DIS - Case Record for 93-2087-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 93-2087-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: WILLIAM & RUTH FOX/UNITED TELEPHONE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/19/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
06/21/1996 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet 1; Section F, 29th sheet 2, 8th sheet 3, original sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by G. Gratz. (5 pgs.)
12/11/1995 Letter stating the two-way measured-rate extended area service (ELC) between Union City Ohio and Greenville will be established August 3, 1996 filed on behalf of applicant by G. Gratz. (1 pg.)
08/03/1995 Supplemental Opinion & Order denying the complainants' request for the establishment of two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Ohio portion of the Union City exchange and the Greenville exchange; that the respondents shall institute two-way, nonoptional, measured- rate EAS between the Ohio portion of the Union City ex- change and the Greenville exchange within 12 months of this Supplemental Opinion & Order; that the respondents establish an in-service date within four months. (10 pgs.)
06/14/1995 Supplemental testimony of Dennis R. McNary filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams and United Telephone Co. of Indiana by W. Walston. (10 pgs.)
06/14/1995 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone,by S. Williams. (2 pgs.)
06/08/1995 Entry dismissing the complainants' application for rehearing on procedural grounds inasmuch as it has not been timely filed. (5 pgs.)
05/19/1995 Memorandum contra the complainants' application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by S. Williams. (5 pgs.)
05/18/1995 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainant by W. Fox. (1 pg.)
04/13/1995 Opinion & Order that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Ohio portion of the Union City exchange and the Arcanum, Ansonia, Bradford, Gettysburg, Hollansburg,New Madison, Rossburg, and Versailles exchanges is denied, and that those portions of this proceeding which pertain to establishing EAS, in any form, between these exchanges are dismissed and closed of record; that the Commission will make no determination at this time regarding the requested EAS between the Ohio portion of the Union City exchange and the Greenville exchange, pending receipt of additional cost and revenue information; respondents shall file by 6/15/95 the requested cost and revenue information regarding two-way EAS, whether flat-rate or measured-rate, between the Ohio portion of the Union City exchange and the Greenville exchange; that complainants file a statement no later than 7/1/95 indicating whether they desire the Commission to hold a further hearing. (18 pgs.)
03/16/1995 Correspondence letter, with attached letter from Tim Gade, filed by Senator John Glenn. (3 pgs.)
03/16/1995 Correspondence letter, with attached letter from Tim Gade, filed by Senator Mike DeWine. (3 pgs.)
03/16/1995 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by M. Gray. (13 pgs.)
03/14/1995 Correspondence letter regarding application, filed by A. Swallow. (1 pg.)
02/09/1995 Correspondence letter to Governor George Voinovich, filed by J. Hardin, WBNN/WTGR. (1 pg.)
02/09/1995 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by J. Boehner, Congress of the United States. (1 pg.)
02/01/1995 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by J. Hardin, WBNN/WTGR. (1 pg.)
01/27/1995 Transcript filed for hearing held 1/10/95, (DF), 167 pgs., Submitted. (Union City, Ohio)
01/06/1995 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by R. Desmond, Design & Data Systems. (4 pgs.)
01/05/1995 Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by R. Desmond, Design & Data Systems. (4 pgs.)
01/03/1995 Testimony of Dennis McNary filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by S. Williams. (18 pgs.)
12/30/1994 Testimony of Dennis McNary filed on behalf of respondent, United Telehone Co., by S. Williams. (18 pgs.)
12/29/1994 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by T. Gade. (1 pg.)
12/14/1994 Copy of correspondence letter to Sam Gerhardstein, PUCO, regarding petition, filed by Senator John Glenn. (1 pg.)
12/13/1994 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Mayor S. Stahl, Village of Union City, Ohio. (2 pgs.)
12/06/1994 Legal Notice sent to: Greenville Daily Advocate (Darke Co.) Certified Mail.
11/21/1994 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by T. Walters, T. Haworth, and R. Graeff, Darke County Board of Commissioners. (1 pg.)
11/16/1994 Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 1/10/95 at the Three Gable Restaurant, Union City, Ohio. (AE) 3 pgs.)
11/03/1994 Correspondence letter, with attached correspondence letter to Senator Howard Metzenbaum from William and Ruth Fox, filed by A. Price. (2 pgs.)
10/27/1994 Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by William & Ruth Fox. (8 pgs.)
09/26/1994 Affidavit of Kimberly G. Douglas filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International, by S. McMahon. (2 pgs.)
09/26/1994 Memorandum in support of motion for partial waiver of filing requirements filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International, by S. McMahon. (3 pgs.)
09/26/1994 Motion for partial waiver of filing requirements filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International, by S. McMahon. (2 pgs.)
09/26/1994 Motion for extension of filing deadline filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International, by S. McMahon. (4 pgs.)
09/23/1994 Joint response to the Attorney Examiner's entry of August 24, 1994, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio and United Telephone Company of Indiana, Inc. by S. Williams. (3 pgs.)
08/24/1994 Entry ordering that the respondents' motion for continuance of the August 24, 1994 settlement conference is granted in part for alimited continuance period; that UTI and UTO shall submit to the Commission and to the spokespersons for the complainants, by 9/23/94, a report which complies with Find- ing 4 and which details the companies' study during the period of the continuance; re-scheduling the settlement con- ference for 10:00 a.m. on 10/3/94 at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.)
08/12/1994 Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co. of Indiana, by S. Williams. (30)
08/12/1994 Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co. of Ohio, by S. Williams. (30)
08/12/1994 Joint motion for a continuance and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio and United Telephone Co. of Indiana by S. Williams. (4)
08/12/1994 Letter certifying that Allnet Communications Services reported the required calling information (if available) to United Telephone on August 3, 1994, filed by J. Nicholls. (1)
07/26/1994 Affidavit filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.
07/21/1994 Affidavit of Patricia Butwin filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup.
07/19/1994 Affidavit of Brenda McKinley filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Long Distance, by B. McKinley.
07/13/1994 Affidavit of Angela E. Webster filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by A. Webster.
06/10/1994 Affidavit informing the Commission that LCI International has filed the required calling information with The United Telephone Co., filed by J. Mushrush.
04/06/1994 Entry ordering that AT&T, MCI, LCI, Sprint, Allnet, and UTLD shall provide information required by Finding 3 to UTI and UTO and file an affidavit with the Commission by 7/22/94; that UTI and UTO should coordinate all the calling information to ensure that all the IXCs are supplying cal- ling data from the same time frame; that UTI and UTO shall file their written answers by 8/12/94; that UTI and UTO provide the information required by Finding 5 by 8/12/94; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on 8/24/94 at the Commission offices. (AE)
12/29/1993 Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by M. Brennan, director of Wayne Industries.
12/28/1993 Correspondence letters supporting the petition for extended area service, filed by J. Buchy and various consumers.
12/28/1993 In the matter of the petition of William and Ruth Fox and subscribers of the 968 exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio for extended area service into the Greenville, Ansonia, Arcanum, Bradford, Gettysburg, Hollansburg, New Madison, Rossburg, & Versailles exchanges of the United Telephone Company of Ohio.