| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 02/15/2002 | Report of the East Ohio Gas Company d/b/a Dominion East Ohio filed by H. Liebman. | 13 |
| 12/11/2001 | Memorandum of ex parte communications filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. | 4 |
| 12/10/2001 | Correspondence letter supporting the Commission's decision, filed by State Representative Annie L. Key. | 1 |
| 12/10/2001 | Correspondence letter in support of the Commission's ruling, filed by L. Calabrese, Commission of Catholic Community Action. | 1 |
| 12/04/2001 | Memorandum of Ex Parte Communication on behalf of OPAE, filed by D. Rinebolt. | 3 |
| 12/04/2001 | Memorandum letter in support of the Dominion East Ohio Gas program, filed by various customers. | 5 |
| 12/04/2001 | Resolution on behalf of the Struthers City Council, filed by T. Constantino. | 3 |
| 12/03/2001 | Memorandum of Ex Parte Communication on behalf of applicant, filed by D. Rinebolt. (FAX) | 3 |
| 11/29/2001 | Entry ordering that the motion to intervene of the EOGC is granted; that the applications for rehearing and the motion for clarification are granted or denied to the extent discussed herein; that East Ohio may continue, until December 31, 2001, to use the overaccrual from the depreciation reserve to match the initial payments made by residential customers whose service had been disconnected as of October 31, 2001, or who, as of October 31, 2001, had a current disconnect notice; that East Ohio is authorized to defer residential customer account balances as of December 31, 2001, for those accounts elligible for the Payment Matching Program above the amount of uncollectibles expense recovered in its current base rates and retained from supplier receivable discounts; that East Ohio make the filings discussed by February 15, 2002, and serve copies of the filings upon all parties of record.
Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Ronda Hartman Fergus. | 10 |
| 11/28/2001 | Letter opposing the decision of the Dominion East Ohio Gas, filed on behalf of the New Philadelphia city council. | 2 |
| 11/28/2001 | Staff erratum, filed by J. Bair | 2 |
| 11/21/2001 | Resolution No. 01-10048 filed on behalf of the City of Struthers by T. Constantino. | 3 |
| 11/21/2001 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, filed on behalf of applicant by H. Liebman. | 4 |
| 11/21/2001 | Resolution No. 01-10049 filed on behalf of the City of Struthers by T. Constantinol | 3 |
| 11/21/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Ohio Oil & Gas Assoc. by W. Airey. | 12 |
| 11/20/2001 | Petition opposing the PUCO ruling, filed by various consumers. | 4 |
| 11/20/2001 | Memorandum of ex parte Communication documenting the 11/15/01 meetings, on behalf of Dominion East Ohio filed by P. Ruxin. | 5 |
| 11/19/2001 | Letter to Chairman Schriber regarding a decision to allow Dominion East Ohio to distribute the money that they overcharges their customers to customers who received a disconnect notice or were disconnect as of October 31, 2001, filed by M. Cirelli and R. Otterman, State Representative | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Request for reconsideration filed by Shirley Smith, State Representative | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Request for reconsideration filed by State Representatives Mary Cirelli and Robert Otterman. | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Request for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing filed on behalf of East Ohio Gas Co. dba Dominion East Ohio by H. Liebman. | 3 |
| 11/19/2001 | Request to have to decision be reconsidered by the Commission, filed by State Representatives Mary Cirelli and Robert Otterman. | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the decision, filed by State Representative Shirley A. Smith. | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy by D. Rinebolt. | 13 |
| 11/16/2001 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. | 7 |
| 11/15/2001 | Correspondence letter. | 1 |
| 11/15/2001 | Correspondence letter supporting the recent decision to approve a case involving Domininion East Ohio and a plan to match payments to those in need. | 1 |
| 11/15/2001 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed by H. Liebman on behalf of East Ohio Gas Company d/b/a Dominion East Ohio. | 19 |
| 11/14/2001 | Correspondence letter against the plan to give back the money. | 1 |
| 11/13/2001 | Letter stating that the OCC application for rehearing, inadvertently omitted W. Jonathan Airey, counsel for the Ohio Oil and Gas Association. The OCC contacted Mr. Airey on 11/9/01 and immediately served him with an electronic copy of the application for rehearing. Filed by J. Heston | 1 |
| 11/08/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. | 8 |
