|
08/22/1996
|
Entry ordering that the Commission's July 12, 1996 partial suspension of CBT's request for confidential treatment be lifted. (2 pgs.) |
|
08/06/1996
|
Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 6, 2nd page 6, filed on behalf of applicant by T. McCloud. |
|
08/06/1996
|
Tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 6, 2nd page 6, filed on behalf of applicant by T. McCloud. (2 pgs.) |
|
08/01/1996
|
Amended Section 6, 2nd revised page 6, filed on behalf of applicant by T. McCloud. (2 pgs.) |
|
07/18/1996
|
Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by CBT. (3 pgs.) |
|
07/15/1996
|
Service notice filed. |
|
07/15/1996
|
Service Notice. |
|
07/12/1996
|
Entry ordering that approval of the request for confidential treatment is partially suspended until the Commission speci- fically orders otherwise; the proposed tariff is permitted to take effect on July 14, 1996, subject to continued review by the Commission. (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
07/08/1996
|
Motion of The Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel for leave to file an amicus curiae memorandum contra The Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's application for rehearing filed by A. Kelsey. (5 pgs.) |
|
07/08/1996
|
Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by A. Kelsey. (6 pgs.) |
|
06/28/1996
|
Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. |
|
06/28/1996
|
Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. |
|
06/28/1996
|
Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by C. Wilson. (8 pgs.) |
|
06/14/1996
|
Amended tariff, PUCO No. 2, 2nd page 6, filed on behalf of applicant by E. Frank. (2 pgs.) |
|
05/30/1996
|
Finding & Order granting the application and ordering that the PRIME Advantage service rate elements currently classi- fied in Cell 1 are appropriately classified in Cell 1 and shall remain as Cell 1 services until CBT demonstrates that these rate elements are no longer a monopoly access service; that CBT is permitted to file its proposed new price range for the PRIME Advantage rate elements in question within 15 days from the date of issuance of this order; that AT&T's objection to the proposed cell classification are moot. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. (6 pgs.) |
|
03/04/1996
|
Request that the Commission issue an order concluding its investigation and granting CBT's request to reclassify, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Martin. |
|
03/04/1996
|
Request for prompt resolution of this matter filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by J. Martin. |
|
03/04/1996
|
Letter requesting that the Commission issue an order concluding its investigation of this case and granting applicant's request to reclassify as soon as possible, filed by J. Martin. (2 pgs.) |
|
02/02/1996
|
Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspended pending the Commission's determination as to the reasonableness of the cell reclassification issue. (AE) |
|
02/02/1996
|
Entry ordering that approval of this application is parti- ally suspended, pending the Commission's determination as to the reasonableness of the cell reclassification issue presented and/or until the Commission specifically orders otherwise; that under the partial suspension, CBT may con- tinue, for an indefinite period until the Commission orders otherwise, to offer its PRIME Advantage service under the cell classification scheme established in Case No. 94-1910- TP-ATA (and subject to the Cell 1 price flexibility criteria first established in the April 3, 1995 entry in Case No. 94-1910-TP-ATA); that CBT reissue its tariff sheets to reflect that the cell classifications and pricing flexibil- ity mechanisms established in Case No. 94-1910-TP-ATA shall remain in effect, unless the Commission specifically orders otherwise, pending the Commission's disposition of Case No. 96-04-TP-ATA, which was filed by the company on January 3, 1996 and partially suspended by the Commission by entry dated February 2, 1996. (AE) (4 pgs.) |
|
01/30/1996
|
Objections filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by R. Quinn, Jr. and W. Newcomb, Jr. |
|
01/30/1996
|
Objection of AT&T to application to change cell classification filed by R. Quinn, Jr. and W. Newcomb, Jr. |
|
01/30/1996
|
Objection of AT&T to application to change cell classificat- ion filed by R. Quinn, Jr., W. Newcomb, Jr. (4 pgs.) |
|
01/03/1996
|
In the matter of the application of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company for authority to revise its exchange rate tariff, PUCO No. 2, to change the Cell Classification for certain PRIME Advantage Rate Elements. |
|
01/03/1996
|
In the matter of the application of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone Company for authority to revise its exchange rate tariff No. 2 to change the cell classification for certain Prime Advantage rate elements. (8 pgs.) |