DIS - Case Record for 05-1102-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

05-1102-TP-ORD

File a Public Comment
Case Title: REVIEW OF THE COMMISSION'S MINIMUM TELEPHONE SERVICE STANDARDS FOUND IN CHAPTER 4901:1-5
Status: OPEN-OPEN
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 9/6/2005
Date Closed: 1/19/2011
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/19/2011Memo closing case with an effective date of 01/19/11.1
12/19/2008Service notice. 11
12/18/2008Service Notice11
12/17/2008Entry on rehearing stating that the Consumer Groups' application for rehearing is denied as discussed in this entry.7
12/15/2008Memorandum contra Consumer Groups' application for rehearing electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
12/15/2008Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing by the Office of the Consumers' Counsel, et al. electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.9
12/15/2008Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to application for rehearing of the Consumer Groups electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.5
12/05/2008Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel23
11/13/2008Service Notice.70
11/12/2008Entry nunc pro tunc ordering that the appendix to the November 5, 2008, finding and order be revised as set forth in finding 2.2
11/06/2008Service Notice11
11/05/2008Finding and order stating that Rule 10 be revised as set forth in the appendix to this finding and order; that attached revised Rule 4901:1-5-10. O.A.C., should be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, the Secretary of State, and the Legislative Service Commission in accordance with divisions (D) and (E) of Section 111.15, Revised Code; the final rule be effective on the earliest date permitted by law; AT&T's May 28, 2008, waiver request in moot and that all telecommunications service providers in Ohio review and amend their tariffs, if applicable, in accordance with this finding and order.14
09/05/2008Reply Comments of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, The City of Cleveland, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers For Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.14
09/05/2008Reply Comments electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.9
09/05/2008Reply Comments electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.5
09/05/2008Reply Comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association, electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.8
09/05/2008Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association, electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.7
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.3
08/25/2008Certificate of Service electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.2
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association3
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.3
08/25/2008Certificate of service filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. electronically filed by Mrs. Vickie Norris on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.2
08/22/2008Initial Comments filed in response to Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry by Daniel R. Conway, Attorney, on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. electronically filed by Mrs. Vickie Norris on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.4
08/22/2008Comments of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, the Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, the City of Cleveland, Communities United for Action, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and David C. Bergmann and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel25
08/22/2008Comments of Verizon North Inc. in response to the Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.4
08/22/2008Initial comments of AT&T Ohio's electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.5
08/22/2008Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC in Response to the Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.5
08/22/2008Comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq in response to the Commission's July, 31 2008 Entry electronically filed by Sonya I Summers on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq.6
08/22/2008Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association in Response to Entry of July 31, 2008 electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association20
08/22/2008Additional initial comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.8
08/22/2008Comments of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. to the Commission July 31, 2008 entry filed by W. Adams.8
07/31/2008Service notice.18
07/31/2008Entry ordering AT&T's motion for protective order is granted; that OCC's request to disregard AT&T's supplemental affidavit is denied; that Rule 10(B) be reopened for comment in accordance with Finding (9); that Rule 10(B) not be enforced until the Commission makes a determination in this docket; that AT&T's waiver request be held in abeyance pending resolution of this issue.8
07/28/2008Memorandum Reply to OCC's Memo Contra to AT&T Ohio's supplemental information. electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio6
07/21/2008Comments on the affidavit of Cathy Pleines supplementing AT&T Ohio's May 28, 2008 request for waiver by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel12
07/17/2008Confidential target for affidavit of Cathy Pleines filed by M.Fenlon on behalf of AT&T. 1
07/17/2008Affidavit of Cathy Pleines filed by M.R. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 10
07/17/2008Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by M.R. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 9
