|
12/13/1990
|
Entry dismissing case. |
|
05/30/1990
|
Letter stating that CSX has elected not to file a formal answer, but concurs in the placement of gates, provided that the customary allocation of cost responsibility is applied to any signalization found necessary by the hearing examiner, filed on behalf of respondent, CSX Transportation, Inc., by W. Poynter. |
|
05/16/1990
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Consolidated Rail Corporation, by R. Stroh. |
|
05/02/1990
|
Letter requesting extension of time until 5/16/90 to file answer filed on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation by R. Stroh. |
|
05/01/1990
|
Entry extending the time limit for filing the answer of CSX Transportation, Inc. until 5/22/90. (AE) |
|
04/12/1990
|
Various correspondence letters and petitions filed by F. Frecker, Montgomery County Engineer. |
|
04/12/1990
|
Entry ordering that Consolidated Rail Corp. and CSX Transportation, Inc. be joined as respondents; copies of the complaint and Staff's 4/10/90 memo be served upon both; that both file answers in this case within 20 days. |
|
04/10/1990
|
Memorandum recommending that the Commission consider joining Conrail and CSX Transportation as respondents in this case filed on behalf of the PUCO Staff by R. Patterson. |
|
03/29/1990
|
Letter regarding answer filed on behalf of respondent by D. Stuckey. |
|
03/20/1990
|
Entry ordering the Railroad Section of the Commission to initiate an investigation into this matter. |
|
02/16/1990
|
Entry extending time limit for filing an answer to 2/16/90. (AE) |
|
01/31/1990
|
Motion for extension of time to file answer filed on behalf of respondent by D. Stuckey. |
|
01/16/1990
|
Complaint form letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Grand Trunk Western R R/G. Mass. |
|
01/11/1990
|
In the matter of the complaint of Mrs. Riesa Croom (vs) Grand Trunk Western Railroad relative to installation of gates and flashing lights to be installed at the Farmington Road crossing in Miami Township. |