| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 08/20/2009 | Confidential Release: Cincinnati Bell Telephone's exhibit N filed June 23, 1995. | 101 |
| 08/20/2009 | Confidential Release: Cincinnati Bell Telephone's exhibit M filed June 23, 1995. | 6 |
| 08/20/2009 | Confidential Release: Cincinnati Bell Telephone's exhibit K filed June 23, 1995. | 6 |
| 08/20/2009 | Confidential Release: Cincinnati Bell Telephone's exhibit L filed June 23, 1995. | 10 |
| 08/20/2009 | Confidential Release: Reply brief of Time Warner Communications of Ohio L P and Time Warner AXS filed July 14, 1995. | 6 |
| 06/02/1999 | Local and private line tariffs, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of applicant by C. Wightman. (66 pgs.) | 66 |
| 05/21/1999 | Amended Certificate No. 90-9011 issued. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/12/1999 | Entry granting Time Warner's motion to extend the time in which it must serve five counties in its local service area; Time Warner is now required to be able to provide local services in Clinton, Delaware, Marion, Montgomery, and Union counties by November 12, 1999; that Time Warner's request to remove 27 counties from its local serving area is granted; that the joint application to transfer TWAxS' operating authority to Time Warner is granted; that Certi- ficate No. 90-9011 be amended to reflect its current local serving area and its authority to provide competitive access provider services in Butler, Clermont,Hamilton, and Warren counties; that Time Warner's tariff revisions are hereby approved; that TWAxS' Certificate No. 90-5183 and tariff No. 90-5183-CT-TRF are hereby canceled; that TWAxS be removed from the list of Commission-regulated entities; that this case is closed of record. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 11/23/1998 | Motion for an extension of time and to remove certain counties from Time Warner's certificate of public con- venience and necessity and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 11/23/1998 | Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of appli- cant by L. Reardon. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 07/14/1998 | Fresh Look Notice filed on behalf of applicant by T. McCloud. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 02/17/1998 | Certificate No. 90-9011 issued. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 01/13/1998 | Certificate No. 90-9011 issued. (1 pg.) (ISSUED 1/12/98) | 1 |
| 11/21/1997 | Fresh look noitce filed on behalf of applicant by T. Cloud. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 07/25/1997 | Fresh Look Notice filed on behalf of applicant by R. Miracle. (1 pg.) (FILED 7/24/97) | 1 |
| 07/21/1997 | Returned from Supreme Court, 7 Vols.- Destroyed, (1) Confidential returned. | 0 |
| 07/16/1997 | Change of address filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/08/1997 | Correction to letter filed on July 7, 1997, stating in- correct operational date; correct date should be July 2, 1997, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/07/1997 | Notice of completion of the interconnection agreement with Ameritech Ohio, which was completed June 2, 1997, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/28/1997 | Local and Access tariff with an effective date of May 28, 1997 filed on behalf of applicant by C. Wightman. (204 pgs) | 204 |
| 05/22/1997 | Second Supplemental Finding & Order that the proposed tariffs of Time Warner to provide facilities-based local exchange service and other related telecommunications ser- vices be approved and that Time Warner is authorized to pro- vide telecommunication services in Ameritech exchange areas within Delaware, Franklin, Madison, Marion, and Union Coun- ties; that Time Warner comply with the 24 month serving area requirement outlined in Finding 5; that Time Warner notify the Commission of the roll-out of service in its authorized service territory; that Time Warner continue to abide by the affiliate transaction requirements set forth in 845 Guide- line VI.B; that this case be closed of record. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 05/20/1997 | Revised end-user tariff reflecting modifications filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (117 pgs.) | 117 |
| 05/13/1997 | Revised carrier-to-carrier and end-user tariffs reflecting modifications requested by the Staff, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (234 pgs.) | 234 |
| 04/24/1997 | Application of appellant, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., to dimiss appeal, filed by J. Harrison. (4 pgs.) (FILED ON 4/23/97 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 95-845-TP-COI) | 4 |
| 04/24/1997 | Proposed revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, original pages 1 thru 108, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (117 pgs.) | 117 |
| 04/23/1997 | Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 03/26/1997 | Proposed tariffs, PUCO No. 1 and 2, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (197 pgs.) | 197 |
| 03/07/1997 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 03/06/1997 | Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. | 7 |
| 03/06/1997 | Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. | 8 |
| 03/04/1997 | Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 03/03/1997 | Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 03/03/1997 | Entry ordering that this case shall remain partially sus- pended for an indefinite period, pending tariff approval by the Commission. (AE) (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 02/28/1997 | Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 02/28/1997 | Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 02/28/1997 | Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 02/18/1997 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 01/16/1997 | Supplemental Finding & Order that if the company files their proposed tariffs by January 31, 1997, such tariffs shall be automatically approved and this docket shall be closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997. (13 pgs.) | 13 |
| 03/08/1996 | Update on the status of interconnection negotiations between Cincinnati Bell and Time Warner, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Marshall. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 02/15/1996 | Request for interconnection negotiations with Ameritech Ohio filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 01/16/1996 | Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (26 pgs.) | 26 |
