DIS - Case Record for 96-0349-TP-ACE Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0349-TP-ACE

Case Title: BROOKS FIBER COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ACE-Application for a certificate
Date Opened: 4/5/1996
Date Closed: 3/3/1997
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/17/1997Memorandum of AT&T Communications of Ohio, INc. regarding Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio, Inc.'s motion for clarification filed by B. Kahn. (8 pgs.)8
07/25/1997Revised Fresh Look Notice filed on behalf of applicant by P. Venema. (2 pgs.)2
07/22/1997Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (6 pgs.)6
07/17/1997Finding & Order that the comments set forth in Finding 4 are accepted as timely filed; that the Commission's fresh look policies are further clarified in accordance with Finding 6; that Nextlink, ICG, Time Warner, Brooks Fiber, and any other operational new entrant providers as defined herein, file notice within five calendar days as set forth in Finding 6. (30 pgs.)30
07/16/1997Change of address filed by M. Schermer. (1 pg.)1
07/14/1997Comments filed on behalf of Voice-Tel by S. Dowd. (2 pgs.)2
07/01/1997Comments concerning Fresh Look implementation filed on behalf of City of Columbus by G. Dunn. (7 pgs.)7
06/30/1997Letter requesting that the Commission adapt Fresh Look Provisions to coincide with Number Portability in Ohio, filed on behalf of Eastland Telecommunications Consulting by S. Longenecker. (1 pg.)1
06/02/1997Additional information filed on behalf of applicant by N. Hawthorne. (3 pgs.)3
05/29/1997Reply filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by T. Stein. (7 pgs.)7
05/29/1997Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (11 pg.)11
05/28/1997Reply comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. regard- ing implementation of Fresh Look filed by B. Kahn. (11 pgs)11
05/28/1997"Fresh Look" reply by Telecommunications Resellers Associa- tion filed by S. Bloomfield. (5 pgs.)5
05/28/1997Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P.'s reply comments filed by R. Rosenberry, M. Schermer. (10 pgs.)10
05/28/1997Reply comments of NextLink Ohio, L.L.C. filed by D. Clayton. (13 pgs.)13
05/28/1997Reply comments of GTE North Incorporated regarding "Fresh Look" filed by J. Kennedy. (7 pgs.)7
05/28/1997Reply comments of OCOM Corporation filed by W. Adams. (9pgs)9
05/28/1997Ameritech Ohio's Reply filed by M. Mulcahy. (13 pgs.)13
05/22/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)4
05/22/1997Questions and proposed answers filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (34 pgs.)34
05/22/1997Comments filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by T. Stein. (12 pgs.)12
05/22/1997Comments and additional questions filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (12 pgs.)12
05/22/1997Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (11 pgs.)11
05/22/1997Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.)10
05/22/1997Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer. (9 pgs.)9
05/22/1997Comments filed on behlaf of CBG Telecommunications by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
05/22/1997Comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (8 pgs.)8
05/22/1997Initial comments filed on behalf of OCOM Corp. by W. Adams. (6 pgs.)6
05/22/1997Responses filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by D. Mennenga. (4 pgs.)4
05/12/1997Notice of Operation filed on behalf of applicant by T. Stein. (3 pgs.)3
04/23/1997Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)5
04/10/1997Certificate No. 90-9001 issued. (1 pg.)12
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted in accor- dance with Finding 3; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the appli- cations for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. (7 pgs.)7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.8
03/04/1997Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.)14
03/03/1997Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
03/03/1997Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
02/28/1997Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
02/27/1997Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, original pages 1.3, 1.5, 2.25, and 13.2, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Kraus. (5 pgs.)5
02/21/1997Tariffs, PUCO No. 1 and PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (175 pgs.)175
02/18/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)9
01/16/1997Supplemental Finding & Order that this case is partially suspended pending review of the tariffs which will be auto- matically approved and this case closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997. (13 pgs.)13
09/23/1996Affidavits of Marguerite A. Forrest and John C. Shapleigh filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)3
09/19/1996Opinion & Order granting the application to the extent set forth in this Order; that a certificate be issued to Brooks; that Brooks file in this docket, by 9/26/96, an affidavit signed by two appropriate officers of Brooks Fiber attesting that sufficient financial resources will be available at all times to the certified entity to satisfy its public utility obligations as determined by Title 49 of the Re- vised Code and this Commission; that this docket shall re- main open for consideration of additional issues. (9 pgs.)9
08/06/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 7/23/96, (DF), 20 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, OH-PUCO)20
07/15/1996Letter stipulating that it does not take issue with the applicant's ability to meet the managerial, financial, and technical qualifications required for certification, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)2
07/12/1996Testimony of Martin W. Clift, Jr. filed on behalf of applicant S. Bloomfield. (15 pgs.)15
07/12/1996Revised Exhibit 4 to the application, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)3
07/02/1996Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (2 pgs.)2
07/02/1996Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 7/23/96 at the Commission offices; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 7/16/96 at the Commission offices; that the motions to intervene filed by OCC and Ameritech are granted; that the motion to intervene filed by CBT is denied; that all discovery be completed by the parties by 7/10/96; that Brooks shall file its direct, expert testimony to be pre- sented in support of its application and serve a copy upon all parties by 7/12/96; expert testimony to be presented by any other party at the hearing must be filed and served upon all parties by 7/19/96. (AE) (7 pgs.)7
06/26/1996Reply to memorandum contra motions to intervene and requests for hearing, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (3 pgs.)3
06/26/1996Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (4 pgs.)4
06/26/1996Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)4
06/11/1996Memorandum contra motions to intervene and requests for oral hearing filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloom- field. (9 pgs.)9
05/28/1996Motion to intervene and request for oral hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs.)5
05/28/1996Motion to intervene and request for hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)5
05/28/1996Motion to intervene and request for oral hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by R. Pace, Sr. (4 pgs.)4
05/10/1996Proof of Publication filed by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.) (Wood County, Lucas County)3
04/18/1996Entry ordering that Brooks cause publication of the legal notice by 4/26/96 and file proof of the publications by 6/26/96; that any interested person, firm, corporation, or entity wishing to intervene shall file a motion for inter- vention and an accompanying memorandum in support by 5/28/96; that Brooks file a response to any motions for intervention by 6/11/96; that any reply to Brooks' response be filed by 6/26/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
04/05/1996In the matter of the application of Brooks Fiber Communi- cations of Ohio, Inc. for a certificate of public con- venience and necessity to provide local exchange and dial- tone services and non switched private line services. (114 pgs.)114