DIS - Case Record for 94-1567-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 94-1567-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: GAIL MINNICK/ALLTEL/AMERITECH
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/23/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/16/1997 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 3A, 5th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by K. Hobbs. (2 pgs.)
09/02/1997 Tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 1st sheet 22, 1st sheet 28, 4th sheet 31, original sheet 31.1; Section 2, 6th sheet 15.2, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (6 pgs.)
08/14/1997 Replacement tariff, PUCO No. 2, Check List; Preface, 9th sheet 1; Section 1A, 12th sheet 4; Section 1D, original sheets 1 and 2; Section 3A, 4th sheet 1, 3rd sheet 2, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by K. Hobbs. (8 pgs.)
08/08/1997 Tariff, PUCO No. 2, Check List; Preface, 8th sheet 1; Section 1A, 12th sheet 4; Section 1C, 3rd sheet 1, 2nd sheet 2; Section 1D, original sheets 1 and 2; Section 3A, 4th sheet 1, 3rd sheet 2, 3rd sheet 2A, filed on be- half of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by K. Hobbs. (11 pgs.)
06/24/1997 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)
05/09/1997 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of one-way nonoptional measured-rate EAS and one-way, optional flat-rate EAS from the Elryia exchange to the Cleveland, Olmsted Falls, Trinity, Berea, Strongsville, Victory, North Royalton, Independence, Brecksville, Mon- trose, Bedford, Wickliffe, Hillcrest, Gates Mills, Terrace, and Chagrin Falls and Willoughby exchanges to the extent that EAS does not already exist and the institution of one-way, nonoptional measured-rate EAS and optional one- way, flat-rate EAS from the Elyria exchange to the Amherst, Avon, Avon Lake, Birmingham, Lorain, and Vermilion exchanges to the extent that EAS does not already exist is September 3, 1997, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by K. Hobbs. (1 pg.)
05/08/1997 Entry ordering that the filings by Ms. Minnick, Ms. Hollins- worth, the city, and Ridgefield of April 7 and 8, 1997 are dismissed; that the Commission's March 6, 1997 Entry on Re- hearing is hereby modified, nunc pro tunc, to require Ameri- tech to institute one-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS from the North Royalton, Strongsville, and Victory exchanges to the Elyria exchange and to order that similar EAS from the North Royalton, Strongsville, and Victory exchanges to the North Eaton exchange is appropriate. (5 pgs.)
04/16/1997 Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra second application of Ridgefiele Homes, Inc. for rehearing filed by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)
04/11/1997 Memorandum contra application for rehearing as to the entry on rehearing and application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)
04/08/1997 Application for rehearing as to the entry on rehearing, filed on behalf of complainants by G. Minnick and T. Hollingsworth. (4 pgs.)
04/07/1997 Second application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ridge- field Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (8 pgs.)
03/31/1997 Memorandum opposing the proposed plan of GTE North, filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by S. Serazin. (8 pgs.)
03/21/1997 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Rachel Topeka. (1 pg.)
03/18/1997 Memorandum contra of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. to the proposed plan of GTE North, Inc. filed by H. Eckhart. (10 pgs.)
03/11/1997 Revised proposal of GTE North Incorporated filed by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.) (FILED 3/10/97)
03/06/1997 Proposal filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.)
03/06/1997 Proposal filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.)
03/06/1997 Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by Ameri- tech; that the applications for rehearing filed by Ms. Minnick, the city, and Ridgefield are granted in part and denied inpart as set forth herein; that GTE develop and file by March 10, 1997, a calling option similar to that contained in the stipulation that would provide the North Eaton subscribers with two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the North Eaton exchange, on the one hand, and the Strongsville and North Royalton exchanges, on the other hand; one-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS from the North Eaton exchange, on the one hand, and the Victory, Indepen- dence, Brecksville, Montrose, Bedford, Chagrin Falls, Ter- race, Hillcrest, Gates Mills, Wickcliffe, and Willougby exchanges, on the hand; and one-way, optional, flat-rate EAS from the North Eaton exchange, on the one hand, to the involved Ameritech exchanges, on the other hand; that Ridge- field's inquiry regarding the extent to which GTE's plan must mirror Alltel's plan will be held in abeyance and con- sidered when the Commission reviews GTE's filing; that Ameritech institute one-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS from the North Royalton and Strongsville exchanges to the Elyria exchange; that this case shall remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. (13 pgs.)