| 01/02/1996 | Report concerning the interconnection discussions with Time Warner, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 12/26/1995 | Second 60-day report on status of interconnection negotia- tions, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 12/22/1995 | Notice of appeal filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (49 pgs.) (S.C. No. 95-2622) | 49 |
| 12/22/1995 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (49 pgs.) (S.C. No. 95-2621) | 49 |
| 12/15/1995 | Notice of appeal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone Company by W. Hawkins II. (7 pgs.) (S.C. #95-2576) | 7 |
| 12/13/1995 | Correspondnece letter regarding the application, filed by J. Bennett. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 11/22/1995 | Entry on Rehearing ordering that the application for rehear- ing filed by the City of Cincinnati and the Intercommunity Cable Regulatory Commission are denied. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 11/16/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by J. Schmidt. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 11/16/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by W. Balmer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 11/06/1995 | Memorandum contra City of Cincinnati's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 11/06/1995 | Intercommunity Cable Regulatory Commission support of City of Cincinnati's application for rehearing, filed by J. Baldwin. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 11/01/1995 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 10/31/1995 | Letter reporting on the status of Ameritech Ohio's and Time Warner's negotiations to reach an interconnection agreement, filed by M. Mulcahy. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 10/31/1995 | Correspondence letter in support of the application, filed by J. Schmidt. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 10/30/1995 | Letter stating that Ameritech's concerns have not been substantiated and that the commission should deny Ameritech request that Time Warner submit an amended affidavit filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 10/25/1995 | Entry denying the applications for rehearing. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 10/24/1995 | Status report on progress in interconnection negotiations, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 10/16/1995 | Letter in response to affidavit filed by Time Warner Communications Holdings, submitted on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 10/10/1995 | Correction to the service list filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Jenkins. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 10/05/1995 | Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf on applicant by D. Clayton. (18 pgs.) | 18 |
| 10/05/1995 | Memorandum contra applications for rehearing of the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by A. Kelsey. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 09/27/1995 | Response letter to Ms. Jacquelyn E. Way, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing and memorandun in support filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by T. Lodge. (43 pgs.) | 43 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 09/25/1995 | Affidavit of Marsh Rockey Schermer filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by W. Hawkins. (26 pgs.) | 26 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 09/25/1995 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Alltel Companies (Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve) by T. Lodge. (42 pgs.) | 42 |
| 09/21/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by G. Beal. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 09/21/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by C. Sears. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 09/21/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by S. Smith. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 09/21/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Way. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 09/18/1995 | Letter stating that the intervenor in this case, TCG America, Inc., is now known as TCG Cleveland, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 08/24/1995 | Opinion and Order that the application of Time Warner is granted to the extent set forth above and CBT's motion to dismiss is denied, that Time Warner and the relevant LECs begin negotiations relating to interconnection agreements as set forth above and that Time Warner and the relevant LEC's report the status of any negotiations as set forth above, that Time Warner's motion to strike is denied. | 30 |
| 08/11/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by D. Bay, Cable Express. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 08/08/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by W. Balmer. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 08/02/1995 | Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed on behalf of several various consumers. (152 pgs.) | 152 |
| 07/31/1995 | Correspondence letters continued. (28 pgs.) | 28 |
| 07/31/1995 | Correspondence letters continued. | 98 |
| 07/31/1995 | Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by several various consumers. (88 pgs.) | 88 |
| 07/28/1995 | Correspondence letters continued. (45 pgs.) | 45 |
| 07/28/1995 | Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by several various consumers. (149 pgs.) | 149 |
| 07/28/1995 | Letter in response to Time Warner reply brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by W. Hawkins II. (2pgs) | 2 |
| 07/28/1995 | Various correspondence letters in support of the local tele- phone competition. (70 pgs.) | 70 |