07/09/2008Entry denying AT&T's application for rehearing; that AT&T's request for additional time is denied; that OCC's rehearing application is granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission to make the clarifications it has set forth in Findings (11) through (15) of this entry. 18
07/09/2008Service Notice9
07/02/2008Notice of withdrawal of The Ohio Telecom Association to Withdraw a Portion of its June 23, 2008 Filing electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.5
06/25/2008Motion to strike a portion of the Ohio Telecom Association's memorandum contra application for rehearing, memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.10
06/23/2008Memorandum Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC's Memorandum in Opposition to the Application for Rehearing of the OCC electronically filed by Evelyn W King on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY7
06/23/2008Reply AT&T Ohio's Reply to OCC's Memorandum Contra electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio6
06/23/2008 Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's Application for Rehearing by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.19
06/23/2008Memorandum contra to the application for rehearing of the OCC electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.8
06/23/2008Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to the application for rehearing of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, and in response to the application for rehearing of AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.9
06/16/2008Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's request for waiver by the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L.22
06/13/2008AT&T Ohio's Application for Rehearing electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.16
06/13/2008Application for Rehearing of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.19
05/28/2008Request for waiver electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.20
05/15/2008Service notice.9
05/14/2008Entry ordering OTA's motion seeking blanket waiver from the obligations of Rule 4901:1-5-10 (B), 0.A.C., labeled as "the Service Termination Rule", is denied; AT&T's request to treat it's reply memorandum as an individual request for waiver of the Service Termination Rule is denied; a limited waiver of the new Service Termination Rule is granted in accordance with the directives of Finding 7, to the extent necessary to address the concerns of companies with respect to residental and business customers whose stand-alone BLES accounts consist of two or three BLES lines; the Commission will not begin enforcing the new rule provision until January, 1, 2009.13
05/14/2008Entry ordering Verizon's May 2, 2008 request to withdraw, in all respects, its April 2, 2008 motion for waiver and request for alternative relief in the form of a grace period under Rule 4901:1-5-08(D), O.A.C., is granted.2
05/14/2008Entry ordering that Verizon's April 30, 2008 request to withdraw, in all respects, its March 18, 2008 motion for waiver and request for alternative relief is granted.2
05/02/2008Service notice.9
05/02/2008Entry ordering that Verizon's request for alternative relief in the form of a grace period has not become approved under any automatic process and is hereby suspended. (DF)2
05/02/2008Notice of withdrawal on behalf of Verizon North Inc., to withdraw motion, electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge. 4
04/30/2008Notice of withdrawal of motion on behalf of Verizon North Inc., electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge. 4
04/25/2008Comments on Verizon's March 18, 2008 motion for waiver and request for a grace period, and supporting documentation, filed by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter. 21
04/24/2008Reply memorandum filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Lodge. 5
04/22/2008Letter providing additional information regarding Verizon's request for waiver filed March 18, 2008, filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by C. Cole. 2
04/21/2008Letter providing additional information regarding Verizon's request for waiver filed March 18, 2008 filed by C. Cole. (FAX)2
04/21/2008Letter and documentation on behalf of Verizon to supplement its request for waiver filed March 18, 2008 filed by C. Cole.3
04/17/2008Memorandum contra Verizon North, Inc.'s April 2, 2008 motion for waiver and request for a grace period filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter. 9
04/17/2008Reply Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in support of application for an order granting waiver of Ohio Administrative Code Section 4901:1-5-10, electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.10
04/17/2008Reply filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio, AT&T Long Distance, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., and TCG Ohio by J. Kelly. 12
04/17/2008Letter and documentation to supplement Verizon's request for waiver filed on March 18, 2008, filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)4
04/14/2008Reply memorandum filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Lodge.6
04/07/2008Memorandum contra Verizon North, Inc.'s March 18, 2008 motion for waiver and request for a grace period filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.11
04/07/2008Memorandum contra application of the Ohio Telecom Association for waiver filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.14
04/02/2008Motion for waver of Verizon North, Inc., request for grace period, and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge.16
03/20/2008Application of the Ohio Telecom Association for an order granting waiver of Ohio Administrative Code; Section 4901:1-5-10 filed by C. Flahive.8
03/19/2008Finding and order stating the Embarq's application for waiver is granted in accordance with finding 5.6
