DIS - Case Record for 96-1175-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1175-TP-ORD

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AMENDMENT CHAPTER 4901:1-5, OAC
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 11/6/1996
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/29/2002Tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris.8
01/11/2002Tariff final copies of General Exchange tariff P.U.C.O. no. 12, filed by L. Claytor16
01/03/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 21, 1st sheet 7, 2nd sheet 8, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry.3
12/20/2001Finding & Order approving the applications set forth in the Appendix; that the cases in the attached Appendix be closed of record.4
12/20/2001Service notice19
12/20/2001Service notice18
11/15/2001Entry ordering that case No. 96-1175-TP-ORD is closed of record.1
12/05/2000Entry ordering that all of the tariff revisions submitted in the context of the tariff amendment application identified in the Appendix to this entry are hereby suspended for an indefinite period of time, pending the issuance of an entry setting forth specific language which the Commission will recommend should be uniformly adopted by telecommunications service providers to bring their tariffs into complete compliance with the new toll blocking policy and amended rules. (AE)5
11/06/2000Ohio Relay Service traffic and monthly reports for the month of October 2000, filed by K. Shipley. (11 pgs.)11
10/25/2000Updated information filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
10/24/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, 1st page 21, 1st page 23, filed on behalf of Broadwing Communications, Inc. by T. McCloud. (3 pgs.)3
10/23/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, 1st page 34, 1st page 41, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance by T. McCloud. (3 pgs.)3
10/23/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 2, 3rd page 32; PUCO No. 2, Section 13, 1st page 20.5, filed on behalf of Cin- cinnati Bell by T. McCloud. (3 pgs.)3
09/21/2000Entry ordering that all LECs and IXCs whose existing tariffs do not presently comport with the new foll blocking policy and/or the adopted rule amendments must file, by October 23, 2000, applications to amend their tariffs, for the purpose of bringing them into compliance; that, unless the Commis- sion specifically orders otherwise, the new toll blocking policy and corresponding rule amendments, which were adopted by the Commission of April 6, 2000 and became effective on September 18, 2000, shall remain in effect and shall super- sede any conflicting or inconsistent provisions in any com- pany's tariffs. (2 pgs.)2
09/15/2000Application for temporary waiver filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by J. Kelly. (8 pgs.)8
09/14/2000Correspondence filed. (1 pg)1
08/10/2000Entry granting request to waive Rule 4901:1-5-6(C)(6)(d), O.A.C pursuant to Finding (4) (2 pgs)2
08/03/2000Additional information filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue.3
07/28/2000Ohio Relay Service Reports for the month of June 2000, filed by S. Behringer. (10 pgs.)10
07/21/2000Revised Exhibit A to be used in conjunction with the waiver request, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (4 pgs.)4
07/06/2000Application for waiver filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart.5
07/06/2000Application for waiver filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
06/22/2000Entry ordering that the April 6, 2000 entry is clarified in accordance with the findings of this entry; that OCC/Edgemont's application for rehearing is denied.20
06/21/2000Ohio relay service reports filed on behalf of Sprint by K. Shipley.10
06/02/2000Service Notice13
06/02/2000Service Notice13
06/01/2000Entry ordering that OCC/Edgemont's May 5, 2000 application for rehearing be granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing. (2 pgs.)2
06/01/2000Entry granting OCC/Edgemont's application for rehearing.2
05/15/2000Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing of The Ohio Consumers Counsel and the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge.7
05/15/2000Memorandum contra application for rehearing of OCC and the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition filed on behalf of AT&T, by D. Chorzempa.5
05/15/2000Memorandum contra application for rehearing of OCC and The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
05/05/2000Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; and Edgemont Neighborhood coalition by E. Jacobs.27
04/19/2000Entry ordering that, in accordance with these findings, the deadline for filing applications to amend tariffs in a manner that would bring them into accordance with the new toll blocking policy and rule amendments adopted in this matter is hereby postponed, on an indefinite basis, until a new deadline for such filings is established by a future entry to be issued in this docket. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
04/19/2000Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, the deadline for filing applications to amend tariffs is hereby postponed, on an indefinite basis, until a new deadline for such filings is established by a future entry to be issued in this docket (DF)15
04/19/2000Entry ordering that the deadline for filing applications to amend tariffs in a manner that would bring them into accordance with the new toll blocking policy and rule amendments adopted in this matter is hereby postponed, on an indefinite basis, until a new deadline for such filings is established by a future entry to be issued in this docket.2
04/06/2000Entry ordering that the Commission hereby revised its exist- ing toll blocking policy so as to incorporate within it the Selective Access Policy set forth in Appendix 1 to this entry; that the amendments to Rules 4901:1-5-14 and 4901:1- 5-19, O.A.C. attached to this entry are adopted. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig A. Glazer. (38 pgs.)38
04/06/2000Entry ordering that the amendments to Rules 4901:1-5-14 and 4901:1-5-19, O.A.C. are hereby adopted. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig A. Glazer.38
02/03/2000Entry ording that Ameritech's application (97-1729-TP-ATA) be approved. (4 pgs.)4