| 07/24/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by O. H. Koeplin, Executive Director of Wapakoneta Area Economic Development Council, Inc. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 07/24/1995 | Letter requesting that the Commission strike from CBT's reply brief the paragraph beginning on page 28 with the words "In contrast, there is..." through the carryover sentence at the top of page 29 with the words concluding the paragraph "...from the standards", filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/21/1995 | Letter in support of competition in the local telephone services marketplace filed on behalf of Cable Express by D. Bay. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Westerkamm. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by D. Berry. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by C. Scott Williams. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Hedges. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by K. McQuaide. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by P. Casa. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by R. Ramsier. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by E. Westerkamm. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by K. Westerkamm. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by S. Thacker. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/19/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by D. Bay. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/17/1995 | Confidential section of reply brief of applicants Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS filed by R. Rosenberry. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL ON 7/14/95) | 4 |
| 07/17/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (15 pgs.) | 15 |
| 07/17/1995 | Correction to the reply brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. et al. by R. Rosen- berry. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of the City of Cincinnati filed by R. Ganulin. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 07/14/1995 | Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc.'s reply brief filed by D. Conway. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of Telephone Service Company filed by T. Lodge. (17 pgs.) | 17 |
| 07/14/1995 | First phase reply brief of Ameritech Ohio filed by M. Mulcahy. (13 pgs.) | 13 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply Brief of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company filed by T. Lodge. (17 pgs.) | 17 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief by Cablevision Lightpath-Oh, Inc. filed by M. Christensen. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company on issues designated for phase one filed by W. Hawkins II. (77 pgs.) | 77 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of applicants Time Warner Communications of Ohio L.P. and Time Warner AxS filed by R. Rosenberry. (52 pgs.) | 52 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by A. Kelsey. (27 pgs.) | 27 |
| 07/14/1995 | Letter stating that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assoc- iation will not be filing a reply brief filed by S. Howard. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/14/1995 | Reply brief of the City of Columbus filed by R. O'Brien, J. Klein III, G. Dunn. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 07/14/1995 | Letter stating MCI Telecommunications Corporation and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Inc. hereby incorporate filed by J. Sanders. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/13/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of The Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 07/13/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 07/13/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 07/11/1995 | Additional signature page for Joint Exhibit 1, stipulation and recommendation, filed on behalf of Cablevision Light- path-OH, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 07/10/1995 | Table of Contents for the post-hearing brief which was inadvertently omitted from the brief filed 7/7/95, filed on behalf of applicant and Time Warner AxS by R. Rosen- berry. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Letter stating that the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition incorporates by reference the legal argument it expressed in the brief filed in the first phase of Case No. 94-2019- TP-ACE, and incorporates by reference the elaboration of that legal argument expressed in its reply brief filed in the same case on June 22, 1995, filed by E. Jacobs. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of the City of Cin- cinnati by R. Ganulin. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Joint Exhibit 1, stipulation and recommendation, with an additional signature page indicating that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. is now a signatory, filed by S. Howard. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecom- munications Assn. by S. Howard. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Joint Exhibit 1, stipulation and recommendation, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Randazzo; AT&T Communications by R. Quinn, Jr.; OCC by A. Kelsey; Sprint Communications by M. Arendes; and the City of Columbus by G. Dunn. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by T. Lodge. (27 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and The West- ern Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (28 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders. (13 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Brief filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by R. O-Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief in phase I filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | First phase brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (12 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of applicant and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo. (48 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of Cablevision Lightpath-OH, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (15 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief on issues designated for phase one filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by W. Hawkins. (61 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of The Columbus Grove Tele- phone Co. by J. Prohaska. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Letter stating that the Chillicothe Telephone Co. will not be filing an initial brief, filed by A. Korkosz. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Letter incorporating the brief filed in the MFS proceeding filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by W. Newcomb, Jr. (23 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (21 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/07/1995 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Century Telephone Co. by D. Conway. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/06/1995 | Composite Index for hearings May 31, 1995 through June 23, 1995, Volumes I through V. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 07/06/1995 | Transcript filed for hearing held 6/23/95, (JV), 103 pgs., Submitted. (Volume V) | 0 |
