DIS - Case Record for 06-1345-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

06-1345-TP-ORD

Case Title: REVIEW CHAPTER 4901:1-6 OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 11/13/2006
Date Closed: 12/29/2008
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/24/2011Case Action Form closing case effective 12/29/08.1
04/01/2009Service Notice8
04/01/2009Entry ordered that NDA's request to withdraw its waiver be granted in accordance with finding (4). 2
03/04/2009Service Notice1
03/04/2009Entry ordering that STi's waiver request is granted in accordance with finding (3).2
02/18/2009Supplement to request for waiver electronically filed by Angela F Collins on behalf of STI Prepaid, LLC.2
02/10/2009Letter identifying that dPi Teleconnect LLC's tariff does not contain any of the type charges and should not be required to filed the detariffing and related action forms filed by K. King. 7
01/30/2009Service Notice.5
01/30/2009Entry ordering that tariffs of those companies listing in the attached appendix be partially suspended and those companies are directed to contact the Commission staff in accordance with finding 4. (JSA)6
09/16/2008Letter of notification of the status of detariffing electronically filed by Angela F Collins on behalf of Dialaround Enterprises Inc.2
09/11/2008Application request for wavier, electronically filed by Angela F Collins on behalf of STi Prepaid, LLC.4
09/11/2008Correspondence regarding the review of chapter 4901:1-6, Ohio Administrative Code; PUCO Case No. 06-1345-TP-ORD, electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of National Directory Assistance LLC.2
07/09/2008Letter on behalf of BT Communications Sales LLC notifying the Commission that it is not operation in the State of Ohio, filed by L. Cicco. 1
06/30/2008Correspondence stating that NextG will not be submitting a detariffing application because it is not a provider of Tier 2 nonresidential or toll services and the company respectfully requests that it be excused from this case filed on behalf of NextG Networks of NY, Inc. by T. S. Thompson.2
06/16/2008Letter stating that AGM Telecom Corporation is an Inmate Operator Service Provider, therefore the requirement to file a detariffing application does not apply filed by M. Wong1
06/16/2008Letter stating that New Edge Network, Inc. will not be submitting a detariffing application filed by P. Bewick.1
06/13/2008Letter of Notification advising OnFiber Carrier Services will not file an application to detariff electronically filed by Mrs. Marjorie O. Herlth on behalf of Qwest Communications Corp.2
06/10/2008Letter stating that detariffing does not apply to FairPoint Carrier Services, Inc. filed by K. King.1
06/04/2008Letter stating that DVC Enterprises, Inc. will not be filing a detariffing application filed by D. Carl.2
06/03/2008Letter of Notification stating United Telephone Co. of Indiana Inc. has no tariffs on file in Ohio and accordingly no requirement to detariff Tier 2 nonresidential services and regulated toll services electronically filed by Mr. Gary S Baki on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Indiana Inc. dba Embarq2
06/02/2008Request for waiver and expedited ruling electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of National Directory Assistance LLC.7
06/02/2008Letter stating that KTNT Communications, Inc. is an AOS provider and does not have to fulfill the detariffing requirement filed by D. Simmons.3
05/28/2008Finding and order stating that Telecom USA's waiver request is granted in accordance with Finding (3).3
05/28/2008Service Notice6
05/27/2008Letter in response to the Commission's May 14, 2008 Entry on behalf of BRCOM Inc. filed by R. Wilhelm Jr.1
05/16/2008Response informing the Commission that Encartele will not be submitting a detariffing application filed by R. Norton.1
05/16/2008Response informing the Commission that Value-Added Communications, Inc. will not be filing a detariffing application filed by R. Norton.1
05/14/2008Service notice.15
05/14/2008Entry ordering that each telephone company set forth in the appendix to this Entry file their detariffing applications with the Commission no later than July 1, 2008.12
05/05/2008Notice of partial withdraw of request for waiver of Rule 5(G)(1), electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.6
03/14/2008Request for waiver of rule 5(G)(1) and an expedited ruling filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.6
01/31/2008Service Notice5
01/31/2008Entry ordering that consistent with Finding (3), each telephone company that has not yet filed their requisite detariffing applications must do so no later than April 2, 2008; that all LECs informally submit FCC Form 477 Ohio-specific data to the Commission staff in accordance with Finding (2). (JSA)2
01/16/2008Service Notice5
01/16/2008Entry ordering that AT&T's waiver request is granted.3
12/17/2007Request for waiver of Rule 5(G)(1) and an expedited ruling filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.9
11/01/2007Service notice.62
10/31/2007Entry ordering OCC's application for rehearing is granted; that all telephone companies seeking the detariffing of Tier 2 nonresidential services and regulated toll services must provide customer notice and that the Commission staff include a section on the Commission's web-site informing residential customers regarding the ramifications of the detariffing of long distance service.7
10/29/2007Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to application for rehearing by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by T. Lodge.5
10/29/2007AT&T's memorandum contra to the application for rehearing of the OCC, filed by M. Fenlon.5
10/19/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by J. Migden-Ostrander on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.8
09/26/2007Service Notice62
09/26/2007Entry ordering that all telephone companies utilize the attached affidavit consistent with this entry nunc pro tunc.3
