|
11/10/1997
|
Update to service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (1 pg.) |
|
11/06/1997
|
Entry ordering that the September 11, 1997 Opinion & Order is clarified to the extent set forth in this entry, and the applications for rehearing of Ameritech, Sprint, MCI, and AT&T are granted to the extent set forth in this entry; that this case be closed of record. |
|
10/30/1997
|
Update to service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (1 pg.) |
|
10/24/1997
|
Memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for re- hearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (7 pgs.) |
|
10/24/1997
|
Memorandum contra joint application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) |
|
10/22/1997
|
Joint memorandum contra application for rehearing of Ameri- tech Ohio, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins; and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by B. Royer and D. Townsley. (13 pgs.) |
|
10/20/1997
|
Memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.) |
|
10/14/1997
|
Joint application for rehearing filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins; and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by B. Royer and D. Townsley. |
|
10/14/1997
|
Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by J. Kelly. (24 pgs.) |
|
10/10/1997
|
Application for rehearing and/or request for clarification of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) |
|
09/11/1997
|
Opinion & Order that AT&T's motion to intervene for the purpose of filing comments, exceptions, and replies is granted; that the renewed request by Sprint and MCI to reopen the record is denied; that this complaint is granted in part and denied in part; that Ameritech shall submit its proposed customer notice to the Commission within 90 days of this order; Ameritech shall implement the means by which to comply with the directives within 120 days of this order; that Ameritech shall cease and desist from disseminating less than accurate information regarding PPC. (37 pgs.) |
|
09/08/1997
|
Copy of September 5, 1997, Order of the Illinois Appellate Court, First Judicial District in Case Nos. 1-96-2146 and 1-96-2166, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (24 pgs.) |
|
04/09/1997
|
Reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AT&T's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.) |
|
03/27/1997
|
Reply to exceptions and reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (16 pgs.) |
|
03/27/1997
|
Joint reply to exceptions and comments of Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. by M. Jenkins; and MCI Telecommunications by D. Townsley and B. Royer. (12 pgs.) |
|
03/27/1997
|
Reply to comments and exceptions filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (7 pgs.) |
|
03/27/1997
|
Memorandum contra AT&T's motion to intervene, filed on be- half of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.) |
|
03/18/1997
|
Corrected joint exceptions to Attorney Examiner's report filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. by M. Jenkins; and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by B. Royer. (11 pgs.) |
|
03/12/1997
|
Exceptions to Attorney Examiner's report and initial com- ments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (42 pgs.) |
|
03/12/1997
|
Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on be- half of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) |
|
03/12/1997
|
Comments and exceptions filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations by B. Kahn. (9 pgs.) |
|
03/12/1997
|
Joint comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications by M. Jenkins; and MCI Telecommunications by D. Townsley and B. Royer. (9 pgs.) |
|
03/12/1997
|
Joint exceptions to Attorney Examiner's report filed on behalf of Sprint Communications by M. Jenkins; MCI Tele- communications by D. Townsley and B. Royer. (10 pgs.) |
|
02/20/1997
|
Entry ordering that the motion to reopen the record is granted for the limited purpose of allowing the parties to file comments; that the parties may file exceptions to the attached attorney examiner's report and comments regarding the issues set forth in Finding 9 by March 12, 1997, and file replies to the exceptions/comments by March 27, 1997. (29 pgs.) |
|
02/18/1997
|
Joint reply of Sprint Communications Company L.P., MCI Telecommunications Corporation, and The Ohio Consumers' Counsel to Ameritech Ohio memorandum contra motion to reopen filed by M. Jenkins, D. Townsley, E. Robinson-McGriff, B. Royer. (9 pgs.) |
|
02/10/1997
|
Memorandum contra joint motion to reopen filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) |
|
