| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/06/1990 | Entry dismissing case. | 0 |
| 04/18/1990 | Transcript filed for hearing held 4/12/90, (DF), 4 pgs., Con't. | 0 |
| 04/13/1990 | Entry ordering that complainant, acting through its trustee in bankruptcy, must file with the Commission and serve upon the respondents, by no later than 6/11/90, a statement explaining whether and how it intends to proceed further in this case. (AE) | 0 |
| 04/11/1990 | Motion of continuance filed on behalf of complainants by K. Hardesty. | 0 |
| 04/09/1990 | Notice of bankruptcy filed on behalf of complainant by K. Hardesty. | 0 |
| 03/21/1990 | Entry denying the motion for summary judgment filed by Acme and Tower on 9/25/89; scheduling hearing for 4/12/90 at l0:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission; ordering that at the hearing, it shall be the complainant's responsibility to appear and to present evidence in support of the allegation that the four respondents are involved in providing unlawful, unauthorized telecommunications service. (AE) | 0 |
| 02/06/1990 | Entry denying the interlocutory appeal filed by Acme and Tower on 9/27/89 and the complainants are put on notice that the Commission will be carefully scrutinizing all further actions of all the parties with a view towards prohibiting any abuse of process. | 0 |
| 01/11/1990 | Entry ordering interlocutory appeal filed by Acme and Tower on 9/27/89 is certified to the Commission. (AE) | 0 |
| 12/15/1989 | Answer filed on behalf of respondents by B. Ferris. | 0 |
| 11/28/1989 | Motion Nunc Pro Tunc to strike any & all pleadings of opposition in the public interest of the Carpenter Subscriber Body filed by James and Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 11/21/1989 | Motion to strike filed on behalf of Acme Telephone and Tower Communications filed by B. Ferris. | 0 |
| 11/13/1989 | Oppisition contra to reply to the motion in opposition to motion for leave to file and summary judgment filed on behalf of the complainant by James and Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 11/08/1989 | Motion to strike filed on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communicaitons, Inc. by B. Ferris. | 0 |
| 11/02/1989 | Motion in opposition to reply memorandum filed by Acme Answering Service, M. Plikers and Tower Communications, Inc., E. Fox by Miriam and James Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/31/1989 | Reply filed on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. filed by B. Ferris. | 0 |
| 10/23/1989 | Motion in oppositin to motion for leave to file and summary judgment filed by Acme Telephone Answering Service, Milt Plikerd; Tower Communicatins, Inc., Ethan Fox filed by James and Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/19/1989 | Reply Memorandum filed by B. Ferris on behalf of ACME Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 10/13/1989 | List of witnesses filed J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/13/1989 | Motion for stay or temporary/restraining order/temporary injunctive relief in the public interest of the Carpenter subscriber body, as Jusge Michael A. Rumer, ESQ, of the commons pleas court of Allen County, Ohio is in conspiracy complicity with David A. Cheney, Esq, attempting the destroy the public interest of PUCO #10 subscriber body filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/12/1989 | Proof of Publication filed. (County/Allen) | 0 |
| 10/10/1989 | Motion for an enlargement of 10 days, to respond to plead- ings of opposition, because of hardship, with oral agrument at 3rd District Court of Appeals, Allen County, being scheduled by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/10/1989 | Motion contra filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/10/1989 | Motion for enlargement of time filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 10/04/1989 | Entry postponing indefinitely the hearing in this case pending dispositions of the 9/27/89 interlocutory appeal on behalf of Acme and Tower, and requiring complainants to submit a revised witness list by 10/l3/89. | 0 |
| 10/02/1989 | Information on expert testimony of Ralph J. DePalma, filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/29/1989 | Motion opposition Contra to ACME/TOWER Motion for relief filed on behalf of complainant by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/29/1989 | Opposition to motion for leave to file of Boyd B. Ferris, Esq., Dated 25th of September, l989 filed on behalf of complainant by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/29/1989 | Concurrance in interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of Duo-Directional Communications, Inc. and Procall, Inc. by W. Schneider. | 0 |
| 09/27/1989 | Entry denying complainaints' 9/7/89 and 9/11/89 application for reconsideration. | 0 |
