|
11/09/1995
|
Entry ordering that the stipulation, as amended, is approved, and dismissing the complaint and closing this case of record. (11 pgs.) |
|
11/03/1995
|
Amended stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by R. Perry, and respondent, Toledo Edison, by J. Wack, submitted by M. Kempic. (9 pgs.) |
|
09/11/1995
|
Joint motion to approve and adopt the amended stipulation and recommendation and to dismiss this case and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Perry; and respondent, Toledo Edison, by M. Kempic. (4 pgs.) |
|
09/11/1995
|
Amended stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by R. Perry; and respondent, Toledo Edison, by J. Wack. (14 pgs.) |
|
07/13/1995
|
Joint motion to approve and adopt the stipulation and recommendation and to dismiss this complaint and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Perry and respondent, Toledo Edison, by M. Kempic. (21 pgs.) |
|
05/19/1995
|
Transcript filed for hearing held 5/11/95, (SF), 5 pgs., Con't. |
|
04/04/1995
|
Legal Notice sent to: The Expositor (Fulton Co.) Certified Mail. |
|
03/29/1995
|
Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 5/11/95 at the Commission offices; scheduling a settlement confer- ence at 10:00 a.m. on 4/27/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.) |
|
03/15/1995
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by R. McLaren. (7 pgs.) |
|
02/22/1995
|
Entry denying respondent's motion to dismiss the complaint; that respondent file its written answer within 20 days of the filing of this entry. (2 pgs.) |
|
01/20/1995
|
Reply to motion to dismiss and memorandum filed on behalf of complainant by R. Perry. (15 pgs.) |
|
01/05/1995
|
Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by R. Mclaren. (8 pgs.) |
|
12/16/1994
|
Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Toledo Edison, office of the president. |
|
12/09/1994
|
In the matter of the complaint of Randald N. Perry (vs) Toledo Edison Company relative to the alleged unjust, unreasonable, and unfair refusal of Toledo Edison to furnish electric service to electric load centers, where- ever located within its certified territory. (17 pgs.) |