01/21/1997
|
Joint motion to reopen and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. by M. Jenkins; OCC by E. Robinson-McGriff; MCI Telecommunications by D. Townsley and B. Royer. (11 pgs.) |
|
01/15/1997
|
Letter regarding Ameritech Ohio's slamming protection pro- gram, filed by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.) |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief of MCI filed by D. Townsley and B. Royer. |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief of the PUCO filed by S. Reilly. |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (29 pgs.) |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (19 pgs.) |
|
08/27/1996
|
Letter stating that OCC will not file a reply brief in this proceeding, filed by E. Robinson-McGriff. (1 pg.) |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (21 pgs.) |
|
08/27/1996
|
Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant by M. Jenkins. (13 pgs.) |
|
08/20/1996
|
Initial post hearing brief of MCI filed by D. Townsley and B. Royer |
|
08/20/1996
|
Post hearing brief of the PUCO filed by P. Colbert and S. Reilly. |
|
08/20/1996
|
Initial joint brief of Sprint and OCC filed by W. Adams and E. Robinson-McGriff |
|
08/20/1996
|
Initial joint brief filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by W. Adams, and OCC by E. Robinson-McGriff. (43 pgs.) |
|
08/20/1996
|
Initial brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (104 pgs.) |
|
08/20/1996
|
Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of MCI Telecom- munications Corp. by D. Townsley and B. Royer. (35 pgs.) |
|
08/20/1996
|
Post-hearing bried filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by P. Colbert and S. Reilly. (11 pgs.) |
|
08/12/1996
|
Letter stating that counsel for all the parties actively participating in this proceeding have agreed to a one-week extension of the dates previously established for filing post-hearing briefs, filed by B. Royer. (1 pg.) |
|
08/12/1996
|
Letter stating that counsel for all the parties actively participating in this case have agreed to a one-week extension of the dates previously established for filing post-hearing briefs, filed by B. Royer. (1 pg.) |
|
08/12/1996
|
Letter stating all parties have agreed to a one week extension of time for filing briefs filed by B. Royer, MCI. |
|
08/02/1996
|
A copy of the 8/1/96 Opinion and Order of the Michigan Public Service Commission along with the dissenting opinion of Commissioner John C. Shea filed by J. Kelly of Ameritech Ohio. |
|
08/02/1996
|
Copy of the August 1, 1996, Opinion and Order of the Michigan Public Service Commission in Case No. U-11038, along with the dissenting opinion of Commissioner John C. Shea, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (31 pgs.) |
|
07/22/1996
|
Transcript filed for hearing held 7/16/96, (GP), 59 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, Ohio) (Volume II) |
|
07/22/1996
|
A corrected transcript ASCII disk, page 58, and late-filed Exhibit No. 3 filed by L. Riffle of McGinnis Court Reporting & Forensic Video |
|
07/22/1996
|
Corrected ASCII disk and page 58 of the transcript from the hearing taken on June 27, 1996, and Sprint's late-filed Exhibit No. 3, filed by McGinnis & Associates by L. Riffle. (6 pgs.) |
|
07/20/1996
|
Initial brief of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly. |
|
07/16/1996
|
Exhibit DLR-14 to the rebuttal testimony of MCI witness Dennis L. Ricca, filed on behalf of MCI by B. Royer. (8 pgs.) |
|
07/16/1996
|
Exhibit DLR-14 to the rebuttal testimony of Dennis L. Ricca filed by B. Royer on behalf of MCI. |
|
07/15/1996
|
Motion to strike filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech Ohio |
|
07/15/1996
|
Motion to strike and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (24 pgs.) |
|
07/11/1996
|
Rebuttal testimony of Dennis L. Ricca filed by B. Royer on behalf of MCI. |
|
07/11/1996
|
Rebuttal testimony of Dennis L. Ricca filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by B. Royer. (44 pgs.) |
|
07/11/1996
|
Rebuttal testimony of Edward K. Phelan filed on behalf of Sprint Communications by W. Adams. (9 pgs.) |
|
07/11/1996
|
Rebuttal testimony of Edward K. Phelan filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint |
|
07/08/1996
|
Transcipt for hearing held on June 27, 1996, (GP), 262 pgs. Vol. 1, cont. |
|
06/26/1996
|
Motion to strike testimony, filed on behalf of Sprint Communication Company L.P. by W. Adams. |
|
06/26/1996
|
Motion to strike testimony and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant, Sprint Communication, by W. Adams. (10 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Stipulations of fact filed |
|