12/02/1999Entry to Address Filed Comments and Entry on Rehearing ordering that Ameritech's application for rehearing regarding its third, fourth, sixth, and seventh assign- ments of error is denied; that Ameritech's application for rehearing regarding its first, second and fifth assign- ments of error are granted; that AT&T/MCI's application for rehearing regarding its third assignment of error is denied; that AT&T/MCI's application for rehearing regarding its first and second assignments of error is granted; that Ameritech file amendments to the proposed recourse tariff in accordance with the findings herein to Section 1.2 pursuant to Finding 22, Sections 1.6 and Subsection 7.1.3 (the re- course claim form) pursuant to Finding 30, Section 2.7 pur- suant to Finding 38, Section 3.2 pursuant to Finding 44, Section 4.4 pursuant to Finding 59, and Section 8.1 pursuant to Finding 69; Ameritech shall file these referenced amend- ments with the Commission's docketing division and serve a copy upon all interested persons no later than December 10, 1999. (34 pgs.)34
11/17/1999October Ohio Relay Service Monthly Reports filed by K. Shipley. (13 pgs.)13
11/16/1999Reply Comments of Sprint Communications Company L.P. and United Telephone Co. of Ohio d/b/a Sprint Concerning the Staff's Proposal. Filed by J. Stewart (filed on 11/15/99) (5 pgs)5
11/15/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (20 pgs.)20
11/15/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (10 pgs.)12
11/15/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. (8 pgs.)10
11/15/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom Communica- tions, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (6 pgs.)6
11/15/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
11/10/1999Letter informing the Commission that AT&T Communications of Ohio intends to file its reply on November 18, 1999, filed by D. Chorzempa. (1 pg.)1
11/04/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech's August 17, 1999 application for temporary waiver is granted, subject to the additional conditions set forth in this entry; that Ameritech shall place all involuntary universally toll blocked customers into a dePICed status as soon as possible, and in any event, by April 1, 2000; that Ameritech shall provide a customer notice by December 1, 1999; that Ameritech shall work with the Commission's staff, and obtain its prior approval, in coming up with the language which shall be included in the required customer notice. (9 pgs.)9
11/02/1999Entry granting the rehearing for the limited purpose of affording the Commission a short extension of time to more thoroughly consider and address the arguments raised in Ameritech's and AT&T/MCI's respective applications for re- hearing. (2 pgs.)2
10/21/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (10 pgs.)10
10/21/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (9 pgs.)9
10/21/1999Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; and Edge- mont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (8 pgs.)8
10/21/1999Comments filed on behalf of MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (5 pgs.)5
10/21/1999Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)7
10/14/1999Memorandum contra Ameritech's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa; and MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders. (16 pgs.)16
10/14/1999Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (15 pgs.)15
10/04/1999Joint application for rehearing of AT&T Communications, TCG Ohio and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc., filed by B. Kahn. (11 pgs)11
10/04/1999Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (19 pgs)19
09/30/1999Entry ordering that all interested stake holders are invited to file initial and/or reply comments to the staff's pro- posal which is attached as Appendix A to this entry by October 21, 1999 and November 15, 1999, respectively. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (22 pgs.)22
09/21/1999Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (22 pgs.)22
09/17/1999Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by J. Bentine. (6 pgs.)6
09/17/1999Additional comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (6 pgs.)6
09/17/1999Joint comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; MCImetro Access Transmission Ser- vices by J. Sanders; and CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (15 pgs.)15
09/14/1999Memorandum in response to application for waiver; request for conditions if waiver is granted, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (10 pgs.)10
09/10/1999Entry ordering that all interested persons file comments regarding Ameritech's amendments (filed Sept.9, 1999) no later than Sept 17, 1999. by G. See (2pgs)2
09/09/1999Entry ordering that an expedited ruling is warranted in accordance with Finding 4; that a one-week extension of time be granted in accordance with Finding 5; that persons interested in responding to Ameritech's August 17, 1999 application must file their responsive pleadings by Sep- tember 14, 1999. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
09/07/1999Motion for extension of time, request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (6 pgs.)6
09/02/1999Finding & Order that Ameritech file amendments to the pro- posed recourse tariff by September 9, 1999; that the effec- tive date of the recourse tariff as revised herein will be upon the Commission's issuance of an entry approving the tariff amendments specified in this order. (30 pgs.)30
08/31/1999Sprint's notice of substitution of counsel, filed by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
08/17/1999Application for temporary waiver filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by J. Kelly. (21 pgs.)21
07/15/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech comply with the toll dis- connect requirements set forth in Finding 2. (2 pgs.)2
06/08/1999Transcript for Toll Credit Risk Management Workshop held on 5/25/99, 80 pgs., sub.80
05/28/1999Reply Comments of Telecommunications Resellers Assoc. Submitted by: S. Bloomfield. (4 pgs.)4
05/28/1999Ameritech Ohio's Reply Comments. Submitted by: J. Kelly. (32 pgs.)32
05/26/1999Entry denying Ameritech's April 28, 1999 application for rehearing in its entirety. (2 pgs.)2
05/19/1999Joint comments to Ameritech's MTSS recourse tariff, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn; and MCImetro Access Transmission by J. Sanders. (18 pgs.)18
05/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (12 pgs.)12
05/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (7 pgs.)7
05/17/1999Memorandum in response filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.)9
05/17/1999Entry ordering that all of the listed workshop issues pro- posed by Ameritech Ohio, Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn., and OCC are in keeping with the terms of the Commis- sion's April 8, 1999 finding & Order; consequently, each of those issues has been added to the master list of workshop issues prepared by the PUCO staff, which is set forth in the appendix to this entry. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
