|
12/05/2017
|
Case Status Form to close cases effective December 5, 2017. |
|
02/23/2012
|
Service Notice |
|
02/23/2012
|
Entry that, in accordance with the above findings, Armstrong's January 27, 2012 motion to compel is granted in part, such that Nova shall have thirty days from the date of this entry to bring itself into compliance. |
|
01/27/2012
|
Motion to compel Nova Telephone Company to port numbers and for an expediting ruling filed by Mark S. Yurick on behalf of Armstrong Communications. |
|
09/21/2011
|
Reply of Armstrong Telecommunications to Response of the Nova Telephone Company to August 11, 2011 Comments of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. electronically filed by Mark Yurick on behalf of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. |
|
08/26/2011
|
Response of The Nova Telephone Company to August 11, 2011 Comments of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. electronically filed by Mr. Stephen M Howard on behalf of The Nova Telephone Company. |
|
08/11/2011
|
Comments of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. incorporating new and additional Authority filed by M. Yurick on behalf of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. |
|
07/14/2011
|
Case Status Form re-opening case with an effective date of 7/14/11. |
|
05/12/2010
|
Memo closing case with an effective date of 05/12/10 electronically filed by Michelle A. Green on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. |
|
04/06/2010
|
Service Notice |
|
04/06/2010
|
Finding and order ordered that the motion to intervene filed by Armstrong is granted; that the application and petition filed by Nova is approved for two years. |
|
02/26/2010
|
Comments of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. in response to the Supplement to application and petition of Nova Telephone Company filed by M. Yurick. |
|
02/12/2010
|
Supplement to application and Petition of The Nova Telephone Company electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive. |
|
01/22/2010
|
Service Notice |
|
01/22/2010
|
Entry ordering that Nova supplement its application by no later than February 12, 2010; that any response to the supplemented application be filed by no later than February 26, 2010; that the motion to intervene filed by Armstrong is granted. (DEF) |
|
12/21/2009
|
Comments of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc., in response to the application and petition of Nova Telephone Company electronically filed by Mark S. Yurick. |
|
12/21/2009
|
Motion for intervention of Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. and memorandum in support electronically filed by Mark S. Yurick. |
|
12/03/2009
|
In the matter of the application and petition of Nova Telephone Company to maintain its rural exemption pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251(f)(1) and Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-7-04 and to suspend or modify the application of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. 251(b) and (c) pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251 (f)(2) and Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-7-05 electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of The Nova Telephone Company. |