06/24/1996
|
Motion and memorandum in support to strike testimony filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint. |
|
06/24/1996
|
Testimony of Richard C. Reese on behalf of PUCO. |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Edward K. Phelan on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. |
|
06/24/1996
|
Notice of Michigan proposal for decision filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint. |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Michael B. Suthers on behalf of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Lynne Thomson on behalf of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Dennis L. Ricca on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by J. Sanders |
|
06/24/1996
|
Testimony of Richard C. Reese filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by P. Colbert. (7 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Edward K. Phelan filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. (13 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s notice of Michigan proposal for decision filed by W. Adams. (24 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Michael B. Suthers filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (36 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Jason Few filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (20 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Lynne Thomson filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (74 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Direct testimony of Dennis L. Ricca filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (71 pgs.) |
|
06/24/1996
|
Stipulations of fact filed on behalf of complainant, Sprint Communications Co., by W. Adams; respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly; and the PUCO staff by P. Colbert. (30 pgs.) |
|
06/21/1996
|
Letter stating that the PUCO staff intends to file testimony on June 24, 1996 in this matter filed on behalf of the PUCO staff, by S. Reilly. (1 pg.) |
|
06/21/1996
|
Letter stating Paul Colbert and Stephen Reilly will represent the PUCO in this case filed by Mr. Reilly. |
|
06/17/1996
|
Proof of publication filed (Cuyahoga county) |
|
06/17/1996
|
Proof of Publication filed. (Cuhahoga County) (1 pg.) |
|
06/14/1996
|
Service Notice. |
|
06/13/1996
|
Entry denying Sprint's motion to limit the issues at the June 27, 1996 hearing. (AE) (4 pgs.) |
|
06/11/1996
|
Reply memorandum in support of its motion to limit issues at hearing, filed on behalf of complainant, Sprint Communica- tions, by W. Adams. (4 pgs.) |
|
06/11/1996
|
Reply memorandum in support of its motion to limit issues at hearing filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint |
|
06/03/1996
|
Memorandum contra motion to limit issues at hearing filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech. |
|
05/31/1996
|
Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed by E. Robinson-McGriff on behalf of OCC. |
|
05/31/1996
|
Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by E. Robinson-McGriff. (2 pgs.) |
|
05/29/1996
|
Legal Notices (Faxed) to: Columbus Dispatch (Franklin Co.) & Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.). |
|
05/29/1996
|
Service Notice |
|
05/28/1996
|
Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 6/27/96 at the Commission offices; that the motions to intervene of D&S and MCI are granted; that Ameritech's motion to dismiss is denied; that reasonable grounds for complaint have been stated; that any party intending to present direct, expert testimony should file such testimony and serve it upon all parties by 6/24/96. (AE) (6 pgs.) |
|
05/28/1996
|
Entry granting motions to intervene of D&S and MCI; Ameritech's motion to dismiss is denied; a hearing will be held 6/27/96, 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices; direct, expert testimony should be filed no later than 6/24/96. (AE) |
|
05/24/1996
|
Reply of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
05/16/1996
|
Memorandum contra motion to dismiss filed by J. Sanders and D. Townsley on behalf of MCI. |
|
05/16/1996
|
Memorandum of MCI Telecommunications Corporation contra motion to dismiss filed by J. Sanders, D. Townsley. (5 pgs.) |
|
05/14/1996
|
Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint. |
|
05/14/1996
|
Motion to limit issues at hearing on its complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by W. Adams. (70 pgs.) |
|
05/14/1996
|
Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by W. Adams. (6 pgs.) |
|
05/13/1996
|
Response to motions to intervene filed by Dial & Save of Ohio, Inc. and MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.) |