| 06/30/1995 | Correspondence letter filed by B. Smuckler. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 06/28/1995 | Several correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by B. Myers and various consumers. (90 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/27/1995 | Several correspondence letters filed by C.E. Brush and various consumers. (191 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/23/1995 | Cincinnati Bell's Exhibits K, L, M, & N filed. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 0 |
| 06/22/1995 | Rebuttal testimony of Danny G. Engleman filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (20 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/22/1995 | Letter asking for Ohio's local telephone customers the opportunity to select their supplier based upon their evaluation of the supplier's price filed on behalf of IEU Ohio by M. Swansiger. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/22/1995 | Letter expressing concern on competition in providing tele- phone service filed on behalf of Canton Urban League, Inc. by J. Smith. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 06/16/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by M. Wolfram. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 06/13/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by J. Guard. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 06/13/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by P. Thinnes. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 06/13/1995 | Entry ordering that the protective agreement be amended as set forth in this Entry. (AE) (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/08/1995 | Entry ordering that Time Warners interlocutory appeal is denied, but that the Attorney Examiners Entry of May 30, 1995 is clarified as set forth in Finding (7), that a Conference be held in this matter on June 9, 19995 at 10:00 a.m. to discuss all outstanding issues in this matter in light of our ruling on Time Warners interlocutory appeal. | 19 |
| 06/08/1995 | Transcript filed for hearing held 6/6/95, (JV), 13 pgs., Con't. (Volume IV) | 0 |
| 06/08/1995 | Entry ordering that Time Warner's interlocutory appeal is denied but that the Attorney Examiner's Entry of May 30, 1995 is clarified as set forth in Finding 7; scheduling a conference at 10:00 a.m. on 6/9/95 at the Commission offices. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/07/1995 | Memorandum contra Time Warner Communications of Ohio L.P. and Time Warner AXS' interlocutory appeal and motion to modify, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T Taylor. (16 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/06/1995 | Transcript filed for hearing held 6/2/95, (JV), 96 pgs., Con't. (Volume III) | 0 |
| 06/06/1995 | Transcript filed for hearing held 6/1/95, (JV), 187 pgs., Con't. (Volume II) | 0 |
| 06/06/1995 | Transcript filed for hearing held 5/31/95, (JV), 209 pgs., Con't. (Volume I) | 0 |
| 06/05/1995 | Interlocutory appeal and motion to modify entry and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of applicant and Time Warner AxS by R. Rosenberry. (60 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/01/1995 | Service notice filed. | 11 |
| 06/01/1995 | Official report of the Greater Cincinnati Telecommunications Task Force, filed by L. Blessing, Jr. (539 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/31/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by J. Martin. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/31/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by P. Barry. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Motion to strike prefiled testimony and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (15 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Amended motion to strike or, in the alternative, motion for continuance , filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (14 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Motion to strike portions of the testimony of OCC, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Memorandum contra motions to strike filed by Ameritech Ohio and Alltel/Western Reserve, filed on behalf of appli- cant by R. Rosenberry. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Comments on motions to strike portions of Time Warner's prefiled direct testimony, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Supplemental motion to compel Time Warner to respond to discovery and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. (40 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/30/1995 | Entry ordering that CBT's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. (AE) (14 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/26/1995 | Attachment 1 which was inadvertently omitted from Time Warners memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's motion to compel, filed on behalf of Time Warner by D. Clayton. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/25/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by R. Girvin-Argon. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/25/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by M. Connolly. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/25/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by D. Smith. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Motion of the Alltel Companies to strike portions of the direct prefiled testimony of the applicants or, alternative- ly, for extension of time and continuance and request for expedited ruling filed by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Testimony of Edward J. Marsh, Jr. filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (16 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of F. Ross Pultz filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (18 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (9 pgs.) (filed on 5/23/95) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Dr. Stanford L. Levin filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (38 pgs) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Barbara J. Stonebraker filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (23 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Joseph Warkany filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (26 pgs) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Dr. Bart D. Stuck filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (13 pgs) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of G. Mitchell Wilk filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (16 pgs) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Dr. Richard D. Emmerson filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (42 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct Testimony of Dr. James H. Vanderweide filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (51 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/24/1995 | Direct testimony of Dr. William E. Taylor filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by W. Hawkins II. (58 pgs) | 0 |
| 05/23/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by J. Clark. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/23/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the appliction, filed by M. Behr. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/23/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by M. Spencer. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/22/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Havlik. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/22/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by S. Deiters. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/22/1995 | Motion to strike or in the alternative motion for con- tinuance and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (12 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/22/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed on behalf fo IEU-OH by M. Swansiger. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/19/1995 | Entry ordering that Time Warner's motion to establish a streamlined process for presentation of information filed May 1, 1995 is denied; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 5/26/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/19/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by E. Badger. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/19/1995 | Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's motion to compel, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Rosenberry. (26 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/18/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by R. Forsberg. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/18/1995 | Correspondence letter in support of application, filed by R. Ponder, president of The Idea Factory, Inc. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/17/1995 | Direct prefiled testimony of the following persons filed on behalf of applicant by S. Randazzo: (54 pgs.) 1. Danny G. Engleman 2. Tom Morrow 3. David J. Rayner 4. Thomas P. Staebell 5. Raymong Wendell | 0 |
| 05/17/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by J. Manning and R. Zafarana. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/12/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by K. Westerkamm. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/12/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed on behalf of LCI International by B. Osborne. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/08/1995 | Memorandum contra Time Warner's motion to streamline process for presentation of information, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/08/1995 | Response on motion to establish streamlined process filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/08/1995 | Amended motion to compel Time Warner to respond to discovery filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. (14 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/08/1995 | Letter confirming that Alltel Companies will not be filing any memorandum or other pleading directed to the motion to establish streamline process for presentation of information and for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support, which was filed on May 1, 1995, by the applicants, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by R. Tretvan. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by C. Brush, Piqua Battery, Inc. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by G. Simonson. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Minor. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by L. Baker. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/04/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by D. Bailey. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 05/02/1995 | Additional information filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 05/01/1995 | Motion to establish streamlined process for presentation of information and for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by S. Randazzo. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/28/1995 | Letter in favor of increased competition in the telecommun- ication industry filed by W. Thompson. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/27/1995 | Entry on rehearing of CBT denied, motion for clarification denied, motion to server and consolidate denied. | 5 |
| 04/27/1995 | Entry denying CBT's application for rehearing; denying CBT's motion for clarification filed on March 24, 1995; denying CBT's motion to sever and consolidate filed on March 24, 1995. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/26/1995 | Entry denying Ameritech's application for review filed on 4/11/95. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/24/1995 | Letter filed in response to the motion to intervene by Ridgefield Homes, Inc. filed by D. Clayton. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 04/24/1995 | Correspondence letter filed by K. Westerkramm. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 04/24/1995 | Correspondence letter filed by B. Westerkamm. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 04/24/1995 | Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's motion to compel responses to discovery filed by R. Rosenberry. (36 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/20/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Pilat. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/19/1995 | Reply to memoranda contra its motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/17/1995 | Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/17/1995 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for review filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio L.P. and Time Warner AxS by R. Rosenberry. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/12/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding application, filed by J. Ebling. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 04/11/1995 | Application for review filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (17 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/11/1995 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes by H. Eckhart. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/10/1995 | Memorandum of The City of Columbus contra Cincinnati Bell's motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed by J. Klein, III and G. Dunn. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/10/1995 | Memorandum of Time Warner Communications of Ohio and Time Warner AxS contra Cincinnati Bell's motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed by R. Rosenberry. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/10/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/10/1995 | Memorandum contra motion of Cincinnati Bell to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of MCI Metro Transmission by J. Sanders and M. Franklin. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/07/1995 | Application for Rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by T. Taylor. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/07/1995 | Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's motion to compel Time Warner to respond to discovery filed by D. Hart. (36 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/06/1995 | Reply to Time Warner's memorandum contra (the reply) filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telehone Co. by T. Taylor. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/06/1995 | Entry granting AT&T's motion to intervene; that, to the extent Time Warner's motion to streamline is inconsistent with the Commission's March 9, 1995 Entry or raises issues not addressed by that Entry, it is denied; that Ameritech's motion to compel filed January 23, 1995, is denied with respect to Interrogatory Nos. 1a-f, 7, 7a, 14, 14a, 15, 15a-b, 16, 16a, 17, 17a, 18, 18a, 19, 19a-b, 20, 20a, 21, 23, 23a, 24, 24a, 25, 28, 29, 29a, 31, 32, 32a, 33, 33a, 34, 34a, 35, 35a, 36, 36a, 37, 39, 39a, 40, 41, 41a, 42, 42a, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46a, 47, 47a, 48, 48a, 49, 49a, 50, 51a, 52, 52a-b, 53, 54, 55, 55a-b, 56, 57, 57a, 58, 58a, 59, 59a, 60, 60a, 61, 61a, 62, 63a, 64, 65, 67, 67a-c, and Request for Production Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, and granted with respect to Interrogatory Nos. 2a, 2b, 2f, 3, 3a, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 10a, 11, 11a, 12, 12a, 13, 22, 22a, 26, 26a, 30, 30a, 38, 38a-c, and 63, and Request for Production Nos. 1 and 2; that Time Warner's motion for a protective order filed December 21, 1994, is either denied or granted as discussed in this Entry; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 4/26/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/05/1995 | Memorandum in reply to memorandum of Time Warner Communi- cations and Time Warner AxS contra motion seeking clarifi- cation of Commission's March 9, 1995 entry, filed on behalf of The Alltel Companies by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/03/1995 | Memorandum in support of motion of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of The Alltel Companies by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/03/1995 | Memorandum in support of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of Century Telephone by D. Conway. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 04/03/1995 | Memorandum in support of motion of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone Company to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Assn. by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/29/1995 | Memorandum contra motions seeking clarification of Commis- sions's March 9, 1995 entry, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications and Time Warner AxS by R. Rosenberry. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/28/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Television Association (OCTVA) by S. Howard. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/24/1995 | Motion to consolidate and sever threshold issues, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/24/1995 | Memorandum in support of motion of Cincinnati Bell seeking clarification of Commission's Entry on Procedural Matters, filed on behalf of The Alltel Companies by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/22/1995 | Memorandum in support of motion to clarify of Cincinnati Bell, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/17/1995 | Motion seeking clarification of Commission's entry on procedural matters and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/14/1995 | Supplemental motion in support of AT&T's motion to inter- vene, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T by R. Quinn, Jr. and W. Newcomb, Jr. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/13/1995 | Correspondence requesting that PUCO allow competition by MCI and Warner Cable for local telephone service filed by consumer. | 14 |
| 03/12/1995 | Correspondence letter filed in favor of competition, filed by M. Pilat. | 17 |
| 03/10/1995 | Service notice filed. | 7 |