03/06/1997 Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by Ameri- tech; that the applications for rehearing filed by Ms. Minnick, the city, and Ridgefield are granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this entry; that GTE develop and file by March 10, 1997, a calling option similar to that contained in the stipulation that would provide the North Eaton subscribers with two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the North Eaton exchange, on the one hand, and the Strongsville and North Royalton exchanges, on the other hand; one-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS from the North Eaton exchange, on the one hand, and the Victory, Indepen- dence, Brecksville, Montrose, Bedford, Chagrin Falls, Ter- race, Hillcrest, Gates Mills, Wickcliffe and Willoughby exchanges, on the hand; and one-way, optional, flat-rate EAS from the north Eaton exchange, on the one hand, to the in- volved Ameritech exchanges, on the other hand; that Ameri- tech institute one-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS from the North Royalton and Strongsville exchanges to the Elyria exchange; that this case be closed of record. (13 pgs.)
02/24/1997 Memorandum in opposition to the application of Ameritech, filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by S. Sera- zin. (3 pgs.)
02/24/1997 Correction to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra application for rehearing of Ridgefield Homes, filed by C. Rawlings. (1 pg.)
02/20/1997 Memorandum contra application for rehearing of Ridgefield Homes, Inc., filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)
02/19/1997 Memorandum in opposition to the application of Ameritech, filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by S. Serazin. (3 pgs.)
02/18/1997 Complainant's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by G. Minnick. (4 pgs.)
02/18/1997 Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra application for rehear- ing of the City of North Ridgeville, Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (6 pgs.)
02/18/1997 Memorandum of The ALLTEL Companies in response to applicat- ions for rehearing filed by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)
02/18/1997 Memorandum contra of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. the application for rehearing of Ameritech Ohio filed by H. Eckhart. (17 pgs.)
02/13/1997 Memorandum contra application for rehearing of complainant Gail Minnick, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (7 pgs.)
02/10/1997 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville, Ohio by S. Serazin. (9 pgs.)
02/10/1997 Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (17 pgs.)
02/07/1997 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainants by G. Minnick. (10 pgs.)
02/06/1997 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (13 pgs.)
01/31/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by J. Collander. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by J. Combs. (2 pgs.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by R. Emerich. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. Grossman. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by A. DeCapilo. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by D. Stewart. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by K. Grove. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by R. Pierce. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Sandhu & Associates, Inc. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Gedeon, Frederick & Co. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by R. Maier. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by D. Hill, City of North Ridgeville. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by S. Grossman. (1 pg.)
01/24/1997 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. Grossman. (1 pg.)
01/09/1997 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mark Lefton. (1 pg.)
01/09/1997 Opinion & Order denying GTE's January 24, 1996 motion to strike Ridgefield Homes' January 9, 1996 filing; that the stipulation filed on October 11, 1996, is approved in its entirety; that Alltel institute one-way, nonoptional measured-rate EAS and one-way, optional flat-rate EAS from the Elyria exchange to the Cleveland, Olmsted Falls, Trin- ity, Berea, Strongsville, Victory, North Royalton, Indepen- dence, Brecksville, Montrose, Bedford, Wickliffe, Hillcrest, Gates Mills, Terrage, Chagrin Falls, and Willoughby ex- changes to the extent that EAS does not already exist and consistent with the tariffs filed with the stipulation in this case; that Alltel institute service one-way, nonoption- al measured-rate EAS and optional one-way, flat-rate EAS from the Elyria exchange to the Amherst, Avon, Avon Lake, Birmingham, Lorain, and Vermilion exchanges to the extent that EAS does not already exist and consistent with the tariffs filed with the stipulation in this case. (36 pgs.)
01/02/1997 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by C. Davis. (2 pgs.)
01/02/1997 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by L. Crandall. (1 pg.)
12/23/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by J. Hanchovick. (1 pg.)