05/10/1999The consumer Coalition's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; the City of Toledo by K. Bruce; the Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Empowerment Center of Greater Cleve- land by J. Meissner. (14 pgs.)14
04/29/1999Entry ordering that, in accordance with Finding 7, inter- ested stakeholders are invited to comment on Ameritech's revised tariff proposal docketed on April 5, 1999, in 97- 1729; that affected interconnection agreements be modified in accordance with Finding 8. (4 pgs.)4
04/28/1999Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (22 pgs.)22
04/27/1999Joint motion for procedural schedule and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn; and MCImetro Access Transmission by J. Sanders. (7 pgs.)7
04/08/1999Finding & Order that the motions for protective order filed by Ameritech, Nextlink, and Sprint are granted; that no need has been shown for formally reexamining the Commission's existing policy on toll blocking and that policy shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect; that the interim relief granted to Ameritech under the February 4, 1999 entry shall terminate on May 23, 2991, and Ameritech must fully comply with the Commission's selective toll blocking by that same date; that Ameritech shall submit to the Commission's staff by April 29, 1999, a compliance plan describing in detail how it will bring itself into full compliance with the selective toll blocking policy by May 23, 1999; that a workshop shall be held on May 25, 1999 and all potential participants should, at least 15 days prior to the workshop, present to the Commission's staff (c/o Attorney Examiner Fullin), a list of issues which the participant proposes should be addressed through the workshop the staff will review these submissions, and prepare a master list of those issues that are in keeping with the terms of this entry. Separate Concurring Opinion of Ronda Hartman Fergus and Jolynn Barry Butler.16
03/19/1999Revised tariff; the purpose of this filing is to revise the Minimum Telephone Service Standards using the accepted proposed language, filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Revised tariff; the purpose of this filing is to revise the Minimum Telephone Service Standards using the accepted proposed language, filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Revised tariff; the purpose of this filing is to revise the Minimum Telephone Service Standards using the accepted proposed langauge, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Tariff; the purpose of this filing is to revise the Minimum Telephone Service Standards using the accepted proposed tariff language, filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Revised tariff; the purpose of this filing is to revise the Minimum Telephone Standards using the accepted proposed language, filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Revised minimum telephone service standards using the accepted proposed language, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp.-Fayetteville Exchange by N. Lawton.2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 2, 4th sheet 7, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. - Fayette- ville exchange, by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 3, 4th sheet 3, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. - Butler- ville exchange, by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 2, 3rd sheet 6, filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 2, 3rd sheet 6, filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 3, 1st sheet 3, filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section III, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by N. Lawton. (2 pgs.)2
03/04/1999Unprotected reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by B. Cohen.23
03/03/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge.10
03/03/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.9
03/03/1999Confidential reply comments filed on behalf of The Consumer Coalition; OCC by B. Cohen; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Edge- mont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. (22 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)22
03/03/1999Reply comments of the Ashtabula County Telephone Cone Coalition filed by E. Schaeffer.10
03/01/1999Data response filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Maguire.3
03/01/1999Certificate of service, filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Company by L. Claytor.4
03/01/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. by L. Claytor. (4 pgs.)4
03/01/1999Data and response filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Maguire. (3 pgs.)3
02/24/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co., L.P. by B. Donahue.3
02/24/1999Supplemental information response of Oakwood Telephone Company in response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper.8
02/24/1999Supplemental information response of the Vanlue Telephone Company in response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper.8
02/24/1999Supplemental information response of Continental Telephone Company in response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper.8
02/24/1999Letter stating that United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. have provided copies of their redacted data responses and the motion for protective order to the attached supplemental service list, filed by B. Donahue. (3 pgs.)3
02/23/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper.8
02/23/1999Information response filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by G. Cooper.7
02/23/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
02/23/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
02/23/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Contin- ental Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
02/23/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
02/23/1999Information response filed on behalf of Germantown Indepen- dent Telephone by G. Cooper. (7 pgs.)7
02/19/1999Information response of the Ayersville Telephone Company in response to entries of February 4, 1999 filed by T. Lodge.5
02/19/1999Comments of the consumer coalition filed by D. Bergmann.10
02/19/1999Information response of the Vanlue Telephone Company In response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper6
02/19/1999Informational response filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc. by R. Williams.2