| 03/09/1995 | Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 5/31/95 at the Commission offices; scheduling a pre-hearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 3/30/95 at the Commission offices; that Time Warner shall file direct expert testimony to be presented in support of application and serve a copy upon all parties by 5/17/95; expert testimony to be presented by any other entity at the hearing will be required to be filed and served upon all parties by 5/24/95. (6 pgs.) Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 03/01/1995 | Letter stating that public hearings should be held before any company is allowed to enter the local service business filed on behalf of The Lanthrop Company by R. Maxwell. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to Time Warners response to comments, filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz. | 5 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to Time Warner's response to written objections, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (36 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to Time Warner's response filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (24 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to response to comments of Time Warner AxS and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P., filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (14 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to response to comments of Time Warner AxS and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P., filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to response to comments of Time Warner AxS and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P., filed on behalf of The Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to the response of Time Warner filed by E. Jacobs. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | The Western Reserve Telephone Company and Alltel Ohio, Inc. reply to the response of Time Warner AxS and Time Warner Communication of Ohio, L.P. filed by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Memorandum of Telephone Service Company in reply to time Warner AXs and Time Warner of Ohio, L.P. response to comments submitted in this proceeding filed by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Chillicothe Telephone Company's reply to Time Warner response to comments filed by A. Korkosz. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Comments of the intervenor city of Columbus, Ohio in support of the application, and alternatively, in support of immediately hearing the application as to the corporate boundaries and service area of the city of columbus filed by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, G. Dunn. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | GTE North Incorporated's Reply in support of objections to application filed by J. Stewart. (14 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/28/1995 | Reply to Time Warners response to comments, filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz. | 5 |
| 02/16/1995 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/16/1995 | Clarification to the pleading filed in this matter on 2/14/95 entitled "Time Warner AxS and Time Warner Com- munications of Ohio, L.P. reponse to comments submitted in this proceeding", filed by D. Clayton. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 02/14/1995 | Response to commments, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (65 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/13/1995 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by C. Wasserman, Alexander's The Great Pizza. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 02/06/1995 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to compel, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/02/1995 | Certificate of service showing service on February 2, 1995, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 02/01/1995 | Updated Certificate of Service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Written statement filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (22 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and request for hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Written objections and request for hearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (22 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and statement of objections to the application and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Kortesz. | 5 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG America, Inc. by B. Weston. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Petition for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of Oxford by S. McHugh. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Objections to the application, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services by B. Royer, M. Franklin, and G. Williams, Jr. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for extension of time for filing written statements or, in the alternative, to permit the filing of supplemental comments, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Request for hearing and objections to application and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (12 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Comments filed on behalf of CompuServe by K. Stuckey. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The City of Columbus by J. Klein, III. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, objections to granting of application, and motion and request for an oral hearing, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Assoc- iation by J. Prohaska. (17 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, objections to granting of application, and motion and request for an oral hearing, filed on behalf of The Columbus Grove Tele- phone Co. by J. Prohaska. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, objections to granting of application, and motion and request for an oral hearing, filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by J. Prohaska. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Objections to the granting of the application, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Objections to the granting of the application, filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Supplemental memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Comments or, in the alternative, motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Arendes, Jr. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/30/1995 | Petition for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Intercommunity Cable Regulatory Commission by J. Baldwin. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/27/1995 | Motion to intervene/request for a hearing/objections and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/27/1995 | Comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/26/1995 | Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Written Statements or, In The Alternative, To Permit the Filing of Supplemental Comments filed by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/26/1995 | Petition of The Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio for Leave to Intervene and Memorandum in Support filed by G. Lampe. