DIS - Case Record for 05-1305-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

05-1305-TP-ORD

File a Public Comment
Case Title: IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION OF INCUMBENT TELEPHONE COMPANIES
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 10/25/2005
Date Closed: 9/25/2012
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/25/2012Case Action Form electronically filed by Michelle A Green on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
04/30/2007Supreme Court transmittal papers. 13
03/30/2007Notice of appearance of counsel of William A. Adams on behalf of Windstream Ohio and Windstream Western Reserve.8
05/03/2006Entry on rehearing that the applications for rehearing are granted in part and denied in part as outlined in this entry on rehearing.50
05/03/2006Service Notice6
05/02/2006Proof of publication (Morrow County)1
04/17/2006Memorandum Contra the Consumer Groups' application for rehearing filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.29
04/17/2006Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in response to application for rehearing filed by T. Lodge.8
04/17/2006Memorandum of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC in opposition to Consumer Groups' application for rehearing filed by D. Hart on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC.15
04/17/2006Memorandum contra applications for rehearing of AT&T Ohio, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, Verizon North Inc. and The Ohio Telecom Association by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The City of Cleveland, The Cities of Toledo, Holland, Maumee, Northwood, Oregon, Perrysburg, and Sylvania and Lucas County, Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, Communities United for Action, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition filed by D. Bergmann, H. Madorsky, K. Bruce, S. McAdams, B. Ballenger, P. Goldberg, P. Gwyn, P. Skaff, J. Moan, L. Keiffer, M. Smalz, E. Jacobs, N. Morgan and J. Meissner25
04/17/2006Memorandum contra of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by S. Howard.5
04/06/2006Application for rehearing filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.23
04/06/2006Application for rehearing on behalf of Verizon Inc. filed by T. Lodge.13
04/06/2006Application for rehearing and clarification on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.15
04/06/2006Application for rehearing on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC filed by P. Rupich.14
04/06/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by D. Bergman on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel; H. Madorsky on behalf of the City of Cleveland; K. Bruce for the City of Toledo; P. Skaff for the City of Holland; S. McAdams for the City of Maumee; B. Ballenger for the City of Northwood; P. Goldberg for the City of Oregon; P. Gwinn for the City of Perrysburg; J. Moan for the City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer for Lucas County; M. Smalz for Appalachian People's Action Coalition; N. Morgan for Communities United For Action; E. Jacobs for Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; J. Meissner for Consumers For Fair Utility Rates and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition.71
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Shelby County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Hamilton County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Preble County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Noble County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Auglaize County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Licking County)2
03/21/2006Proof of publication (Ottawa County)2
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Trumbull County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Portage County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Fairfield County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Marion County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Ross County)2
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Scioto County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Meigs County)1
03/21/2006Proof of publication. (Columbiana County)1
03/10/2006Correspondence stating key points of the testimony of Gary D. Little at the public hearing held in Athens, Ohio on January 24, 2006 filed by G. Little and a letter supporting updated telecom policies filed by J. Seiber, Advocate for Seniors in the Mahoning Valley.4
03/08/2006Service Notice10
03/07/2006Opinion and Order stating that existing Chapter 4901:1-4 be rescinded with such recession becoming effective simultaneously with the effectiveness of the new rules being adopted today as set forth in appendix C to this opinion and order; that the new Chapter 4901:1-4 as set forth in appendix C to this opinion and order be adopted; that applications for BLES alternative regulation be consistent with appendix A and B to this opinion and order; that the following the statutory rehearing period, copies of Chapter 4901:1-4 O.A.C as set forth in appendix C to this opinion and order, be filed with the Joint Committee on agency Rule Review, the Legislative Service Commission and Secretary of State in accordance with divisions (D) and (E) of section 111.15, revised code; that to the extent not addressed in the opinion and order or the attached appendices, all other arguments raised are denied.71
03/06/2006Comments filed by J. Mickler Sr.on behalf of Greater Toledo Urban League, Inc.2
03/01/2006Service Notice26
03/01/2006Letters and copies of hearing testimony supporting the update of the rules and regulations for basic phone service filed by E. Rawls and L. Jackson, consumers.4
02/28/2006Letter stating that ITAAO does not want to see rules that would prevent fair pricing structures to major supplies of communication in their region, while other competitors are only limited by market forces filed by G. Little.2
02/27/2006Correspondence letters supporting HB 218/SB 134 filed by various consumers.9
02/24/2006Letters in favor of Alternative Regulation proposal currently under consideration at the PUCO, filed by various consumers.7
02/24/2006Letters from various consumers in support of HB 218.21
02/23/2006Corrected comments on local public hearings filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by D. Bergmann.8
02/22/2006Transcript for hearing held January 23, 2006 before J. Jones, Hearing Officer.133
02/22/2006Transcript for hearing held January 24, 2006 in the matter of the implementation of H.B. 218.53
02/17/2006Correspondence letters from various consumers opposing the rate increase.63
02/14/2006Transcript for proceedings held Thursday, January 26, 2006 at Dayton Municipal Building City Council Chambers, Dayton, Ohio, before Chairman Alan R. Schriber.51
02/10/2006Correspondence letters from various consumers opposing the rate increase.181
