DIS - Case Record for 88-1392-TR-CRA Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 88-1392-TR-CRA
CASE DESCRIPTION: LEWIS & MICHAEL INC. V RELOCA ADV.
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/24/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
01/24/1991 Entry adopting the stipulation and recommendation and closing case.
11/02/1990 Parties stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant, Lewis & Michael, by C. Lewis; complainant, United Moving & Storage by L. Montgomery; and respondent by J. Merrick.
06/06/1990 Entry ordering that the hearing be continued. (AE)
05/23/1990 Motion for continuance of hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by J. Muldoon and M. Brandt.
04/20/1990 HEARING; MAY 25, 1990 AT 10:00 A.M. AT THE PUCO.
04/20/1990 Hearing calendar sent to the applicant, S. Bloomfield and M Brandt.
01/11/1989 Motion for Summary Judgment and for Expedited Ruling and for a Continuance filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of respondents.
01/06/1989 Entry granting motion for leave to amend the answer. (AE)
12/29/1988 Amended Answer of Respondents filed by S. Bloomfield.
12/29/1988 Motion for leave to amend and memorandum in support filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of Relocation Advisors, Inc. of Dayton and Dayton CMR Corp.
12/19/1988 Entry scheduling hearing for January 24, 1989 at 10:00 a.m. at the office of the Commission. (AE)
12/05/1988 Proof of Publication filed
12/05/1988 Respondent's motion for a continuance and for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by S. Bloomfield.
11/22/1988 Legal notice sent to the Dayton Daily News (Montgomery Cty).
10/31/1988 Entry scheduling hearing to be held on 12/14/88, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)
10/20/1988 Answer of Relocation advisors and Dayton CMR Corp., filed by A. Schneble, III.
09/26/1988 Complaint & Complaint letter sent to: Relocation Advisors, Inc. & Dayton CMR Corp.
09/20/1988 Complaint of Lewis & Michael, Inc. and Unted Moving and Storage, Inc. of Dayton (Vs) Relocation Advisors, Inc. of Dayton, Ohio and Dayton CMR Corp., RE: alleging respondents in rendering intrastate transportation service to the United States Air Forcxe to be in violation of Section 4921.07 and 4921.10, Ohio Revised Code.