12/23/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by P. Hanchovick. (1 pg.)
12/17/1996 Correspondence letter in support of petition filed by Wilma McVeigh. (1 pg)
12/17/1996 Correspondence letter filed by Robb Lohrer. (1 pg)
12/16/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Smock. (2 pgs)
12/16/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by K. Krueger. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. LeMarco. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Hategan. (1pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Carge. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by C. Opincar. (1pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by C. Miclan. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Miclan. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Miclan. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by K. Kasler. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by E. Kelly. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by S. Opincar. (1pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by S. Kennedy. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by N. Wieczorek. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by R. Kennedy. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Albers. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by C. Krupa. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by B. McCarthy. (1pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by A. Petkash. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by C. Parker. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by R. McClelland. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by M. Tushar. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by M. Rivera. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by V. Toma. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by N. Muntean. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by G. Ittv. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by E. Hunter. (1 pg.)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Antgah. (1 pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by R. Peterson. (1pg)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Fronek. (2pgs)
12/13/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by R. Meyers. (1 pg.)
12/12/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Peak. (1 pg.)
12/09/1996 Correspondence letters from the following persons regarding the petition: (17 pgs.) 1. Pat Dillon 2. William Brink 3. Margaret Krong 4. Barbara Santa 5. Jeffrey Kasler 6. Joyce McAndrews 7. Tracy Stier 8. Judy Nupp 9. Erwin Glisch 10. Susan Savins 11. Charles Beverage 12. Ernie Cavasini 13. Irene Hammond 14. Mary Barett 15. Jim Dolance 16. Gae Snakich 17. Thomas Muicka
12/06/1996 Correspondence letters from the following persons regarding the petition: (8 pgs.) 1. Leonard Barton 2. Leonard Krause 3. Agnes Watko 4. Tool & Equip 5. Joerene Horvette 6. Steve Datko 7. Automotive Equip 8. William Pilot
12/04/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by T. Frigan. (1 pg.)
12/04/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Jennie G. Cooper. (1 pg.)
12/04/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Albert J. Hermanson. (1 pg.)
12/03/1996 Correspondence letters regarding the petition, filed by various consumers. (51 pgs.)
12/02/1996 Correspondence letters regarding the petition filed by the following various consumers: (7 pgs.) 1. James William Grossman 2. Marilyn Grossman 3. Gary Chase 4. Patrick Lee 5. Faye Mosher 6. Esther Lee 7. Timothy Rybicki
11/29/1996 Memorandum in support of stipulation, filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by S. Serazin. (7 pgs.)
11/29/1996 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Jessica Rybicki. (1 pg.)
11/29/1996 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Jessica Rybicki. (1 pg.)
11/29/1996 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Nate Haynes. (1 pg.)
11/29/1996 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Susan Wagner. (1 pg.)
11/27/1996 Complainant's supplemental memorandum to Alltel's Melcs Proposal filed by G. Minnick. (4 pgs.)
11/26/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Johnson. (1 pg)
11/26/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Haynes. (1 pg)
11/26/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by R. Johnson. (1 pg)
11/26/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by H. O'Halloran. (1 pg.)
11/26/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by L. Decapit. (1 pg)
11/25/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by M. Hanich. (1 pg.)
11/25/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by J. Foster. (1 pg.)
11/25/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by S. McKean. (1 pg.)
11/22/1996 Correspondence letter in support filed by D. Moats. (1 pg)
11/21/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Dorothy and Norman Bral. (1 pg.)
11/21/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Lee Armburstel. (1 pg.)
11/21/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Karen Schomport. (1 pg.)
11/20/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Don Kundrod. (1 pg.)
11/20/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by D. Kundrod. (1 pg.)
11/20/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by I. Ridnicke. (1 pg.)
11/20/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by K. Eiermann. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Allen Beckloff. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by J. Colwell. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Judy Colwell. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Jeanne Susak. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Roberta Baumgartner. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Nancy Dobransky. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Anna Bakalar. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by L. Driscoll. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Judith Gedren. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Nancy Bowman. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Charles Bowman. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Cynthia Gecid. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Marilyn Pierson. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Susan Webb. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Emma Hart. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by J. Howlette. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by June Lanning. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Alice McKeon. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Namsook Kim. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by William Miller. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Abie Justice. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mrs. Emerito Velez. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mrs. Mildred Srsen. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Dave Stewart. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by M. Decapita. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mrs. Ann Marie Kudiary. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Fred and Cheyl Younga. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Keith A. and Gloria M. Grove. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Sandra Dodd. (1 pg.)