02/09/2006Proof of Publication: counties of Huron, Muskingum, Warren, Franklin, Van Wert, Greene, Adams, Hancock, Jackson, Stark, Cuyahoga, Richland, Hamilton, Clermont, Hardin, Sandusky, Geauga, Montgomery, Clark, Butler, Clinton, Preble, Miami, Darke, Mercer, Shelby, Fayette, Logan, Auglaize, Champaign, Perry, Seneca, Summit, Paulding, Lorain, Gallia, Defiance, Highland, Vinton, Belmont, Medina, Delaware, Mahoning, Lucas, Knox, Holmes, Henry, Brown, Ashland, Wayne, Tuscarawas, PIckaway, Wood, Erie, Wyandot, Monroe, Williams, Crawford, and Coshocton, Athens, Madison, Lake.72
02/03/2006Transcript for proceedings held Friday, January 20, 2006 at Cincinnati City Hall, Cincinnati, Ohio, before Commissioner Alan R. Schriber.63
02/03/2006Correspondence letters from various consumers opposing the rate increase.29
02/01/2006Correspondence letters from various consumers opposing the rate increase for local telephone companies.10
02/01/2006Transcript w/exhibits of hearing held before Commissioner Ronda Fergus at the PUCO on January 18, 2006.44
02/01/2006Comments on Local Public Hearings by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann8
01/31/2006Comments on proposed rules for flexible pricing of basic local telephone service, filed by W. Sims.8
01/27/2006Transcript w/exhibit of public hearing held before Commissioner Donald L. Mason, at Mansfield City Hall, on January 13, 2006.74
01/27/2006Correspondence letters from various consumers opposing the rate increase by various telephone companies, and response letters to consumers from PUCO staff.76
01/20/2006Letters from various consumers opposing the telephone rate increase for basic local services.14
01/19/2006Transcript of hearing before Commissioner Rogers held January 11, 2006.164
01/13/2006Letter opposing to the increase in basic rates for telephone service, filed by Mary and Frank Germano, consumers.1
01/09/2006Proof of publications for Guernsey, Jefferson, Allen, Athens, Hocking, Logan, Fulton, Washington, Ashtabula, Mercer and Putnam Counties.12
01/05/2006Legal notices faxed to all 88 counties in the State of Ohio.180
01/03/2006Proof of Publication. (Carroll County)2
01/03/2006Letter to Commission staff stating that he is looking forward to staff revising the rules appropriately and to working in the successful implementation of HB 218, filed by R. Schuler, State Senator.-7th Ohio Senate District.3
12/23/2005Entry ordering a correction on the previously filed legal notice. (PD)3
12/23/2005Reply comments filed by P. Rupich on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC.19
12/22/2005Reply comments of the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, City of Cleveland, Cities of Toledo, Holland, Maumee, Northwood, Oregon, Perrysburg, and Sylvania and Lucas County, Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, Communities United for Action, Edgemont neighborhood Coalition, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition filed by D. Bergmann.155
12/22/2005Reply comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by S. Howard.6
12/22/2005Reply comments filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. filed by T. Lodge.10
12/22/2005Reply comments of AARP of Ohio filed by R. Bridges47
12/22/2005Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.24
12/22/2005Reply comments of SBC Ohio filed by J. Kelly.47
12/22/2005Reply comments of the United State Department of Defense and All Other Federal Executive Agencies filed by T. Spann.43
12/21/2005Entry granting motion for public hearing to Consumer Groups in accordance with finding (4); that the customer notice of the public hearings be published in accordance with finding (5).4
12/21/2005Service notice.3
12/19/2005Reply memorandum of Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to motion for local public hearings by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter, The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition by M.Smalz, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition by J.Meissner.7
12/12/2005Letter submitted to correct page 8 filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.2
12/12/2005Memorandum in opposition to motion for local public hearings filed by T. Lodge on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Association.7
12/07/2005Certificate of service filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of OCC.2
12/06/2005Initial comments of SBC Ohio J. Kelly.41
12/06/2005Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.67
12/06/2005Comments filed on behalf of AARP by D. Brevitz and R. Bridges of Government Affairs.47
12/06/2005Comments of The United States Department of Defense and all other Federal Executive Agencies filed by T. Spann.39
12/06/2005Comments filed by D. Bergmann, OCC; M. Zigli, City of Cleveland; K. Bruce, City of Toledo; S. McAdams, City o Maumee; B. Ballenger, City of Northwood; P. Goldberg, City of Oregon; P. Gwyn, City of Perrysburg; P. Skaff, Village of Holland; J. Moan, City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer, Lucas County, M. Smalz, Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Ohio State Legal Services Association; E. Jacobs, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; N. Morgan, Communities United for Action, Legal Aid Society of Greater Cleveland; and J. Meissner, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition and Legal Aid Society of Cleveland.182
12/06/2005Initial comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC filed by D. Hart.21
12/06/2005Initial comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by S. Howard.6
12/06/2005Comments of Verizon North, Inc. filed by T. Lodge.18
11/30/2005Entry ordering that an extension of the filing time frames for initial and reply comments is granted in accordance with finding (3). (JJ)2
11/30/2005Service Notice20
11/30/2005Service Notice20
11/30/2005Entry ordered that the November 30, 2005, entry is modified nunc pro tune in accordance with granting the extensions of time, for both the initial and the reply comment time frames. However, the November 30, 2005, entry failed to note the newly revised deadline for filing reply comments. The reply comments are now due on December 22, 2005, in all other respects, the November 30, 2005, entry shall remain in full force and effect.(JJ)2
11/29/2005Motion to extend deadline for filing of initial and reply comments and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard.3
11/28/2005Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.5
11/28/2005Motion for local public hearings and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Office of Consumers Counsel by T. Etter; Advocates for Basic Legal Equality, Inc. by E. Jacobs; Ohio State Legal Services Association by M. Smalz and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition by J. Meissner.8
11/04/2005Service Notice20
11/04/2005Entry ordering that interested persons and entities are hereby authorized to file initial and/or reply comments in accordance with finding (3) ; that a conference is held at the offices of the Commission, in Hearing Room 11-E, on November 9, 2005 immediately following the Commission meeting (approximately 2:00 p.m.).12
10/25/2005In the matter of the implementation of H.B. 218 concerning alternative regulation of basic local exchange service of incumbent local exchange telephone companies.1