03/19/2008Service Notice8
03/18/2008Motion for waiver and memorandum in support under O.A.C. Code. 4901:1-5-02(B)(1) and request for grace period under O.A.C. Code 4901:1-05-08(D) filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.14
12/21/2007Confidential Exhibit Timeline 5, filed by Meggan A. Rawlin on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Ohio Edison Company and Toledo Edison Company and American Transmission Systems, Inc.(2pgs)1
12/12/2007Reply memorandum of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq in support of waiver application filed by J. Stewart.6
12/05/2007Service Notice8
12/05/2007Entry ordering that AT&T Ohio's motion for waivers is granted in part and denied in part as addressed in this entry.6
12/03/2007Memorandum contra Embarq's application for waiver by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.21
11/26/2007AT&T Ohio's Reply filed by M. Ryan Fenlon.7
11/20/2007Entry amending Rules 4901:1-5-05(C) and 4901:1-7-26(A) (1)(b}(i) in accordance with finding 4.8
11/20/2007Service Notice65
11/15/2007Memorandum contra request for waivers of AT&T Ohio filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Council.18
11/14/2007Application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.39
11/02/2007AT&T Ohio's request for a waiver of, and additional time to implement certain minimum telephone service standards, filed by M. Fenlon.9
10/10/2007Service Notice65
10/10/2007Entry ordering that the last sentence of Finding (2) of the September 26, 2007 entry be amended in the manner set out in Finding (2) of this entry nunc pro tunc. 2
09/26/2007Service Notice65
09/26/2007Entry ordering that all of the findings be observed by all telecommunications providers who are subject to the MTSS.2
09/06/2007Service notice.8
09/05/2007Finding and Order granting request to modify Rule 4901:1-5-02 in accordance with finding 3; the revised rule is adopted and it be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, the Legislative Service Commission and the Secretary of State.4
08/29/2007Service notice.72
08/29/2007Entry ordering that in accordance with finding 7, the application for rehearing is granted; that rule 4901:1-5-04(E) is modified as set forth in finding 7.6
08/20/2007Memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, the Appalachian People's Action Coalition, the City of Columbus, the City of Cleveland, the City of Toledo, the Village of Holland, the City of Maumee, the City of Northwood, the City of Oregon, the City of Perrysburg, the City of Sylvania, and Lucas County filed by D. Bergman, E. Jacobs, M. Smalz, J. Klein, S. Beeler, K. Bruce, S. McAdams, B. Ballenger, P. Goldberg, P. Gwyn, P. Skaff, J. Moan, and L. Keiffer. 11
08/10/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T.9
07/12/2007Service Notice40
07/11/2007Entry ordering that rehearing is granted in part and denied in part; that all rehearing arguments not specifically addressed are denied.89
04/04/2007Service Notice7
04/04/2007Entry on rehearing ordering that the application filed by the Consumer Groups, AT&T Ohio, CBT, Embarq, OTA and Verizon are granted for further consideration of the matters specified in each of their six respective rehearing applications.3
03/30/2007Notice of appearance of counsel of William A. Adams on behalf of Windstream Ohio and Windstream Western Reserve.8
03/20/2007Memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq to application for rehearing of Ohio Consumers' Counsel et al. filed by J. Stewart. (ORIGINAL)5
03/19/2007Memorandum contra applications for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter, OCC; Appalachian People's Action Coalition filed by M. Smalz; J. Meissner, Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition and Consumers for Fair Utility Rates; E. Jacobs, The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; The City of Cleveland filed by H. Madorsky, R. Triozzi and H. Madorsky, the City of Cleveland; R. Pfeiffer, Jr. and J. Klein the City of Columbus; K. Bruce and L. Kovacik, The City of Toledo; S, McAdams, Maumee; B. Ballenger, Northwood; P. Goldberg, Oregon; P. Gwyn, Perrysburg; P. Skaff, the Village of Holland; J. Moan, The City of Sylvania, L. Keiffer, Lucas County.37
03/19/2007Memorandum of Verizon North Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC dba Verizon Access Transmission Services and MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions in opposition to application of the Consumer Groups for rehearing filed by C. Flahive.8
03/19/2007Memorandum of Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to application of Consumer Groups for rehearing filed by C. Flahive.13
03/19/2007Memorandum of AT&T contra the applications for rehearing of the Consumer Groups filed by M. Fenlon.23
03/19/2007Memorandum contra applications for rehearing of Consumers Groups of United Telephone Company dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart. (FAX)6
03/19/2007Memorandum contra of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by S. Howard.4
03/09/2007Application for rehearing, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq by J. Stewart.7
03/09/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC by D. Hart.7
03/09/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter, for Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition by M. Smalz, for Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition by J. Meissner; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Counsel for AARP Ohio by R. Bridges; City of Cleveland by H. Madorsky; City of Columbus by J. Klein; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; City Maumee by S. McAdams; City of Northwood by B. Ballenger; City of Oregon by P. Goldberg; City of Perrysburg by P. Gwyn; Village of Holland by P. Skaff; City of Sylvania by J. Moan; for Lucas County by L. Keiffer59