11/19/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Allen and Winifred Beckloff. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letters regarding the petition, filed by various consumers. (17 pgs.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Carol Arelumarg. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Erika Stuner. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Bob Lawless. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Rick Winrod. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mr. & Mrs Dave Gillock. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Bonnie Lachowski. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Ed Kroszkewicz. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Diane Rose. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mary Bragitikos. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Jennifer Marzano. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mrs. P. Guzed. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by David & Fran Smock. (2 pgs.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mr. and Mrs. Alan Fulkerson. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Paula Zambacciani. (2 pgs.)
11/18/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Gerald Arnould. (1 pg.)
11/18/1996 Response to memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra stipulation, agreement and recommendation, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Companies, by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)
11/18/1996 Response to memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra stipulation, agreement and recommendation, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Companies, by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
11/15/1996 Memorandum in support of stipulation and in reply to memor- andum of Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes Inc. by H. Eckhart. (19 pgs.)
11/14/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Ann Staab. (1 pg.)
11/14/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Mark Lefton. (1 pg.)
11/14/1996 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Jeffrey Roach. (1 pg.)
11/12/1996 Memorandum to stipulation filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (24 pgs.)
11/05/1996 Memorandum contra stipulation agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Raw- lings. (15 pgs.)
10/11/1996 Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick; City of North Ridgeville by S. Serazin; Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart; Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve by T. Lodge. (22 pgs.)
07/25/1996 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Ross B. and Melinda S. Wagner. (2 pgs.)
02/07/1996 Resolution No. 806-96 filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by P. Cope. (3 pgs.)
01/24/1996 Motion to strike or, in the alternative, reply to the supplemental memorandum of Ridgefield Homes, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)
01/16/1996 Response to Alltel's second late-filed reply brief filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (6 pgs.)
01/09/1996 Supplemental memorandum filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (13 pgs.)
12/18/1995 Second late-filed exhibit and objection filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone, by T. Lodge. (22 pgs.)
12/13/1995 Correction to the post hearing statement filed on November 27, 1995, filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone, by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)
12/11/1995 GTE North Incorporated's reply brief filed by J. Stewart. (8 pgs.)
12/11/1995 Reply brief of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. filed by H. Eckhart. (16 pgs.)
12/11/1995 Reply brief on behalf of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (11 pgs.)
12/11/1995 Post hearing reply brief of Gail Minnick filed on behalf of North Ridgeville Alltel subscribers by G. Minnick. (12 pgs.)
11/27/1995 Post hearing brief filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by J. Manning and R. Zafarana. (10 pgs.)
11/27/1995 Post hearing statement filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve, by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)
11/20/1995 Post hearing brief filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (29 pgs.)
11/20/1995 Brief filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (29 pgs.)
11/20/1995 Initial brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (10 pgs.)
11/06/1995 Transcript filed for hearing held 10/23/95, (GP), 194 pgs., Submitted. (Volume II)
11/06/1995 Late-Filed Exhibit submitted on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve, by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
10/30/1995 Correspondence letter in regard to application filed by Andrew. (3 pgs.)
10/20/1995 Letter opposing phone expenses filed on behalf of Realty One by M. Schmittgen. (3 pgs.)
10/17/1995 Direct testimony (revised) of Anthony J. Yankel filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes by H. Eckhart. (48 pgs.)
10/17/1995 Submission of supplemental exhibit, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)
10/17/1995 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by M. Schmittgen. (3 pgs.)
10/13/1995 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Summit County)
10/11/1995 Transcript filed for hearing held 9/28/95, (CG) (GP), 414 pgs. (North Ridgeville, Ohio)
10/10/1995 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Portage County)
09/25/1995 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Ashtabula County)
09/21/1995 Testimony of Jacqueline M. Young filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech, by C. Rawlings. (156 pgs.)
