10/31/1989
|
Entry denying the motion filed by OPPA and granting motion to dismiss case filed by Ohio Bell. |
10/16/1989
|
Request of The Ohio Pay Phone Association for oral agrument filed by C. Glazer. |
08/22/1989
|
Reply to complainant's " Response Memorandum and request for leave to file same" filed by Wm. Hunt on behalf of Ohio Pay Phone Association. |
08/07/1989
|
Letter filed by C. Glazer on behalf Ohio Pay Phone, inform- ing the Commission that the company will respond in its Reply in support of its Motion for Protective Order. |
08/07/1989
|
Response memorandum of The Ohio Pay Phone Association and request for leave to file same filed by C. Glazer. |
08/07/1989
|
Memorandum contra motion to compel and reply to memorandum contra motion for protective order filed by Wm. Hunt and C. Rawlings. on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company. |
07/31/1989
|
Reply memorandum of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by Wm. Hunt and C. Rawlings. |
07/28/1989
|
Ohio Pay Phone Association's motion to compel and memorandum contra Ohio Bell's Motion for Protective Order filed by C. Glazer. |
07/20/1989
|
Ohio Pay Phone Association's brief in opposition to Ohio Bell's motion to dismiss filed by C. Glazer, |
07/12/1989
|
Motion for Protective Order filed by Wm. Hunt and C. Rawlings filed on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company. |
07/11/1989
|
Entry ordering that OPPA shall have until July 20, 1989 to file its replies in 88-452-TP-COI and 89-900-TP-CSS. (AE) |
06/29/1989
|
Motion for extension of time to file reply to motion to dismiss filed by C. Glazer on behalf of applicant. |
06/26/1989
|
Motion to dismiss filed by Wm. Hunt and C. Rawlings on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company. |
06/23/1989
|
The Ohio Pay Phone Association's First Set of Interroga- tories and request for production of documents filed by C. Glazer. |
06/12/1989
|
Complaint form letter and copy of complaint mailed out to; Ohio Bell Telephone Company/Office of the Vice President. |
06/08/1989
|
Complaint of Ohio Pay Phone Association (Vs) Ohio Bell Telephone Company, RE: alleging that Ohio Bell's commission structure and "Bonus Commission" plan to be unlawful, un- just and in violation of Sections 4905.30, 4905.31, 4905.32, 4905.33 and 4905.35 of the Revised Code. |