02/19/1999Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, the informational responses and/or initial comments of The Arthur Mutual Telephone Co., the Bascom Mutual Telephone Co, The Conneaut Tele. Co., The Doylestown Tele. Co, The Farmers Mutual Tele. Co., Fort. Jennings Tel. Co, Minford Tele. Co., New Knoxville Tele. Co., Nova Tele. Co., Ottoville Mutual Tel. Co, Telephone Service Co., Wabash Mutual Tel. Co, Telecommunications Resellers Assoc., Nextlink Ohio, Inc, and MCI/Worldcom shall be considered as if they had been timely filed, that the directives set forth in Finding (6) be observed.10
02/19/1999Informational response filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc. by R. Williams.2
02/19/1999Entry ordering the acceptance of the listed companies info- rmational responses and/or initial comments as timely filed; reply comments must be filed by 3/3/99. (DF) (10 pgs)10
02/18/1999Information response filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Depinet.3
02/18/1999Information response filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Co. by R. Ringler.3
02/18/1999Information request of selective blocking and uncollectible, filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone by D. Stechler.3
02/18/1999Information response of the Ayersville Telephone Company in response to February 4, 1999 entry filed by T. Lodge.5
02/18/1999Information request on Selective Blocking and Uncollectible, filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Stachler.3
02/18/1999Information response of R. Ringler on behalf of Nova Tele- phone Company. (3 pgs)3
02/18/1999Information response of D. Depinet on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Company. (3 pgs)3
02/18/1999Unredacted version of response to data request filed by D. D. Kinkoph on behalf of Nextlink Ohio Inc. (12 pgs) (FILED UNDER SEAL)4
02/18/1999Information response filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Depinet.5
02/17/1999Motion for protection and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio, by J. Small.7
02/17/1999Request that the information response be accepted as timely filed, submitted on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders.1
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by J. Sholls. (Fax)2
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by S. Berelsman.1
02/17/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kinkoph.4
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by S. Quellhorst.1
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by T. Brockman.3
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by P. McGraw.1
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by K. Kling.er.3
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by K. Ebersole. (Fax)7
02/17/1999Information response to appendix A, regarding toll blocking and uncollectibles, filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Company by E. Damman.3
02/17/1999Informational response, filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company. 3
02/17/1999Information response of Oakwood Telephone in response to entries of 2/4/1999 by G. Cooper.15
02/17/1999Response filed by C. Conover on behalf of Telephone Service Company (3 pgs)3
02/17/1999Response filed by D. Hoersten on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company (3 pgs)3
02/17/1999Response filed by P. McGraw on behalf of Minford Telephone Company. (1 pg)1
02/17/1999Response filed by S. Berelsman on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. (1 pg)1
02/17/1999Response filed by E. Damman on behalf of Farmers Mutual Tel- ephone Company. (3 pgs)3
02/17/1999Response filed by S. Quellhorst on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Company. (1 pg)1
02/17/1999Response filed by T. Brockman on behalf of Doylestown Tele- phone Company. (3 pgs)3
02/17/1999Response filed by K. Ebersole on behalf of Conneaut Tele- phone Company. (7 pgs)7
02/17/1999Response filed by J. Sholl on behalf of Arthur Mutual Tele- phone Company. (2 pgs)2
02/17/1999Memorandum in support of the re-examination of universal toll blocking policy filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association. (5 pgs)5
02/17/1999Motion for protection and memorandum in support filed by J. Small on behalf of Nextlink Ohio, Inc. (7 pgs)7
02/17/1999Memorandum in support of the Commission's re-examination of Universal Toll Blocking Policy, filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by S. Bloomfield.5
02/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Company by K. Ebersole (fax)7
02/17/1999Letter regarding selective blocking and uncollectible for LEC's and IXC's filed by C. Conover. 3
02/17/1999Telecommunications Resellers Association's memorandum in support of the Commission's Re-Examination of Universal toll blocking policy, filed by S. Bloomfield. 5
02/16/1999Motion for a protective order filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart.2
02/16/1999Ameritech Ohio's responses filed by J. Kelly.17
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by B. Donahue.16
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.1
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by E. Baldrate.5
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. by L. Claytor.21
02/16/1999Redacted version of information response filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kinkoph.4
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of GTE North by T. Colquitt.11
02/16/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.9
02/16/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by G. Cooper.16
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by G. Cooper.8
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by G. Cooper.8
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Maguire.2
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio by D. Conway.10
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Alltel Companies (Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve) by T. Lodge.8
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper.6
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by M. Ellerbrock.5
02/16/1999Response Of The ALLTEL Companies to Entries of February 4,1999, filed by T. Lodge.9
02/16/1999Information response of Continental Telephone Company filed by G. Cooper. (6 pgs)6
02/16/1999Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Consumers' Coalition by B. Cohen.10
02/16/1999Information response filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by G. Cooper.6
02/16/1999Motion and memorandum in support for protective order filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.9
02/16/1999Response of Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc. as required by Commission's February 4, 1999 entry filed by R. Williams.2
