions seeking to extend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Finding 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings in this entry do not affect the sus- pension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.)
11/08/1996 Unredacted version of contract for Ameritech Centrex Service between Ameritech Ohio and Ursuline College, filed on be- half of applicant by J. Matz. (3 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)
11/08/1996 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)
11/08/1996 Filed under seal. See the Chief of Docketing.
In the matter of the redacted version of a contract for Ameritech Centrex Service between Ameritech Ohio and Ursuline College. (3 pgs.)