09/21/1995 Direct testimony of Anthony J. Yankel filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. (45 pgs.)
09/21/1995 Direct testimony of Thomas Bier, Ph.D. filed by R. Zafarana. (18 pgs.)
09/21/1995 Testimony of Larry R. Whipkey filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel, by T. Lodge. (16 pgs.)
09/21/1995 Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (44 pgs.)
09/18/1995 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by State Representative E. Kasputis. (2 pgs.)
09/15/1995 Alltel Ohio's submission of corrected exhibit filed by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)
09/14/1995 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)
09/11/1995 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (38 pgs.)
09/11/1995 Notice to take deposition upon oral examination and request for production of documents filed on behalf of complainant, Richfield Homes, by H. Eckhart. (10 pgs.)
09/11/1995 Testimony of Larry R. Whipkey filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)
09/11/1995 Third supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)
08/24/1995 Letter requesting that the hearing be extended to include a second day (September 29, 1995) in order to allow suf- ficient time for the presentation of evidence, filed on behalf of complainant, City of North Ridgeville, Ohio, by J. Manning and R. Zafarana. (1 pg.)
08/21/1995 Legal Notice sent to: Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.), Star- Beacon (Geauga/Ashtabula Co.), The Journal (Lorain Co.), Record Courier (Portage Co.) & the Akron-Beacon Journal (Summit Co.) Certified Mail.
08/18/1995 Letter requesting to have at least two days for a hearing held on September 28, 1995 filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (2 pgs.)
08/18/1995 Entry denying the public hearing to start at 10:00 a.m. on September 28, 1995 and to continue into September 29, 1995 and that GTE's motion for an extension of the cost infor- mation is granted. (AE) (4 pgs.)
08/17/1995 Memorandum contra GTE North motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (4 pgs.)
08/16/1995 Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (2 pgs.)
08/15/1995 Letter requesting that the hearing scheduled for 9/28/95 begin at 10:00 a.m. instead of 10:30 a.m., filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (1 pg.)
08/14/1995 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Joseph Castellana. (1 pg.)
08/08/1995 Answers and objections to Ridgefield Homes, Inc.'s interrogatories and request for production of documents, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (12 pgs.)
07/31/1995 Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:30 a.m. on 9/28/95 at the Education Center in N. Ridgeville, Ohio; that GTE's motion for leave to file its June 9, 1995 information response instanter is granted; that Alltel, GTE, and Ameri- tech file the requested cost information listed in Findings 5, 6, and 7 with the Commission and serve a copy upon the parties by 9/11/95; that any entity requesting intervention shall do so by 9/12/95. (AE) (6 pgs.)
07/03/1995 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by R. Schmitt, Chairman, Bob Schmitt Homes, Inc. (14 pgs.)
06/16/1995 Additional signatures supporting the petition, filed on behalf of complainant. (10 pgs.)
06/13/1995 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by W. Cummins. (1 pg.)
06/09/1995 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (67 pgs.)
06/09/1995 Motion for leave to file information response instanter, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)
06/05/1995 Submission of information response filed on behalf of respondent, Western Reserve, by T. Lodge. (25 pgs.)
06/05/1995 Information response regarding Finding 4 of the Attorney Examiner's entry dated April 10, 1995, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (55 pgs.)
06/05/1995 Information response regarding the Attorney Examiner's entries dated February 10, 1995, April 10, 1995, and April 14, 1995, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (14 pgs.)
05/04/1995 Correspondence letter regarding petition, filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (1 pg.)
04/26/1995 Correspondencne letter regarding the petition, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Mark DeCapite. (1 pg.)
