DIS - Case Record for 94-1122-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 94-1122-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: AMERITECH OHIO/CHAMPAIGN TELEPHONE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/23/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
05/07/1996 Tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 3rd sheet 27; Section 2, 8th sheet 15.1; Section 5, 1st sheet 6; Part 20, Section 9, 2nd sheet 5, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. McKenzie. (5 pgs.)
02/01/1996 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 8, 1st sheet 3; Preface, 14th sheet 3, filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by A. Moore. (3 pgs.)
08/30/1995 Information response filed on behalf Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)
08/28/1995 Letter stating the in service date for the EAS between the Urbana and Springfield exchanges will be May 14, 1995 filed on behalf of applicant by J. Prohaska. (1 pg.)
06/22/1995 Finding and Order granting application. (4 pgs.)
06/21/1995 Letter in response filed on behalf of applicant by J. Prohaska. (2 pgs.)
05/01/1995 Information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (21 pgs.)
05/01/1995 Information response of the Champaign Telephone Company filed by A. Moore. (5 pgs.)
03/31/1995 Entry granting the IXCs' motion to intervene; that the joint applicants submit additional information in accor- dance with Finding 4 by 5/1/95. (AE) (7 pgs.)
11/15/1994 Letter withdrawing as a party of record to this case, and stating that the law firm of Bell, Royer & Sanders Co. LPA no longer represents Allnet, filed on behalf of Allnet Communication Services by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)
09/26/1994 Proofs of publication filed on behalf of Champaign Tele- phone Company by J. Prohaska. (4 pgs.) (Champaign and Clark Counties)
09/21/1994 Correspondence letter concerning the application, filed by H. Stevens. (1 pg.)
09/07/1994 Memorandum in response and in opposition to comments, statement of opposition, and alternatively, motion for leave to intervene of Allnet Communications Services, AT&T Communications of Ohio, LDDS Communications, LCI International Telecom Corp., and MCI Telecommunications Corp., filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings. (16 pgs.)
08/29/1994 Comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by R. Charleston; LCI International Telecom Corp. by H. Liebman; and Allnet Communication Services, LDDS Communication, and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (7 pgs.)
08/12/1994 Entry ordering that the joint applicants publish legal notice in accordance with Finding 4; that, unless the Commission receives a written statement objecting to the granting of this application for good cause shown by 9/29/94, this matter shall be decided on the basis of the information contained in the application. (AE) (3)
06/30/1994 In the matter of the joint application of Ameritech Ohio and The Champaign Telephone Company for the approval of two-way, non-optional extended area service between the Urbana Exchange of Champaign and the Springfield Exchange of Ameritech Ohio and Local Calling Plus from the Spring- field Exchange of Ameritech Ohio to the Urbana Exchange of Champaign.