|
11/04/1991
|
Revised price list, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance Inc. by R. Hopkins. |
|
07/30/1991
|
Substitute revised price list filed on behalf of applicant by R. Hopkins. |
|
07/24/1991
|
Revised price list tariff provisions filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc. by R. Hopkins. |
|
10/25/1990
|
Amended Certificate No. 7 issued. |
|
10/19/1990
|
Revised tariffs, PUCO No. l, 2nd page 22.l; and Price List - 3rd page A-l, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Hills. |
|
10/10/1990
|
Revised tariffs, PUCO No. l, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc. by D. Hills. |
|
09/27/1990
|
Finding & Order granting application and approving the agreement. |
|
09/25/1990
|
Revised tariffs, PUCO No. l, 8th page l, 5th page 2, 5th page 3, 2nd page 4, original page 8.2.l, 4th page 20, original page 20.l, original page 23, 8th page A-l (price list), original page A-l.05 (price list), 3rd page A-l.2 (price list), lst page A-l.3 (price list), and original page A-3, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Hills. |
|
09/25/1990
|
Corporate resolutions authorizing the execution of their Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 28, l990, filed on behalf of applicants by D. Hills. |
|
09/25/1990
|
Proofs of publication filed. |
|
09/19/1990
|
Motion for a protective order filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc, by D. Hills. |
|
09/19/1990
|
Entry granting CBLD's request for a protective order and access to the proprietary information be limited to the Commission and its staff. (AE) |
|
08/30/1990
|
Entry ordering that joint applicants cause publication of legal notice by 9/10/90 and present proof of publication to the Commission by 9/25/90; any interested entity who can show good cause why this application should not be granted shall file with the Commission a written state- ment detailing the reasons by 9/25/90, or this case will be decided on the basis on the information contained in the application. (AE) |
|
08/27/1990
|
Entry ordering that CBLD and Unitel file with the Commission the additional information described in Finding (2) by 9/20/90; the joint applicants cause publication of legal notice by 9/20/90 and present proof of publication to the Commission by 10/5/90; any interested entity who can show good cause why this application should not be granted shall file with the Commission a written statement by l0/5/90; unless the Commission receives a written statement objecting to the granting of this application for good cause, this case will be decided on the basis of the information contained in the application. (AE) |
|
08/01/1990
|
In the matter of the joint application of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc. and Unitel, Inc. for the consent and approval of an asset puchase agreement dated June 28, l990 and the transfer of Unitel, Inc.'s authority to Cincinnati Bell Long Distance Inc. |