12/09/1993
|
Entry ordering that all funds for the installation of the active warning devices installed at the Seneca County Road 35, Garfield Avenue, Raber Road, and Logan Street crossings be disbursed to the appropriate parties; that Conrail, CSX Transporation, and N&W Railway maintain the devices at their respective crossings in good operating condition at their own expense; that the Commission's prior orders for the installation of warning devices at the Boyd Corner crossings are hereby rescinded, and the Commission's staff hereby directed to take further action consistent with Finding 4; that this case be closed. |
10/30/1991
|
Report submitted on behalf of the Staff of the PUCO by T. King. |
10/30/1991
|
Findings submitted on behalf of the Staff of the PUCO by L. Charles. |
09/10/1991
|
Entry ordering that Norfolk & Western complete the installation of flashing light signals and crossing gates at the Seneca County, DOT 481 603 Y, County Road 35, crossing by 9/20/91; that Norfolk & Western notify the Commission's railroad section 3 days in advance of the date on which the installation shall be completed in order that the Commission may inspect the devices prior to activation; protective devices shall not be placed into service until the Commission has made such final inspection. (AE) |
08/21/1991
|
Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by W. Dissen. |
07/05/1991
|
Findings filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
05/09/1991
|
Entry granting extension of time and ordering N&W to complete the installation of crossing protection devices by 8/30/91 at Seneca County, DOT 481 603 Y, County Road 35. Consolidated to complete the installation of crossing protection devices by 5/31/91 at the Bales Road grade crossing. |
05/01/1991
|
Findings submitted on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
04/17/1991
|
Motion for extension of time within which to complete installation of flashing light signals and gates in Seneca County, at DOT 481 603Y, County Road 35, and Memorandum in support of motion, filed on behalf of Norfolk & Western Railway Company by W. Dissen. |
03/15/1991
|
Request for permission to late-file site plans, cost estimates, and proposed time schedules filed on behalf of applicant by W. Poynter. |
12/20/1990
|
Entry ordering that Consolidated Rail Corp., CSX Transportation, and Norfolk & Western proceed with the installation of flashing light signals and crossing gates at their respective crossings, with such installations to be completed by June 30, 1991; each railroad notify the Commission's Railroad Section three days in advance of the date on which the in- stallation shall be completed in order that the Commission may inspect the devices prior to their activation. |
11/27/1990
|
Memorandum from R. Patterson, PUCO staff, recommending that the attached revised estimates for the installation of automatic flashing light signals for Boyd's Corner Road, Logan Street, and Garfield Avenue in Findlay, Ohio, from J. D. Cossell, Consolidate Rail Corp., be approved. |
10/15/1990
|
Site plans and cost estimates with cover letter filed on behalf of Consolidated Rail by J. Cossel. |
10/10/1990
|
Site plans and cost estimates for the crossing located on Logan Street (State Route 668) filed on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corp. by J. Cossel. |
10/10/1990
|
Site plans and cost estimates for the crossing located on Township Road 347 A (Boyd Corner Road), Stark County filed on behlaf of Consolidated Rail Corp. by J. Cossel. |
09/28/1990
|
Site plans and cost estimates for crossing CR 246 (Raber Road), Summit County, DOT l42 902W, filed on behalf of CSX Transportation by C. Eicher. |
08/20/1990
|
Response filed on behalf of the Norfolk Southern Corp. by W. Dissen. |
08/02/1990
|
Entry ordering the cost of installation be funded through the supplemental grade crossing protection program and the railroads must file site plans, cost estimates and proposed time schedules for the installation of automatic protective devices by 9/14/90. |
07/09/1990
|
Letter requesting that any time frame set for installation not commence to run until after the cost estimate is approved and installation of the warning devices is authorized, filed on behalf of N&W Railroad by W. Dissen. |
06/05/1990
|
Entry ordering the railroads and/or political subdivisions involved notify the Commission by 7/16/90 as to why the Commission should not proceed with the installation of automatic protective devices as proposed in this entry. |
05/21/1990
|
In the matter of the implementation of the Supplemental Grade Crossing Protection Program. |