| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 04/20/2018 | Case action form closing case(s) effective 04/20/2018 - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Megan Addison, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 2 |
| 12/22/2011 | Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Slip Opinion (June 9, 2011) [Cite as Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) v. Toledo Edison Co., 129 Ohio St.3d 397, 2011-Ohio-2720.] electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 30 |
| 06/15/2009 | Supreme Court Transmittal papers filed. (S.C. 09-880) | 7 |
| 06/15/2009 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 05/14/2009 | Supreme Court Appeal 09-880 filed on behalf of Sunoco, Inc. (R&M). | 25 |
| 04/15/2009 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 04/15/2009 | Entry ordering Sunoco's application for rehearing be denied. | 8 |
| 03/30/2009 | Respondent's memorandum in opposition to complainant's application for rehearing filed by J. Lang on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company. | 9 |
| 03/19/2009 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) by D. Boehm. | 12 |
| 02/19/2009 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 02/19/2009 | Opinion and order that the complaint be dismissed. | 12 |
| 09/24/2008 | Letter agreeing to and extension of time to file the reply briefs in this matter until July 23, filed by D. Boehm on behalf of both parties. | 1 |
| 09/24/2008 | Letter noting that the actual date agreed upon by Mark Hayden for the filing of reply briefs in this matter is July 30, not July 23, filed by D. Boehm. | 1 |
| 08/04/2008 | Reply brief on behalf of Sunoco Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm. | 12 |
| 07/31/2008 | Reply brief of complainant Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm. (FAX) (document filed on 7/30/08) | 12 |
| 07/30/2008 | Reply brief of respondent, The Toledo Edison Company filed by J. Lang. | 11 |
| 07/11/2008 | Initial brief of Sunoco Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm. | 13 |
| 07/10/2008 | Brief of respondent The Toledo Edison Company filed by J. Lang | 16 |
| 07/10/2008 | Initial brief of complainant Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm Esq. (FAX) | 20 |
| 06/27/2008 | Service Notice. | 2 |
| 06/26/2008 | Entry ordering that the parties file their briefs and reply briefs in this proceeding by July 10, 2008, and July 21, 2008. (CMTP) | 4 |
| 06/02/2008 | Joint motion requesting administrative notice and no hearing, memorandum in support filed by D. Boehm on behalf of Sunoco Inc. and M. Hayden on behalf of FirstEnergy. | 7 |
| 05/30/2008 | Joint motion requesting an administrative notice and hearing, memorandum in support filed by D. Boehm on behalf of Sunoco Inc. and M. Hayden on behalf of Toledo Edison Company. (FAX) | 8 |
| 05/20/2008 | Joint stipulation of facts filed by D. Boehm on behalf of complainant, Sunoco Inc. and J. Lang on behalf of respondent, The Toledo Edison Company. | 67 |
| 05/09/2008 | Service notice. | 1 |
| 05/09/2008 | Entry extending the deadline for the filing of stipulations of facts and/or direct expert testimony to May 19, 2008; the telephonic conference be rescheduled for May 21, 2008, at 2:00 p.m.. (CP) | 2 |
| 04/24/2008 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 04/24/2008 | Entry ordering that the deadline for the filing of stipulations of facts and/ or direct expert testimony be extended to May 9, 2008, and the telephonic conference be rescheduled for May 13, 2008. (CMTP) | 2 |
| 04/14/2008 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 04/11/2008 | Entry ordering that the deadline for the filing of stipulations of facts and/or direct expert testimony by extended to April 25, 2008, and that a telephonic conference be held on April 29, 2008 at 10:00a.m. | 2 |
| 03/12/2008 | First set of data requests of Sunoco Inc. (R&M) to Toledo Edison Company filed by D. Boehm. | 6 |
| 02/15/2008 | Entry ordering that the parties adhere to the schedule and processes set forth in findings (4) and (5). (CP) | 3 |
| 02/15/2008 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 02/06/2008 | Request to withdraw application for review and certification of an interlocutory appeal filed on January 15, 2008, filed on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company by M. Hayden. | 1 |
| 02/05/2008 | Request to withdraw application for review and certification of an interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company by M. Hayden. (FAX) | 2 |
| 01/30/2008 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 01/30/2008 | Entry granting complainant's motion for an extension of time in accordance with finding (6). (CP) | 4 |
| 01/22/2008 | Motion of Sunoco, Inc. for extension of time to file memorandum contra filed by D. Boehm. | 3 |
| 01/16/2008 | Application for review and certification of an interlocutory appeal, memorandum in support, filed by M. Hayden on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company. | 17 |
| 01/15/2008 | Application for review and certification of an interlocutory appeal filed by M. Hayden on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company.(FAX) | 17 |
| 01/10/2008 | Entry ordering that a settlement conference be scheduled for January 24, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, 12th Floor, legal conference room, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793. (CP) | 3 |
| 01/10/2008 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 12/24/2007 | Answer of the Toledo Edison Company filed by M. Hayden. | 7 |
| 12/21/2007 | Answer of the Toledo Edison Company filed by M. Hayden. (FAX) | 8 |
| 12/06/2007 | Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Leila Vespoli, Toledo Edison Company. | 1 |
| 12/06/2007 | Complaint response letter and copy of brochure mailed to: David Boehm Attorney for Sunoco Inc. (R&M), complainant. | 1 |
| 12/06/2007 | In the matter of the complaint of Sunoco, Inc. vs. The Toledo Edison Company for the alleged early termination of a contract. | 39 |