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/25/1995 | Affidavit that was included in Ameritech Ohio's motion to compel filed on 1/23/95, filed by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/25/1995 | Correspondence letter in support of the competition in the telephone industry filed on behalf of King Agency by B. Schmakel. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 01/23/1995 | Motion to compel and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (48 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/23/1995 | Proofs of publication filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by D. Clayton. (38 pgs.) (Adams, Allen, Auglaize, Brown, Butler, Champaign, Clermont, Clionton, Darke, Delaware, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hardin, Highland, Logan, Madison, Mahoning, Marion, Medina, Mercer, Piqua, Mont- gomery, Jackson, Preble, Putnam, Portage, Scioto, Shelby, Stark, Summit, Tuscarawas, Union, Van Wert, Warren, Wayne, Miami, Pike Counties) | 0 |
| 01/17/1995 | Reply Memorandum filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (13 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/11/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of FoneNet/Ohio, Inc. by M. Dortch and R. Gavillet. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/11/1995 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of FoneNet/Ohio, Inc by M. Dortch. | 6 |
| 01/10/1995 | Correction to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra the motion for protective order filed on January 9, 1995, filed by J. Kelly. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 01/09/1995 | Memorandum contra motion for protective order filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (17 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/03/1995 | Petition for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 01/03/1995 | Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Television Association by S. Howard. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/21/1994 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schermer and R. Rosen- berry. (40 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/12/1994 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (12 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/06/1994 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cablevision Lightpath-Ohio, Inc. by S. Bloom- field. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/06/1994 | Memorandum contra Time Warner's motion to establish stream- lined process, defer ruling on motions to intervene and for other relief, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/06/1994 | Memorandum in opposition to motion to establish stream- lined process, defer ruling on motions to intervene and for other relief, filed on behalf of the Western Reserve Telephone Co. and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/06/1994 | Motion to intervene and request for hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Western Reserve Telephone Co. and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/05/1994 | Memorandum contra Time Warner's motion to establish stream- lined process, defer ruling on motions to intervene and for other relief, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (19 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/05/1994 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/05/1994 | Memorandum in response to Time Warner's procedural motion filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/02/1994 | Reply memorandum to Time Warner's memorandum contra, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (11 pgs.) | 0 |
| 12/01/1994 | Petition to Intervene filed on behalf of MFS Intelenet of Ohio, Inc. by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/30/1994 | Inital comments in support of application filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by J. Troup. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/28/1994 | Reply memorandum in support of its motion to intervene, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/28/1994 | Entry ordering that applicants cause publication of legal notice by 12/28/94 and present proof of publication to the Commission by 1/30/95; that the applicants file one response to any written objections to the application by 2/14/95; that any replies to the applicants' response be filed by 2/28/95. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/22/1994 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to intervene and request for hearing filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/21/1994 | Letter stating that applicant's memorandum contra GTE North's motion to intervene filed on 11/18/94 was served upon Ameritech Ohio despite the absence of Ameritech's name on the certificate of service, filed by D. Clayton. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 11/18/1994 | Memorandum Contra GTE North, Incorporated's Motion to Inter- vene filed by D. Clayton. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/18/1994 | Motion to establish streamlined process, defer ruling on motions to intervene and for other relief and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant. (42 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/14/1994 | Motion to intervene and request for hearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (16 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/07/1994 | Correspondence letter regarding requests filed on behalf of applicant by D. Clayton. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 11/07/1994 | Motion to intervene filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 11/07/1994 | Motion to intervene, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by J. Stewart. | 3 |
| 11/03/1994 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Representative M. Oxley, M.C. (1 pg.) | 0 |
| 10/26/1994 | In the matter of the application of Time Warner Communi- cations of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS for a certifi- cate of public convenience and necessity to provide dir- ect and resold exchange services, including local exchange and dialtone services. (124 pgs.) | 0 |