04/25/1995 Supplemental answer of The Western Reserve Telephone Company filed by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
04/25/1995 Answer of GTE North Incorporated filed by J. Stewart. (3pgs)
04/25/1995 Additional Answer of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)
04/14/1995 Entry ordering that GTE and Ameritech file the requested calling information listed in Findings 5 and 6 with the Commission and serve parties on or before June 5, 1995. That Ameritech file the information requested in the April 10th AE entry subject to the changes noted in this entry by June 5th. The settlement conference remains as scheduled on June 15th at the Commission. (AE) (4pgs)
04/10/1995 Entry ordering that GTE, Ameritech, and Western Reserve file their answers to the petition in Case No. 95-63-TP-PEX and serve a copy upon the parties in both of these cases by 4/25/95; that GTE, Ameritech, and Western Reserve file the requested calling information and serve a copy upon the City of North Ridgeville, Judith Pelgar, Terressa Hollings- woth, Ridgefield and the other parties to these cases by 6/5/95/ that Ameritech's extension motion is granted; Ameritech shall now file the specified calling information and serve a copy upon the parties by 6/5/95; that Ridge- field's motion to intervene is granted; scheduling a settle- ment conference at 1:30 p.m. on 6/15/95 at the Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach an amicable reso- tion of these proceedings at the settlement conference, the complainants shall, by 6/22/95, provide to the attorney examiner the name, address, and availability of a suitable location for the hearing. (AE) (8 pgs.)
04/04/1995 Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio in response to motion for leave to intervene filed by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)
04/04/1995 Memorandum of Alltel Ohio, Inc. The Western Reserve Tele- phone Company in response to motion to intervene by Ridge- field Homes, Inc. filed by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
03/23/1995 Additional information filed on behalf of complainant. (8 pgs.)
03/20/1995 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (5 pgs.)
03/07/1995 Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (7 pgs.)
02/24/1995 Response filed on behalf of the City of North Ridgeville by J. Manning. (4 pgs.)
02/10/1995 Entry denying Ameritech's waiver motion; that Ameritech institute the necessary equipment and gather the infor- mation requested in the attorney examiner's entry of November 17, 1994 for the month of March 1995 (rather than for the months of August, September, and October 1994); that Ameritech file the additional information by 4/14/95; that North Ridgeville's motion to consilidate be granted; that North Ridgeville file a list of requested exchanges by 2/24/95. (AE) (8 pgs.)
01/30/1995 Response to motion to consolidate filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)
01/23/1995 Response to motion to consolidate filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve, by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
12/27/1994 Second supplemental response filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone, by T. Lodge. (60 pgs.)
12/14/1994 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (50 pgs.)
12/13/1994 Additional information filed on behalf of complainant. (36 pgs.)
12/05/1994 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)
12/05/1994 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (54 pgs.)
12/05/1994 Motion for waiver of special filing requirement filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.)
12/05/1994 Joint answer and information response filed on behalf of respondents, Alltel Ohio, Inc. and Western Reserve Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (107 pgs.)
11/30/1994 Additional information filed on behalf of complainants by G. Minnick. (5 pgs.)
11/17/1994 Entry ordering that Ms. Minnick's requests to commence the hearing at 10:00 a.m., instead of 10:30 a.m. on 9/28/95 and to continue the hearing into 9/29/95 are denied. GTE's motion for an extension of the cost information is granted in part, and should be filed on or before 9/14/95. Entry ordering that Ms. Minnick's requests to commence hearing at 10:00 a.m. instead of 10:30 a.m. on 9/28/95, and to continue the hearing into 9/29/95 are denied. GTE's motion for an extension of the cost information is granted in part. The cost information should be filed on or before 9/14/95. Entry ordering that Alltel and Ohio Bell shall file the additional information listed in Finding 3 by 12/5/94; that, if Alltel and Ohio Bell are unable to provide the additional information by 12/5/94, they should file the additional information on the date of the prehearing conference, 12/13/94, and bring filed copies with them to the conference for all the parties. (AE) (3 pgs.)
11/03/1994 Entry ordering that Alltel and Ohio Bell shall file their written answers by 12/5/94; that Alltel and Ohio Bell provide the information required by Finding 3 by 12/5/94; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on 12/13/94 at the Commission offices. (AE) (5 pgs.)
10/27/1994 Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by G. Minnick. (4 pgs.)
09/29/1994 In the matter of the petition of Gail Minnick and/or Pauline Hatton and subscribers of the Elyria exchange for flat rate extended area service into all exchanges of Cuyahoga County (served by Ameritech Corp.) (23 pgs.)