|
05/13/1996
|
Response to motions to intervene filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech. |
|
05/07/1996
|
Entry ordering that the second settlement conference shall be held at 1:30 p.m. on 6/20/96 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
04/29/1996
|
Answer of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
04/29/1996
|
Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (18 pgs.) |
|
04/29/1996
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.) |
|
04/25/1996
|
Letter withdrawing answer and motion to dismiss filed 3/5/96 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech. |
|
04/24/1996
|
Motion of MCI Telecommunications Corporation for leave to intervene filed byJ. Sanders and D. Townsley |
|
04/24/1996
|
Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley. (6 pgs.) |
|
04/19/1996
|
Entry granting OCC's motion to intervene; a settlement conference will be held 5/3/96, 1:30 p.m. at the Commission offices. (AE) |
|
04/19/1996
|
Entry granting OCC's motion to intervene; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on 5/3/96 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
04/08/1996
|
Entry granting Sprint's motion to file an amended complaint; amended complaint filed 4/5/96 is accepted for filing; Ameritech has until 4/27/96 to file its answer to the amended complaint. (AE) |
|
04/08/1996
|
Entry ordering that Sprint's request for an expedited ruling is warranted; Sprint's motion for leave to file an amended complaint instanter is granted; that the amended complaint that Sprint filed on April 5, 1996, is accepted for filing as of the date of this entry; that Ameritech shall file an answer to the amended complaint as well as any responsive pleading to the amended com- plaint by 4/27/96. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
04/05/1996
|
Motion for leave to file amended complaint instanter and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by W. Adams. (4 pgs.) |
|
04/05/1996
|
First amended complaint, filed on behalf of complainant by W. Adams. (32 pgs.) |
|
04/05/1996
|
Motion and memorandum in support for leave to filed amended complaint instanter and request for expedited ruling filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint. |
|
04/05/1996
|
First amended complaint against Ameritech Ohio filed by W. Adams on behalf of Sprint |
|
04/02/1996
|
Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Dial & Save of Ohio, Inc. dba Dial & Save by R. Blau. (4 pgs.) |
|
04/02/1996
|
Motion to intervene of Dial & Save of Ohio, Inc. dba Dial & Save filed by R. Blau |
|
03/21/1996
|
Entry ordering that Sprint's request for an expedited ruling is warranted. Sprint's motion for an extension of time is granted and it shall now have until April 8, 1996 to file a memorandum in response to Ameritech's motion to dismiss the complaint. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
03/21/1996
|
Entry granting Sprint's motion for extension of time until 4/8/96 to file memorandum in response to Ameritech's motion to dismiss. (AE) |
|
03/20/1996
|
Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of Sprint Communications by D. Stin- son. (5 pgs.) |
|
03/20/1996
|
Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed by D. Stinson on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. |
|
03/11/1996
|
Response of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
03/11/1996
|
Letter of response to OCC's motion to intervene filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (1 pg.) |
|
03/05/1996
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.) |
|
03/05/1996
|
Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (21 pgs.) |
|
03/05/1996
|
Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. |
|
03/05/1996
|
Answer of Ameritech Ohio filed by J.Kelly. |
|
02/22/1996
|
Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of OCC. |
|
02/22/1996
|
Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (6 pgs.) |
|
02/14/1996
|
Complaint service letter and copy of complaint sent to Jon Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. |
|
02/14/1996
|
Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.) |
|
02/13/1996
|
In the matter of the complaint of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable misleading of consumers and impos- ing restrictions on regulated telephone service without the authority of the Public Utilities Commission. (19 pgs.) |
|
02/13/1996
|
In the matter of the complaint of Sprint Communications L.P. (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable misleading of consumers and imposing restrictions on regulated telephone service without the authority of the PUCO. |