02/16/1999Information response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Company by G. Cooper.6
02/16/1999Information response of Arcadia Telephone Company filed by G. Cooper. (8 pgs)8
02/16/1999Information response of Little Miami Communications Corpor- ation filed by G. Cooper. (6 pgs)6
02/16/1999Information response of Vanlue Telephone Company filed by G. Cooper. (6 pgs)6
02/16/1999Response of Oakwood Telephone Company filed by G. Cooper. (6 pgs)6
02/16/1999Initial Comments of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association filed by G. Cooper. (11 pgs)16
02/16/1999Response to Appendix A filed by T. Colquitt on behalf of GTE North Incorporated. (11 pgs)11
02/16/1999Response filed by D. Conaway on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio Inc. (10 pgs)10
02/16/1999Responses and policies filed by E. Baldrate on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. (5 pgs)5
02/16/1999Response to Appendix A filed by L. Claytor on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. (21 pgs)21
02/16/1999Motion for a protective order filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart.9
02/16/1999Information response of Continental Telephone Company in response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper.6
02/16/1999Information response of Oakwood Telephone Company in response to entry of February 4, 1999, filed by G. Cooper.6
02/16/1999Information response of the Columbus Grove Telephone Company in response to entries of February 2, 1999, filed T. Lodge.8
02/16/1999Motion for a protective order filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart.2
02/04/1999Entry ordering that in accordance with Finding 8, the appli- cation for waiver filed by the joint applicants on January 20, 1999 is denied and dismissed on procedural grounds; that the joint applicants (i.e., each individual LEC and IXC who has sought the waiver under consideration) must respond to each of the items set forth in Appendix A to this entry, by no later than February 16, 1999; that Ameritech Ohio must respond both to the items set forth in Appendix A to this entry and also to the additional item set forth in Appendix B to this entry; that the joint applicants must fully assist the Commission's staff in compiling any additional data or information which may prove necessary for the Commission to consider in arriving at an informed decision on whether to formally re-evaluate their current universal toll blocking policy; that any person or entity who wishes to be heard on the issue of why the Commission's existing universal toll blocking should (or should not) now be re-examined must do so by filing initial comments to that effect by February 16, 1999; reply comments in response to any time-filed initial comments, will also be considered by the Commission, so long as they are filed by March 2, 1999; that interim relief for Ameritech is granted in accordance with Finding 13; the Com- mission specifically clarifies however, that under the in- terim relief being granted, Ameritech shall not be author- ized to block toll access to toll carriers other than those from whom Ameritech has purchased the accounts receivable, and for whom Ameritech is a contractually authorized billing agent. (12 pgs.)12
02/04/1999Entry denying the application for waiver filed by the joint applicants and is deemed dismissed on procedural grounds.12
02/04/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech must file in this docket, no later than February 16, 1999, a pleading pertaining to its interim relief which sets forth all such facts and arguments as Ameritech wishes to have the Commission to formally re- examine the existing toll blocking policy, the further dec- ision must also be made to either terminate or extend the interim relief now granted to Ameritech; that any person or entity who wishes to respond to Ameritech's February 16, 1999 pleading shall do so in comments which must be filed by March 2, 1999; that when Ameritech responds to the items set forth in Appendices A and B to the Commission's February 4, 1999 entry, Ameritech should do wo within a document filed by February 16, 1999; that anyperson or entity who wishes to respond to Ameritech's February 16, 1999 informational response shall do so in comments which must be filed by March 2, 1999; that when the joint applicants respond to the items set forth in Appendix A to the Commission's February 4, 1999 entry they must do so within a document filed by February 16, 1999; that any person or entity who wishes to respond to the joint applicants' February 16, 1999 infor- mational responses shall do so in comments which must be filed by March 2, 1999. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
01/31/1999Opposition of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition to the application for waiver by Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by E Schaeffer.6
01/31/1999Objections filed on behalf of The Consumer Coalition: OCC by D. Bergmann; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; Appalachian Peoples' Choice Coalition by M. Smalz; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; and Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner.14
01/29/1999Objections filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer.6
01/29/1999Objections filed on behalf of The Consumer Coalition: OCC by D. Bergmann; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; and Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner.14
01/25/1999Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, any comments to be submitted in response to the January 20, 1999, application for waiver in this case must, in order to be considered as timely, be filed or before January 29, 1999.(DF)2
01/25/1999Entry ordering comments in response to the 1/20/99 applica- tion for waiver must be filed on or before 1/29/99. (DF) (2 pgs)2
01/20/1999Application for waiver filed on behalf of Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge; AT&T Communications by D. Chorzempa; MCI/Worldcom by J. Sanders; Nextlink by D. Kinkoph; and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. Lauridsen.12
12/04/1998Resolution No. 308-98 filed by M. Hughes on behalf of the City of Parma. (3 pgs)3
11/10/1998Withdrawal of application for waiver filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)3
11/04/1998Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's application for waiver amendment of Chapt. 4901:1-5 of Ohio Administrative Code, filed by J. Westbrook, Cleveland City Council. (4 pgs.)4
10/26/1998Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (11 pgs.)11