03/09/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio, AT&T Communications of Ohio, and TCG Ohio by M. Fenlon.38
03/09/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC dba Verizon Access Transmission Services and MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., dba Verizon Long Distance and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions by T. Lodge.22
03/09/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by T. Lodge.22
02/07/2007Opinion and Order ordered; that this existing Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C., is hereby rescinded; that the new Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C., as set forth in the appendix to this opinion and order, is hereby adopted. 106
02/07/2007Service Notice95
01/05/2007Correspondence letter regarding the proposed changes in consumer protection and the possible price increases, filed by consumer R. Kelly.5
01/04/2007Correspondence letter opposing the proposals of the telephone companies, filed by consumer A. Budish.1
12/29/2006Reply to memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq to motion to reopen for the limited purpose of supplementing the record, filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.7
12/29/2006Letter objecting to the proposals for protection for telephone customers, filed by N. Shea. (consumer)1
12/26/2006Letter to OCC regarding rate increases by telephone companies, filed by consumer O. Gatherson.1
12/19/2006Memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq to motion to reopen for the limited purpose of supplementing the record of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Stewart .5
12/14/2006 Motion to reopen for the limited purpose of supplementing the record, memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by R. Reese.8
12/12/2006Letter with concerns over basic rates being requested by local telephone companies, filed by consumer W. Hreha.2
12/12/2006Letter expressing concerns on the local basic rate hikes requested by telephone companies, filed by consumer R. Miller.1
09/25/2006Reply comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC filed by J. Brenzel. (Original)24
09/25/2006Reply comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC filed by J. Brenzel. (FAX)25
09/22/2006Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.11
09/22/2006Reply comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.6
09/22/2006Joint reply comments of Time Warner of Ohio, LLC and BullsEye Telecom, Inc.filed by S. Bloomfield.6
09/22/2006Reply comments of Cingular Wireless filed by J. Lang.7
09/22/2006Reply comments of Verizon Wireless filed by T. Lodge.6
09/22/2006Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter and D. Bergmann, City of Cleveland by R. Triozzi, City of Columbus by J. Klein, Appalachian People's Action by M. Smalz, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, AARP Ohio by R. Bridges, City of Toledo by K. Bruce, City of Maumee by S. McAdams, City of Northwood by B. Ballenger, City of Oregon by P. Goldberg, City of Perrysburg by P.Gwyn, City of Holland by P. Skaff, City of Sylvania by J. Moan and Lucas County by L. Keiffer.78
09/22/2006Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard.4
09/22/2006Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Nextel Corporation by W. Newcomb Jr.13
09/22/2006Reply comments filed on behalf of Verizon by T. Lodge.16
09/22/2006Reply comments of AT&T filed by M. Fenlon.54
09/14/2006Certificate of service filed by J. Stewart on behalf of Embarq.1
09/12/2006Certificate of service of Ohio Telecom Association fled by T. Lodge.3
09/12/2006Certificate of service of Verizon North Inc filed by T.Lodge.3
09/12/2006Certificate of service of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio LLC filed by T. O'Brien2
09/12/2006Certificate of service of Sage Telecom, Inc. filed by T. O'Brien.2
09/12/2006Certificate of service on behalf of BullsEye Telecom, Inc. filed by T. O'Brien.2
09/11/2006Initial comments filed by J. Brenzel on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC.18
09/11/2006Certificate of service filed by T. Etter on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel.2
09/08/2006Comments of Bullseye Telecom, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.8
09/08/2006Comments of Sage Telecom, Inc. filed by T. O'Brien. 11
09/08/2006Comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LLC filed by S. Bloomfield.12
09/08/2006Initial comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by S. Howard.8
09/08/2006Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by J. Brenzel.(FAX)18
09/08/2006Comments of Verizon North, Inc. filed by T. Lodge.49
09/08/2006Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition filed by M Smalz, Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition filed by J. Meissner, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, AARP Ohio filed by R. Bridges, The City of Cleveland filed by H. Madorsky, The City of Columbus filed by J. Klein, The City of Toledo filed by K. Bruce, The City of Holland filed by P. Skaff , The City of Maumee filed by S. McAdams, The City of Northwood filed by B. Ballenger, The City Oregon filed by P. Goldberg, The City of Perrysburg filed by P. Gwyn, The City of Sylvania filed by J. Moan and Lucas County filed by L. Keiffer.100
09/08/2006Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.56
09/08/2006Comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed J. Stewart.48
09/08/2006AT&T'S initial comments filed by M. Fenlon.43
08/10/2006Service Notice53
08/09/2006Entry ordering that the interested persons and entities are hereby authorized to file initial and/ or reply comments in accordance with finding (5).38
09/06/2005In the matter of the review of the Commission's Minimum Telephone Service Standards found in Chapter 4901:1-5 of the Ohio Administrative Code.1