| 09/27/1989 | Request for certificate of interlocutory appeal filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 09/25/1989 | Motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 09/25/1989 | Motion for leave to file filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 09/25/1989 | Letter filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Tower Communications, Inc., informing the Commission that it may be necessary to request that the hearing set for 10/10/89, be continued | 0 |
| 09/25/1989 | Motion to file instanter filed by and on behalf of James and Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/25/1989 | Additional list of witnesses, filed by and on behalf of J. Carpenter and M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/22/1989 | Entry scheduling hearing to be held on 10:00 a.m., at offices of the Commission; Ordering that the motion for relief filed by counsel for Acme and Tower, on 9/14/89, is denied; Ordering that the attorney examiner's oral ruling made during the prehearing conference in this case, that Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter, inasmuch as they appear together as partners of Carpenter Radio Company, should be permitted to represent themselves at the hearing without counsel, and to participate, without being represented by counsel, in the cross-examination of witnesses, should remain in full force and effect. (AE) | 0 |
| 09/21/1989 | Legal notice sent to the Lima News (Allen). | 0 |
| 09/21/1989 | List of possible witnesses and a summary of their expected testimony filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service. | 0 |
| 09/14/1989 | List of prospective witnesses of respondents Duo-Directional Inc. and Procall, Inc., filed by R. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 09/14/1989 | Memorandum contra to complainants' motion for reconsidera- tion filed by T. Jacobs on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio. | 0 |
| 09/14/1989 | List of witnesess filed by James and Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/14/1989 | Letter filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service, with a list of witnesses. | 0 |
| 09/14/1989 | Motion for relief and memorandum in support filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 09/13/1989 | Amended Certificate of Service filed by and on behalf of M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/11/1989 | Application for reconsideration of the PUCO entry on rehearing dismissing United Telephone Company of Ohio/United Telecommunications, Inc., et al, as dismissal is a violation of Sec. 4905.26, ORC and denies the rights of the 1st amendment 1 of the Constitution when the PUCO states that James M. Carpenter is not able to speak for himself, totally against stare decises and memorandum in support filed by J. Carpenter and M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 09/07/1989 | Application for reconsideration of the Commission Entry dismissing United Telephone Company of Ohio/United Telecommunications, Inc., et al; Failure to adequately comply to Section 4905.26, Revised Code and denial of amend- ment 1 by stating that Miriam G. Carpenter cannot file individual pleadings filed by and on behalf of Miriam Carpenter. | 0 |
| 08/24/1989 | Entry on Rehearing ordered that applications for rehearing filed 7/28/89, by James and Miriam Carpenter, are granted to a limited extent; Ordering that United is dismissed as a respondent; Ordering a prehearing conference as discussed in Finding 11 of this Entry on rehearing shall be scheduled 9/7/89, at 10:00 a.m., in the offices of the Commission. | 0 |
| 08/22/1989 | Opposition Contra John M. Leahy, Esq., Memorandum in Support filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 08/15/1989 | Opposition contra to response to application for re-hearing and request that PUCO assist a bar complainat against John M. Leahy, Esq., Daley, Balyeat and Leahy filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 08/14/1989 | Response to application for rehearing filed by j. Leahy on behalf of respondents Acme Telephone Answering Service and Tower Communications, Inc. | 0 |
| 08/07/1989 | Opposition contra to memorandum of United/Ellen D'Amato, Esq., filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 08/07/1989 | Opposition Contra United/D'Amato, Esq., and memorandum in support filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 08/03/1989 | Memorandum of United Telephone Company in opposition to applications for rehearing of Miriam and James M. Carpenter filed by E. D'Amato. | 0 |
| 07/28/1989 | Application for Rehearing filed by and on behalf of M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 07/28/1989 | Application for Rehearing of Illegal/Unconscionable Order of June 29, 1989, as the Entry is discrimination preference and total violation of 202(a) of The Communications Act, of 1934, filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 06/28/1989 | Entry granting respondent's motions to dismiss this case. | 0 |