10/22/1998Joint surreply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (23 pgs.)23
10/22/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kin- koph. (4 pgs.)4
10/22/1998Substitution of counsel and notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (7 pgs.)7
10/22/1998Joiint surreply comments of AT&T and TCG filed by D, Chorzempa.23
10/15/1998Entry ordering that GTE's and Sprint's request to waive Rule 4901:1-5-6(C)(5), O.A.C. in regards to listing the names of all LECs served by the directory, is granted pursuant to Finding 4. (2 pgs.)2
10/14/1998Memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for waiver, filed by G. Minnick. (3 pgs.)3
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
09/25/1998Application for waiver filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.22
09/23/1998Application for waiver, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.7
09/23/1998Application for waiver, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.6
09/17/1998Supreme Court Case # 97-2333 returned. (3 Vols.) Destroyed.0
09/10/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (73 pgs.)73
09/10/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (73 pgs.)73
08/26/1998Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (15 pgs.)15
08/26/1998Comments of Nextlink Ohio, Inc. filed by D. Clayton and D. Kinkoph. (10 pgs)10
08/20/1998Entry ordering that CBT's request to waive Rule 4901:1-5-6 (C)(5), O.A.C. in regards to listing the names of all LECs served by the directory, is granted pursuant to Finding 4. (2 pgs.)2
08/18/1998Additional information filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by B. Wentz. (1 pg.)1
07/28/1998Application for waiver filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by N. Rue. (2 pgs.)2
05/28/1998Response to correspondence filed by staff. (3 pgs.)3
05/13/1998Entry ordering that all MTSS adopted on June 26, 1997 are currently effective, including Rule 4901:1-5-01(G), O.A.C., the carrier-to-carrier indemnification provision, absent a Commission approved waiver; that specifically Rule 4901:1-5- 01(G), O.A.C. was effective as of January 1, 1998, and is currently effective for all LECs and NECs; that Ameritech's application for rehearing is denied; that Ameritech begin to process indemnification claims submitted by the NECs immediately and to work with the NECs to amend its inter- connection agreements as necessary while continuing to work with Staff to develop an acceptable tariff in 97-1729. (7 pgs.)7
04/30/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns; Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton; and Time Warner Communications of Ohio by M. Schermer. (9 pgs.)9
04/30/1998Memorandum contra Ameritech's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
04/30/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's request to waive Rule 4901:1-5-6(C)(5), O.A.C. is granted pursuant to Finding 5. (4 pgs.)4
04/28/1998Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (15 pgs.)15
04/24/1998TCG Ohio's memorandum contra Ameritech's Application for Waiver. Filed by: B. Weston. (7 pgs.)7
04/23/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for waiver, filed on behalf of WorldCom Technologies and ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)4
04/22/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for waiver, filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton; and Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer. (5 pgs.)5
04/20/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (11 pgs.)11
04/09/1998Application for waiver filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
03/19/1998Entry ordering that the indemnification provisions of Rule 4901:1-5-01(G), O.A.C., which was effective as of January 1, 1998 for NECs, will not be delayed for the lack of an effective interconnection agreement or tariff provision detailing the procedure for indemnification. (4 pgs.)4
03/02/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (4 pgs.)4
02/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (82 pgs.)82
02/11/1998Cellular One's support for joint recommendation filed by W. Adams. (4 pgs.)4
02/11/1998Letter stating that comments have been served on the persons listed on attachment A of the entry, filed on behalf of Frontier Telemanagement, Inc., Frontier Local Services, Inc. Telecommunications Resellers Association and Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio filed by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
02/10/1998Certificate of service filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (2 pgs.)2
02/03/1998Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup. (2 pgs.)2
02/02/1998Finding & Order approving the application.34
02/02/1998Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in 97-1729,shall serve a copy of those comments on the persons listed in the attached appendix; that Ameritech file any reply comments by February 20, 1998 and serve a copy of any reply comments filed in 97-1729 on the persons listed in the attached appendix. (GS)8
01/30/1998Comments of Telecommunications Resellers Association filed by S. Bloomfield. 6
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (15 pgs.)15
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by M. Hazzard. (5 pgs.)5
01/30/1998Comments of Telecommunications Resellers association filed by S. Bloomfield.6
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by R. Lambert.46
01/30/1998Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by M. Schermer and T. Davis.6
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (19 pgs.)19
01/30/1998Joint recommendation filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn; Brooks Fiber Communi- cations of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; LCI International by J. Nichols; MCImetro Access Transmission Services by M. Berns and B. Royer; Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton; TCG Ohio by D. Trabarids and B. Weston; and Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer. (13 pgs.)13
01/30/1998Motion to intervene and comments and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (12 pgs.)12
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (11 pgs.)11
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.)7
01/30/1998Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communica- tions of Ohio by M. Schermer and T. Davis. (6 pgs.)6
01/30/1998Comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)6
01/23/1998Comments filed on behalf of Frontier Telemanagement Inc. and Frontier Local Services Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)6