09/19/2007Entry ordering that all telephone companies utilize the telecommunications application form and the ACE supplemental application form in accordance with Finding (2); that all telephone companies currently providing tariffed Tier 2 nonresidential services and all telephone companies providing regulated toll services shall file the applicable detariffing ATA in accordance with Findings (3) and (4); that all telephone companies seeking the detariffing of Tier 2 nonresidential services and regulated to all services must provide customer notice in accordance with Finding (3); that in conjunction with the provision of customer notice, all telephone companies must file the requisite affidavit in accordance with Findings (3) and (5). 13
09/19/2007Service Notice62
08/01/2007Service Notice5
08/01/2007Entry granting in part and denying in part the applications for rehearing; that Rules 4901:1-6-01, 4901:1-6-05, 4901:1-6-06, 4901:1-6-14, and 4901:1-6-16 are amended in accordance with the findings in this entry.32
07/16/2007Memorandum contra filed on behalf of AT&T, by J. Kelly.5
07/16/2007Memorandum contra the application for rehearing filed on behalf of OCC, by T. Etter.11
07/16/2007Memorandum filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC in opposition to applications for rehearing of the OCC and the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association, by D. Hart.6
07/16/2007Memorandum on behalf of Verizon in opposition to the OCC application for rehearing by T. Lodge.6
07/06/2007Verizon's application for rehearing filed by T. Lodge.9
07/06/2007Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by D. Bergmann.20
07/06/2007Application for rehearing filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon.8
07/06/2007Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.6
07/06/2007Application for rehearing of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association and memorandum in support filed by S. Howard.9
06/07/2007Service Notice51
06/06/2007Opinion ordering that Rule 4901:1-6-13, O.A.C., be filed as a no change rule, that Rules 4901:1-6-02 and 4901:1-6-14, O.A.C., be amended as indicated in the appendix, and that the remaining rules in Chapter 4901:1-6, O.A.C., be rescinded and new rules be enacted as set forth in the appendix to this Opinion and Order; that all telephone companies file the appropriate detariffing application, to the extent applicable, consistent with the terms of this order; that to the extent not addressed in this order or attached appendix, all other arguments are denied.108
03/30/2007Notice of appearance of counsel of William A. Adams on behalf of Windstream Ohio and Windstream Western Reserve.8
02/23/2007Reply comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LLC, filed by T. O'Brien.6
02/23/2007Reply comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, filed by D. Hart.12
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of the OCC filed by D. Bergmann.26
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of AT&T filed by M. Fenlon.23
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.8
02/23/2007Reply comments filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC dba Verizon Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions (collectively "Verizon") filed by T. Lodge.6
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq and Embarq Communications, Inc. filed by J. Stewart.8
02/05/2007Service Notice4
02/05/2007Entry granting extensions of time in accordance with finding 2. (JJ)1
01/18/2007Service Notice5
01/18/2007Entry granting motions for extension of time in accordance with Finding (3). (JA)2
01/18/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Rodgers on behalf of XO Communications, Services, Inc.2
01/16/2007Motion for extension of time to file reply comments and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge in behalf of the Ohio Telecom Associations. 4
01/11/2007Supplemental certificate of service filed by R. Wilhelm, Jr. on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC.2
01/10/2007Certificate of service of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LLC filed by T. O'Brien.2
01/09/2007Supplemental certificate of service filed by D. Turano on behalf of Qwest Communications Corporation.2
01/09/2007Certificate of service filed by J. Stewart on behalf of Embarq.1
01/08/2007Certificate of service filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.2
01/08/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.3
01/08/2007Supplemental certificate of service filed by S. Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.2
01/08/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Service, LLC dba Verizon Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions (collectively "Verizon").3
01/05/2007Initial comments of the Ohio Telecom Association, filed by C. Flahive and T. Lodge.14
01/05/2007Initial comments filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC dba Verizon Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions (collectively "Verizon"), by C. Flahive.14
01/05/2007Comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LLC filed by T. O'Brien.6
01/05/2007Initial comments of the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC, filed by R. Wilhelm.13
01/05/2007Initial comments filed on behalf of the AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon.13
01/05/2007Comments of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by D. Bergmann.66
01/05/2007Initial comment of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard.7
01/05/2007Initial comments of Qwest Communications Corporation, filed by D. Turano.2
01/05/2007Initial comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq and Embarq Communications, Inc., filed by J. Stewart.42
01/04/2007Initial comments of XO Communications Services, Inc. filed by T. Rodgers.2
11/21/2006Entry ordering that interested persons and entities are authorized to file initial and/or reply comments in accordance with finding (5); that an informational conference be held at 1:00 p.m. on November 30, 2006 at the offices of the Commission, 180 E. Broad St., Hearing room 11-E, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793.34
11/21/2006Service Notice53
11/13/2006In the matter of the Review of Chapter 4901:1-6, Ohio Administrative Code.1