| 06/05/1989 | Motion for an expedited hearing in the public interest of Carpenter subscriber body due to new evidence in reqard to Tower Comm., Inc., Acme Answering Service-Grace Communica- tions. Afford-A-Call, Bar Association President George B. Quatman, III, and further application for reconsideration rehearing filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 05/30/1989 | Motion to quash notice of appearance of counsel and joint motion of Tower Communications, Inc. and Acme Answering Service filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 05/30/1989 | Motion to quash appearance of counsel of John M. Leahy and joint motion of Tower Comm., Inc. and ACME Answering Service and further application for reconsideration/rehearing filed by filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 05/22/1989 | Reply memorandum to complainant's motion to quash and motion to dismiss filed by T. Jacob on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio. | 0 |
| 05/22/1989 | Motion to quash to joint motion of Duo-Directional Communica tions Inc. and Procall, Inc. to dismiss complaint and further application for reconsideration and memorandum filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 05/18/1989 | Notice of Appearance of Counsel and Joint Motion of Tower Comm.,Inc. and Acme Answering Service. (filed 5/17/89) | 0 |
| 05/16/1989 | Joint motion of Duo-Directional Communications, Inc. and Procall, Inc. to dismiss complaint filed by D. Cheney. | 0 |
| 05/15/1989 | Motion to quash United Telephone Company of Ohio's memoran- dum contra to complainant's application for rehearing and additional application for reconsideration filed by J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 05/03/1989 | Entry ordering that the complainant's motion filed in this case on 4/13/89, along with their filings in this case made 4/20/89, to the extent they can be considered, either individually or collectively, as an motion for interlocutory appeal to the Commission of the the Attorney Examiner's 4/12/89 Entry, shall not be certified as such to the Commission. (AE) | 0 |
| 05/01/1989 | Memorandum contra to complainant's application for rehearing and additional application for reconsideration filed by T. Jacobs. | 0 |
| 04/26/1989 | Memorandum contra to complainant's motion for reconsideration filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. by T. Jacobs. | 0 |
| 04/20/1989 | Application for reconsideration filed by and on behalf of M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 04/20/1989 | Application for Rehearing filed by and on behalf of J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 04/13/1989 | Motion for reconsideration of Entry of Daniel E. Fullin, PUCO Examiner, Dated April 12, 1989, as same is total discrimination against James M. Carpenter PUCO NO. 10, filed by M. Carpenter and J. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 04/12/1989 | Entry ordering the complainants file by 5/2/89, the statement as detailed in Finding (7); Ordering that Acme Telephone Answering Service, Duo-Directional Communications, Inc., Procall, Inc., Tower Communications, Inc. and The United Telephone Company of Ohio, file by 5/17/89, their responses, if any, to the complainants's statement as detailed in Finding (7). (AE) | 0 |
| 04/06/1989 | Respondent's reply to complainant's motion in opposition contra [sic] to motion to dismiss complaint, filed by T, Jacobs. | 0 |
| 04/03/1989 | Answer filed by E. N. Fox on behalf of Tower Communications | 0 |
| 04/03/1989 | Answer filed by M. Plikerd on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service. | 0 |
| 03/28/1989 | Motion in opposition contra to joint motion of Duo-Direc- tional Communications, Inc. and ProCall, Inc., to dismiss complaint and memorandum filed by J.M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 03/28/1989 | Motion in opposition contra to motion to dismiss complaint and memorandum filed by R. McQuade, Jr. | 0 |
| 03/28/1989 | Motion in opposition contra to motion to dismiss complaint filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 03/28/1989 | Motion contra to joint motion of Duo-Dorectional Communica- tions, Inc. and ProCall, Inc. to dismiss complaint filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 03/28/1989 | Motion to impose sanctions and memorandum filed by M. Carpenter. | 0 |
| 03/21/1989 | Joint Motion of Duo-Directional Communications, Inc. and Procall, Inc. to dismiss complaint, filed by D. Cheney. | 0 |
| 03/14/1989 | Answer filed by Milt Plikerd on behalf of Acme Telephone Answering Service. | 0 |
| 03/14/1989 | Motion to Dismiss filed by T. Jacobs on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio. | 0 |
| 02/22/1989 | Complaint of James and Miriam Carpenter/Carpenter Radio Company (vs) United Telephone Company of Ohio; Tower Communications, Inc.; Acme Telephone Answering Service Duo Directional Communications, Inc. and Procall, Inc. alleging that United is furnishing lines to the other companies in violation of the law. | 0 |