01/23/1998Entry ordering that TCG's motion for an extension to file comments in 97-1729 until January 30, 1998, is granted and all interested persons who wish to file comments should do so by January 30, 1998. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
01/20/1998Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.)9
01/13/1998Memorandum contra Ameritech's motion for extension and clarification filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (6 pgs.)6
01/12/1998Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.)6
01/12/1998Entry ordering that Time Warner and CBT shall have until January 15, 1998, to amend their interconnection agreement to implement the minimum telephone service standards issued June 26, 1997 on the relevant aspects of the carrier-to- carrier relationship. (AE) (1 pg.)1
01/09/1998Entry ordering that approval of Ameritech's application to amend its tariff in 97-1729 is suspended until the Commission specifically orders otherwise; that any interested person or entity wishing to file comments regarding Ameritech proposed tariff amendment do so by the close of business on January 23, 1998. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
01/07/1998Request for extension of time to resolve the MTSS issues in the interconnection agreement between Cincinnati Bell Telephone and Time Warner Communications filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by S. Kritzer. (2 pgs.)2
12/31/1997MCImetro Access Transmission Services's comments and memor- andum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for extension of time and clarification, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (5 pgs.)5
12/30/1997Motion for an extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (6 pgs.)6
12/29/1997Motion for additional extension of time and clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.)6
12/15/1997Entry ordering that Ameritech, Time Warner and ICG each shall have until December 31, 1997 to amend their respec- tive interconnection agreements to incorporate the effects of the minimum telephone service standards issued June 26, 1997 on the relevant aspects of the carrier-to-carrier relationship. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/10/1997Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (9 pgs.)9
11/10/1997Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (440 pgs.) (S.C. #97-2333)440
10/30/1997Update to service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (1 pg.)1
10/09/1997Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.)3
10/09/1997Motion for an extension of time filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (3 pgs.)3
10/08/1997Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.)6
09/11/1997Entry ordering that LECs shall submit, for Commission approval, joint applications to amend their interconnection agreements, in accordance with Finding 20, by October 9, 1997; that all applications for rehearing are denied and the Finding and Order is clarified as set forth in this entry; that the waiver granted as to the timing issues rules expire in accordance with Findings 8, 9, 10, and 11; that Rule 4901:1-5-07(D), O.A.C. is waived for one year from the date of this entry, and Rule 4901:1-5-08(A), O.A.C. is suspended in accordance with Finding 60. (59 pgs.)59
08/20/1997Entry granting the rehearing for the purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues on which rehearing and clarification have been requested pur- suant to Finding 8; that the effective date of the timing issue rules is temporarily waived until the Commission specifically orders otherwise pursuant to Finding 8. (3 pgs.)3
08/07/1997Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (26 pgs.)26
08/07/1997Entry ordering that Ashtabula's, Minnick's and Sprint's applications for rehearing are granted solely to afford the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised in the application. (4 pgs.)4
08/07/1997Memorandum in response to applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (13 pgs.)13
08/07/1997Memorandum contra Ameritech's and OTIA's applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (12 pgs.)12
08/07/1997Memorandum contra of AT&T Communications of Ohio to applications for rehearing on MTTS filed by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.)10
08/07/1997Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
08/06/1997Memorandum of MCI Telecommunications Corp. contra appli- cation for rehearing, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (13 pgs.)13
07/29/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (36 pgs.) (FILED 7/28/97)36
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Associa- tion by T. Lodge. (37 pgs.)37
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (19 pgs.)19
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (16 pgs.)16
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.)15
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neigh- borhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (11 pgs.)11
07/28/1997Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (7 pgs.)7
07/25/1997Comments filed on behalf of Mahoning/Trumbull Counties by T. Vuletich and G. Minnick. (10 pgs.)10
07/23/1997Application for rehearing and/or clarification filed on behalf of Sprint by T. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)2
07/23/1997Request for Reconsideration filed by G. Minnick's. (2 pgs.)1
07/23/1997Correspondence letter filed on behalf of Summit County Council by K. Zurz. (1 pg.)1
07/17/1997Application for rehearing of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition filed by E. Schaeffer. (15 pgs.)15
07/02/1997Entry ordering that, pursuant to Rule 4901:1-5-01(B), O.A. C., the request for waiver filed by OTIA is granted until August 21, 1997; that the current practices of the indivi- dual telephone companies which relate to the subject matter of teh rules which are specified in the request shall remain appliable until August 21, 1997. (3 pgs.)3
07/01/1997Motion for temporary waiver of effective date for specified rules and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.)10
06/26/1997Finding & Order that the current Rules 4901:1-5-01 through 4901:0-5-36, O.A.C. shall be rescinded effective July 7, 1997; that the MTSS as discussed herein and attached to this Finding & Order are hereby adopted in final form as of the date of this Finding & Order; that the adopted rules be effective July 7, 1997. (175 pgs.)175
06/09/1997Response letter to The Honorable Rhine L. McLin filed by the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
05/01/1997Comments concerning the application, filed by R. Bartels. (1 pg.)1
03/26/1997Withdrawal of trial attorney and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
