| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 02/20/1996 | Letter advising the Commission that it is no longer pro- hibited from providing interLATA services, filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/18/1994 | Entry ordering that GTE's and Ohio Bell's motion for relief are granted; GTE and Ohio Bell are relieved of the Commis- sion directives contained in its Supplemental Opinion & Order of December 19, 1991, and its Entry of December 17, 1992, and the complaint is dismissed; that, if the restric- tion against GTE's and/or Ohio Bell's provision of inter- LATA services is lifted, GTE and/or Ohio Bell must notify the Commission within 10 days of the lifting of such re- strictions; that this case be closed of record. | 0 |
| 03/14/1994 | Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio in response to motion for relief from a Commission order and motion to dismiss, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 03/02/1994 | Motion for relief from Commission Order and motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 12/21/1993 | Letter stating that the United States District Court Judge Harold Greene, on December 8, 1993, denied the motions of GTE Corporation which sought authority for GTE North to provide interLATA, non-optional measured rate extended area service in this case (copy of which is attached), filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 12/15/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case remains un- changed, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 11/23/1993 | Letter stating that Mr. Kazee's letters of recent date accurately reflect the status of the GTE-Ameritech interLATA waiver requests, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 11/17/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case remains un- changed and they cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 10/25/1993 | Letter stating that the court has not ruled on either party's request for waiver filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 10/18/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case is unchanged, and GTE North cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 09/28/1993 | Letter stating that there has been no change in the status of this case, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 09/07/1993 | Letter stating that there has been no change in the status of this case since the letter addressed to Chairman Glazer by GTE North counsel Bruce Kazee, and is, therefore, equally applicable to Ohio Bell, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 09/03/1993 | Letter stating that the waiver requested from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is still pending, and that respondent, GTE North, cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 07/30/1993 | Letter referencing Mr. Kazee's letter to Chairman Glazer and stating that Mr. Kazee's letter is as applicable to Ohio Bell-Ameritech as it is to GTE North and the status of the waiver request represented therein is the same for Ohio Bell-Ameritech as it is for GTE, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 07/22/1993 | Letter advising the Commission that GTE North cannot yet advise them of teh in-service date for the ordered extended area servcie, filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 07/08/1993 | Letter stating that Mr. Bruce Kazee's reports to the Commission are as applicable to Ohio Bell as they are to GTE, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 05/26/1993 | Letter stating that the letter from counsel from GTE North to the Commission Chairman, dated May 18, 1993, applies as well to the waiver requested by Ameritech, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 05/20/1993 | Letter informing the Commission of the status of this case, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 04/23/1993 | Letter stating that Mr. Kazee's letter of April 16, 1993 addressed to Chairman Glazer in connection with this docket is equally applicable to Ohio Bell's portion of the ordered extended area service, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 04/20/1993 | Letter informing the Commission of the status of this case, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 03/24/1993 | Letter stating that, in accord with the letter directed to Chairman Glazer's attention by attorney Bruce Kazee dated March 15, 1993, Ohio Bell also confirms that no action has been taken on Ameritech's request for waiver, and, therefore, Mr. Kazee's status report should be deemed to apply equally to Ohio Bell, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 02/24/1993 | Letter confirming that there has been no action by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on the waiver requests, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. (FILED 2/23/93) | 0 |
| 02/22/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case remains unchanged, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 01/20/1993 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 01/20/1993 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List - 300th sheet 1; Section 2.3 - 15th sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. | 0 |
| 12/17/1992 | Entry ordering that the movants' motion for extension of the in-service date of December 19, 1992, be granted and that movants shall institute the ordered EAS between Hanoverton and Salem exchanges within 30 days of the granting of the waivers by the District Court; that the movants continue to inform the Commission every 30 days from the date of this order of the status of Case Nos. 82-0192-HHG and 83-1298-HHG until there is a final dis- position of these cases. | 0 |
| 12/16/1992 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List - 298th sheet 1; Section 2.3 - 14th sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. | 0 |
| 12/03/1992 | Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, GTE North by B. Kazee and Ohio Bell by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 10/19/1992 | Letter stating that respondent, GTE North, may not be able to meet the in-service date for two-way measured- rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton exchange and Ohio Bell's Salem exchange, filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 10/15/1992 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 07/08/1992 | Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton Exchange and OBT's Salem Exchange is December 15, 1992, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. | 0 |
| 06/11/1992 | Letter stating that the in-service date for two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE' Hanoverton exchange and Ohio Bell's Salem exchange is December 15, 1992, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. | 0 |
| 05/22/1992 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 04/30/1992 | Entry denying GTE's motion for a 9 month extension of time to implement measured-rate EAS between Hanoverton and Salem exchanges. | 0 |
| 03/16/1992 | Letter regarding Mr. Joe Stewart's letter requesting an extension of the in service date, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 03/13/1992 | Letter requesting that the Commission extend the in-service date for the measured rate EAS to September, 1993, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. | 0 |
| 12/19/1991 | Supplemental Opinion & Order denying request for two-way, flat-rate EAS between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges, but granting two-way measured-rate EAS. | 0 |
| 11/21/1991 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory. | 0 |
| 11/20/1991 | Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. | 0 |
| 11/18/1991 | Correspondence letter filed by Peggy Shultz supporting the application for EAS. | 0 |
| 10/22/1991 | Correspondence letter supporting petition for extended area service, filed by Shultz. | 0 |
| 10/10/1991 | Opinion & Order denying request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between Hanoverton Exchange and each of the Alliance and Minerva exchanges. The Commission will make no determination at this time between Hanoverton and Salem exchanges, pending receipt of additional cost information. | 0 |
| 10/01/1991 | Proof of Publication filed. (Mahoning County) | 0 |
| 10/01/1991 | Proof of Publication filed. (Columbiana County) | 0 |
| 09/13/1991 | Transcript for public hearing held September 10, 1991, (DN) 133 pages, Continued. | 0 |
| 09/09/1991 | Proof of Publication filed. (Stark County) | 0 |
| 09/03/1991 | Testimony of David L. Schiska filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory. | 0 |
| 08/29/1991 | Testimony and attachments of David E. Kasmenn filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. | 0 |
| 08/23/1991 | Proof of Publication filed. (Carroll County) | 0 |
| 07/26/1991 | Legal notices sent to the Free Press Standard (Carroll), The Evening Review (Columbiana), The Youngstown Vindicator (Mahoning), and The Canton Repository (Stark). | 0 |
| 07/25/1991 | Entry scheduling public hearing at 10:00 a.m. at the Kensington First Christian Church, Kensington, Ohio; that the secretary of the Commission cause publication of legal notice; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony comply with Rule 4901-1-29(A)(1)(j), O.A.C. (AE) | 0 |
| 06/27/1991 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory. | 0 |
| 06/27/1991 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory. | 0 |
| 06/27/1991 | Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. | 0 |
| 05/29/1991 | Entry ordering that the respondents shall file their written answers and shall provide the information required by Finding 3 to the Commission and to the spokesperson for the complainaints within 30 days of the date of this entry; that AT&T comply with the directive set forth in Finding 4. (AE) | 0 |
| 05/20/1991 | In the matter of the petition of Clarence A. Rintner and subscribers of the 223 exchange of GTE North to extend toll-free service into the Salem, Minerva, and Alliance exchanges of Ohio Bell Telephone Company. | 0 |