DIS - Case Record for 86-2095-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

86-2095-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 11/3/1986
Date Closed: 3/14/1991
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/14/1991Entry dismissing case.0
09/09/1987Letter filed by R. Fergus on behalf of PUCO staff to: Shelly Hartley/Mid American Long Distance Company, RE: informing the company of having 30 days from the date of this letter to file information as required or the Commiss- ion through Attorney General's Office will take immediate action to seek injunction against company.0
09/09/1987Letter filed by R. Fergus on behalf of PUCO staff to: Michelle Roner/Telesphere Network, Inc., RE: informing company of having 30 days from the date of this letter to file information as required or the Commission through its Attorney General's Office will take immediate action to seek an injunction against the company.0
09/09/1987Letter filed by R. Fergus on behalf of PUCO staff, to: Dee Johnson/Republic Telcom, RE: informing company of having 30 days from the date of this letter to file informa tion as required or the Commission through its Attorney General's Office will take immediate action to seek an injunction against the company.0
09/09/1987Letter filed by R. Fergus on behalf of PUCO staff, to: JoAnn Wallace/First Phone Corporation, RE: informing company of having 30 days from the date of this letter to file information as required or the Commission through its Attorney General's Office will take immediate action to seek an injunction against the company.0
04/27/1987Letter filed by J.Manz on behalf of North American Telephone Company, Inc., and it's subsidairy Americall L.D.C., Inc., AKA Americall L.D.C., RE: not being subject to the juris- diction of this Commission.0
03/27/1987Motion to Stay Enforcement Proceedings and Request for Permission to file Application for Certification on behalf of Virtual Network, a division of Phoenix Telecommunications Corporation, submitted by R. Taylor.0
02/27/1987Memorandum in Opposition to Jurisdiction of Teledial America Inc., filed by A. Schwartz.0
02/17/1987Response filed by G. Vass, Jr., on behalf of American Network, Inc.0
02/06/1987Comments filed by S. Davis on behalf of Chernow Communica- tions, Inc.0
02/05/1987Memorandum of Mictotel, Inc filed by T. Lodge.0
02/03/1987Memorandum of Dama Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Adams.0
02/03/1987Letter from Transcall America, Inc. stating that they are not operating as a reseller of intrastate long distance service in Ohio filed by J. Yarbrough.0
02/03/1987Letter filed on behalf of Com Systems stating that they are not reselling long distance service and is engaged in the business of transmitting telephonic messages in Ohio filed by G. Gasson.0
02/03/1987Letter informing the Commission that Altermative Communications Co. or Pace Long Distance Service operates as a reseller of intrastate long distance service in the State oF Ohio filed by K. Roland.0
02/02/1987Letter filed by D. Malfara on behalf of Pace Long Distance Service, Relative to respectfully reiterates its belief that it is not a telephone company subject to the jurisdic- tion of the PUCO.0
01/29/1987Letter from J. Mitchell, President of Telecommunication Services Corp stating that the company is not a reseller operating in the state of Ohio. Therefore, they do not fall under the jurisdiction of the PUCO. He also requests confirmation of same from our agency.0
01/27/1987Letter filed by A. Henekener on behalf of the PUCO staff, to Mr. Charles Fedak.0
01/27/1987Letter filed by A. Henkener on behalf of the PUCO staff, to Mr. Ronald J. Bartholomew, S/A American Telecommunica- tions Co.0
01/23/1987Memorandum of Teleconnect Company filed by C. Mahon.0
01/23/1987Letter on behalf of American Sharecom stating reasons why it is not under the jurisdiction of PUCO, filed by M. O'Leary.0
01/20/1987Entry directing the Attorney General's Office to institute legal proceedings against American Telecommunications.0
01/20/1987Memorandum filed by J. Vielehr on behalf of Datanet, inform- ing the Commission that it believes it is not a telecommuni- cations Company subject to the jurisdiction of the PUCO.0
01/20/1987Letter filed by O. Brown on behalf of TSI Telecommunications Systems, Inc., Relative to complying with the Commission's Order of January 6, 1987.0
01/15/1987Letter filed by S. Barkley on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications, Inc., Relative to informing the Commission that it has no facilities capable of completing intrastate communications within the State of Ohio.0
01/06/1987Entry giving each company listed thirty days to file either a memorandum, under the instant docket, explaining why it believes it is not a telephone company subject to the jurisdiction of this Commission, or an application for cert- ification as an interexchange carrier, under a new docket number.0
11/12/1986Entry giving companies listed 30 days to file certain information or this matter shall be turned over to the AG's office.0
11/03/1986Commission Investigation into the Telecommunications operations of various uncertificated companies.0