03/21/1997Comments filed on behalf of VoiceLog LLC by J. Veilleux. (18 pgs.)18
03/21/1997Correspondence letters filed by various consumers. (3 pgs.)3
03/11/1997Surreply of the Telecommunications Resellers Association filed by A. Isar. (8 pgs.)8
03/10/1997Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Sleeper, Highlights for Children. (1 pg.)1
02/28/1997Applicaiton for waiver filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating.6
02/28/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.4
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.14
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated by J. Stewart.12
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and the Appalachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs.14
02/28/1997Certificate of Service, filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and The Appalachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs.4
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by K. Hardie. (36 pgs.)36
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (20 pgs.)20
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by W. Price II. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Communications Buying Group, Inc. by N. Hawthorne. (13 pgs.)13
02/28/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and The Appalachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs. (3 pgs.)3
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and the Appalachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (12 pgs.)12
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley. (12 pgs.)12
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint United Telephone Company of Ohio and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by S. Williams. (11 pgs.)11
02/28/1997Notice of filing, and reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Payphone Assn. by H. Kelly. (10 pgs.)10
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by J. Harrison. (9 pgs.)9
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (8 pgs.)8
02/28/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio, L.L.C. by D. Clayton. (6 pgs.)6
02/27/1997Reply commentary filed on behalf of J. Drew Mc Farland by J. Mc Farland. (4 pgs.)4
02/26/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
02/24/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (2 pgs.)2
02/21/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (3 pgs.)3
02/20/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecom- munications Indistry Association by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)3
02/19/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Berg- mann. (5 pgs.)5
02/19/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)3
02/19/1997Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in response to the entry issued December 31, 1996 in this docket, shall serve a copy of those comments, as well as any reply comments, on the persons listed in the attached amended appendix. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
02/14/1997Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in re- sponse to the entry issued December 31, 1996 in this docket, shall serve a copy of those comments, as well as any reply comments, on the persons listed in the attached appendix. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
02/13/1997Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Payphone Association by M. Ward. (16 pgs.)16
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation by J. Sanders.15
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders.15
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommuni- cations Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (87 pgs.)87
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of OCC by K. Hardie. (58 pgs.)58
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (43 pgs.)43
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of Sprint (United Telephone) by S. Williams; and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins. (32 pgs.)32
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (23 pgs.)23
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley. (15 pgs.)15
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.)15
02/12/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)9
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of Working Assets Funding Service by W. McGee. (6 pgs.)6
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of J. Drew Mc Farland. (5 pgs.)5
02/12/1997Comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
02/11/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (22 pgs.)22
02/11/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighbor- hood Coalition and The Appalachian People's Action Coali- tion by E. Jacobs. (11 pgs.)11
02/04/1997Reply comments filed by G. Minnick. (2 pgs.)2
01/21/1997Comments filed on behalf of the Telecommunications Resel- lers Assn. by A. Isar. (9 pgs.)9
12/31/1996Service Notice0
12/31/1996Entry ordering that all parties wishing to file comments shall now have until February 12, 1997 to do so; reply comments should be filed by February 28, 1997. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/27/1996Motion for extionsion of commment period for December 5, 1996 proposed MTSS rules and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by E. Campbell; Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry; Ohio Cable Telecommunications by D. Clayton; MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley. (8 pgs.)8
12/18/1996Motion of The Ohio Telephone Association for extension of time to file comments and reply comments filed by T. Lodge, R. Prohaska. (6 pgs.)6
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part III0
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part II0
12/05/1996Entry ordering that any person wishing to file comments relating to the proposed amendment of Chapter 4905:1-5, O.A.C. should de so by January 20, 1997; reply comments should be filed by February 10, 1997; that a workshop be held on January 6, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (60 pgs.)60
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part VII 0
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part VI0
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part V0
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part IV )0
12/05/1996Survey and Analysis of The Telecommunications Quality-of- Service Preferences and Experiences of the Customers of Ohio Local Telephone Companies filed by The National Regulatory Research Institute. Part I (1-100 of 693 pgs.)0
11/06/1996In the matter of the Amendment of Chapter 4901:1-5 of the Ohio Administrative Code. (1 pg.)1