| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 08/09/2007 | Memo automatically closing case with an effective date of 8/8/07. | 1 |
| 05/31/2007 | Final executed interconnection agreement submitted on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. LP/ The Chillicothe Telephone Co. which contains the conforming language and is signed by both parties filed by S. Howard. | 16 |
| 05/09/2007 | Entry approving the conforming language interconnection agreement, as submitted by Sprint on April 23, 2007. | 3 |
| 05/09/2007 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 04/23/2007 | Notice of filing of final interconnection agreement language filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by S. Howard. | 16 |
| 04/12/2007 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 04/11/2007 | Opinion and order stating that the interconnection agreement language between Sprint and Chillicothe, which was adopted by the Commission on February 28, 2007, shall include the additional terms and conditions set forth in this order; that no changes in the proposed agreement shall occur without Commission approval. | 10 |
| 04/02/2007 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, LLP by S. Howard. | 5 |
| 04/02/2007 | Reply comments on proposed interconnection agreement language filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Company by D. Conway. | 7 |
| 03/26/2007 | Comments of Chillicothe Telephone Company on proposed interconnection agreement language filed by D. Conway. | 8 |
| 03/26/2007 | Comments of Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed by S. Howard. | 10 |
| 03/14/2007 | Revised interconnection agreement language filed by D. Conaway on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company. | 33 |
| 03/14/2007 | Revised interconnection agreement language filed by S. Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company. | 16 |
| 02/28/2007 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 02/28/2007 | Arbitration Award; ordered that Sprint and Chillicothe incorporate the directives set forth in this Arbitration Award within their final interconnection agreement; that, within 14 days of the Arbitration Award, Sprint and Chillicothe shall docket their entire interconnection agreement for review by the Commission, in accordance with Mediation/Arbitration Guidelines X.J., that if the parties are unable to agree upon an entire interconnection agreement within this time frame, each party shall file for Commission review its version of the language that should be used in a Commission approved interconnection agreement; that, within ten days of the filing of the interconnection agreement amendment, any party or other interested persons may file written comments supporting or opposing the proposed interconnection agreement amendment and that any party or other interested persons may file responses to comments within five days thereafter, that, this docket shall remain open until further order of the Commission. | 24 |
| 02/05/2007 | Post-Hearing reply brief of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. filed by S. Howard. | 22 |
| 02/05/2007 | Post-Hearing reply brief on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Company filed by D. Conway. | 15 |
| 01/25/2007 | Transcript and exhibits of hearing held January 10, 2007 continued. (Part 2 of 2) | 150 |
| 01/25/2007 | Transcript and exhibits of hearing held January 10, 2007, Columbus, Ohio; attorney examiner Douglas Jennings. (Part 1 of 2) | 141 |
| 01/25/2007 | Initial post hearing brief of The Chillicothe Telephone Company filed by D. Conway. | 33 |
| 01/25/2007 | Post hearing initial brief of Sprint Communications Company, L.P., filed by S. Howard. | 24 |
| 01/09/2007 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 01/09/2007 | Entry ordering that Gerald J. Duffy be permitted to appear as counsel and represent the Chillicothe Telephone Company in this proceeding. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 12/19/2006 | Motion pro hac vice filed by D. Conway on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. | 2 |
| 12/19/2006 | Direct testimony of Bill Mckell on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Company filed by D. Conway. | 17 |
| 12/19/2006 | Arbitration package, testimony of Randy G. Farrar, testimony of James R. Burt, and exhibits, joint issues matrix, and certificate of service on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by S. Howard. | 210 |
| 11/17/2006 | Entry ordered; that parties comply with the schedule as set forth in Finding (1), that the arbitration hearing is scheduled in accordance with Finding (2); that the motion pro hac vice is granted in accordance with Finding (4). (JSA) | 2 |
| 11/17/2006 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 11/16/2006 | Letter confirming that neither Sprint Communications Company L.P. nor the Chillicothe Telephone Company object to the Commission taking until March 8, 2007 to issue an arbitration award filed by S. Howard, D. Conway. | 1 |
| 11/07/2006 | The Chillicothe Telephone Company's response to Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s petition for arbitration by D. Conway. | 20 |
| 11/07/2006 | Response to Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s petition for arbitration, filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by D. Conway and G. Duffy. | 20 |
| 11/03/2006 | Entry ordered; that Jennifer A. Duane shall be permitted to appear as counsel and represent Sprint in this proceeding.( LDJ) | 2 |
| 10/30/2006 | Motion pro hac vice for Jeffrey M. Pfaff to be admitted to practice before the PUCO for purposes of the noted case, filed on behalf of Sprint/Nextel Corporation by S. Howard. | 2 |
| 10/13/2006 | Motion pro hac vice to allow Jennifer A. Duane, Sprint Communications Company, L.P. to practice before the Commission, filed by S. Howard. | 2 |
| 10/13/2006 | In the matter of the application of Sprint Communications Company LP petition for arbitration to establish an interconnection agreement with Chillicothe Telephone Company. | 66 |