| 11/08/2001 | Correspondence supporting re-hearing, filed by various consumers. | 1 |
| 11/06/2001 | Correspondence supporting re-hearing, filed by Lynn Gessler. | 1 |
| 11/05/2001 | Application for rehearing, filed by R. Tongren. | 26 |
| 11/02/2001 | Service Notice | 7 |
| 10/30/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the Commission's decision, filed by Tom Ivinskas, Krista Caddell, and Noritea Dean. | 3 |
| 10/30/2001 | Correspondence letters opposing the Commission's decision, filed by various consumers. | 5 |
| 10/30/2001 | Correspondence letters opposing the decision to not refund any of the monies to the people who paid, filed by John Hanigofsky, Mary Ellen Csonka, Marie Power, and Mary Gardner. | 5 |
| 10/29/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing proposal filed by the staff at Lakewood Christian Service Center. | 1 |
| 10/29/2001 | Correspondence letters from various consumers. | 8 |
| 10/29/2001 | Correspondence letter from Mr. James Harig opposing proposed distribution plan | 5 |
| 10/26/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the Commission's decision, filed by Dorothy Duxbury. | 1 |
| 10/26/2001 | Letter stating that, based on the entries dated October 24 and 25, 2001, Dominion East Ohio is willing to match the first payment made before December 31, 2001, by customers that are currently disconnected or will have a disconnect notice in hand by October 31, 2001, filed by B. Klink. | 1 |
| 10/26/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the Commission's decision, filed by Ellen Hammond. | 1 |
| 10/26/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the PUCO decision, filed by Darlene Dague. | 1 |
| 10/26/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the PUCO decision in this case, filed by Kelly Horter. | 1 |
| 10/26/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that all customers should receive rebate, filed by Shirley Douglas. | 1 |
| 10/25/2001 | Service Notice. | 5 |
| 10/25/2001 | Service Notice. | 5 |
| 10/25/2001 | Entry ordering that any East Ohio customer can be reconnected according to the requirements of the October 16, 2001, entry in Case No. 01-2588-GE-UNC; that program allows customers at or below 200 percent of the poverty level to have their $175 reconnection payment automatically matched dollar-for-dollar; customers above 200 percent of the poverty level must make a minimum payment of $250 in order to take advantage of the Payment Matching Program; there is no requirement for any East Ohio customer to pay more that $175, plus the reconnection fee, to have service restored this winter; for those above 200 percent of poverty level who can pay $250 or more, this is an opportunity through the matching program to eliminate a greater portion of their existing arrearage. (AE) | 2 |
| 10/25/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that the monies should be distributed evenly, filed by Linda Lockhart. | 1 |
| 10/25/2001 | Correspondence letter requesting that all people be refunded the monies, filed by Pamela Tolin. | 2 |
| 10/25/2001 | Correspondence letter requesting that each customer be paid the rebate, filed by Richard Roman. | 2 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence letters stating that the monies should be divided among all the customers, filed by Suzanne Rupert, Lula MCCrady, and Angela Bienemann. | 3 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the proposed plan of monies going to the delinquent customers, filed by William Hill. | 1 |
| 10/24/2001 | Entry ordering that the motions to intervene of OCC, OPAE, and Association are granted; that the motion pro hac vice to allow David C. Rinebolt to appear and participate on behalf of OPAE in this proceeding is granted; that the new accrual rates discussed in Finding 5 and 22 be effective January 1, 2001 and that the applicant is required to submit a new depreciation study for all plant accounts no later than September 1, 2006; that the Payment Matching Program and bad-debt rider are approved as discussed in Findings 22 and 23; that the proposals to increase the reconnection fee from $175 to $250 for certain customers is approved to the extent discussed in Findings 25 and 26; that the request to waive the reconnection time frame of Rule 4901:1-18-06(A), O.A.C. is moot. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Donald L. Mason. Separate Opinion of Commissioner Clarence D. Rogers, Jr. | 12 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence letter from Clotilde Vivino in favor of refunds for all customers | 1 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence from Representative Kerry Metzger opposing refund proposal | 2 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence from Rose Singer in favor of refunds for all customers. | 1 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence from Eleanor Wolf in favor of refunds for all customers. | 1 |
| 10/24/2001 | Correspondence from Faith Bordine in favor of the payment matching program. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter in favor of DEO refunding to all customers, filed by Eleanor Wolf. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that everyone should receive rebate, filed by Faith Bordine. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing disbursement of money, filed by Todd Kester. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the disbursement of money, filed by Patty Burdeshaw. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the way DEO is going to disburse the money, filed by Ann Schneider. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that rebate should go to all customers, filed by Debra Bush. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that rebate should go to paying customers, filed by Goldie Eudy. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that rebate should be go all customers, filed by Richard Williams. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that the money should be distributed evenly, filed by Eloise Schill. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that the credit should go to all customers, filed by Faye Moyer. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that only the people who paid should receive the rebate, filed by Paul Bailey. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that the rebate should go to only the people who paid, filed by Mary Carlton. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that every customer should get the rebate, filed by Mary Scrimager. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that money should be given back to people that pay only, filed by Thelma Neneth. | 1 |
| 10/23/2001 | Correspondence letter requesting only customers that overpaid should receive money, filed by Jean Harper. | 1 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Deanna Rose, City of Lakewood, Ohio. (Fax copy) | 1 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed on behalf of Consumers for Fair Utility Rates by T. Walters. | 2 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by the Lakewood Christian Service Center. | 2 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that money should be distributed to customers, filed by Hollis Jamison. | 1 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that surplus should be distributed fairly, filed by Barbara Conner. | 1 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by James Lutz. | 3 |
| 10/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Shirley McLaughlin. | 1 |
| 10/22/2001 | Reply filed on behalf of OCC by J. Utter Heston. | 7 |
| 10/22/2001 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support and comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Oil & Gas Assoc. by W. Airey. | 9 |
| 10/19/2001 | Correspondence letter stating that he wants the customers who made the overpayments to be reimbursed any overages, filed by Ray Gentile. | 4 |
| 10/19/2001 | Correspondence letter agreeing that the money should be given back to the customers equally, filed by Julie Anderson. | 1 |
| 10/18/2001 | Reserve adjustment staff review. (filed on 10/17/2001) under 86-297-GA-AIR | 7 |
| 10/18/2001 | Reply of the East Ohio Gas Company d/b/a Dominion East Ohio to comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 15 |
| 10/18/2001 | History and pending report. | 1 |
| 10/16/2001 | Depreciation study continued. (Part 2 of 2) | 213 |
| 10/16/2001 | Depreciation study filed on behalf of applicant by H. Liebman. (Part 1 of 2) | 218 |
| 10/16/2001 | Motion to intervene, memorandum in support and comments and motion to practice pro hac vice before the Commission, filed on behalf of the Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy by D. Rinebolt. (Original copy) | 14 |
| 10/16/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed on behalf of Consumers for Fair Utility Rates by T. Walters. (Fax copy) | 2 |
| 10/15/2001 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. | 3 |
| 10/15/2001 | Motion to intervene, memorandum in support and comments and motion to practice pro hac vice before the Commission filed on behalf of Ohio Partners For Affordable Energy by D. Rinebolt. (Fax copy) | 14 |
| 10/12/2001 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Utter-Heston. | 17 |
| 10/12/2001 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. (Fax copy) | 3 |
| 10/05/2001 | Tariff, original sheet F-BDR 1, filed on behalf of applicant by H. Liebman. | 2 |
| 10/04/2001 | In the matter of the application of The East Ohio Gas Company dba Dominion East Ohio for approval, pursuant to Revised Code Section 4909.16, of a payment matching program and other matters. | 6 |