DIS - Case Record for 01-1450-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-1450-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: WADE McCALF vs VERIZON NORTH,INC.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 6/20/2001
Date Closed: 5/9/2002
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/30/2002Revised final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section F, 17th sheet 3.1, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by D. Terry.2
08/13/2002Revised tariff sheets reflect the establishment of two-way Extended Local Calling Plan (ELCP) Service between the Verizon exchange of Richwood and the Marysville exchange of Sprint filed by T. Colquitt.3
07/09/2002Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between Verizon's Richwood exchange and Sprint's Marysville exchange will be September 10, 2002 at 12:01 am, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.1
06/20/2002Letter regarding the EAS between the Marysville and Richwood exchanges filed by B. Donahue.2
05/09/2002Finding & Order approving the stipulation in its entirety; that Verizon and Sprint are authorized to provide two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the Richwood Exchange and the Marysville Exchange.6
05/09/2002Service notice.3
04/18/2002Addition to the stipulation, agreement and recommendation, (page 5) filed by W. Keating.2
04/15/2002Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed.4
01/11/2002Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating.2
12/07/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook.47
12/04/2001Information response of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, filed by J. Stewart.7
10/31/2001Affidavits filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance, Verizon Select Services Inc., and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions (collectively Verizon) by K. Roberts-Murphy.6
10/29/2001Affidavit stating required calling information was provided to Sprint and Verizon North, Inc. filed by M. O'Leary on behalf of Qwest.2
10/26/2001Affidavit of Genevieve Boehm filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by G. Boehm.2
10/18/2001Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T. (Filed 10/17/01)3
10/09/2001Entry scheduling a conference at 10:00 a.m. on December 12, 2001, Hearing Room 11-F, Commission offices. (AE)3
10/09/2001Service Notice3
10/05/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (Original copy)2
10/05/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating.2
10/04/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.4
10/03/2001Service Notice.3
09/12/2001Entry ordering that Verizon and Sprint file their respective answers and serve a copy upon the spokesperson by October 5, 2001; that AT&T, WorldCom, Qwest, GTE Corp., and Sprint Communications provide the information as required by Finding 5; that AT&T, WorldCom, Qwest, GTE Corp., and Sprint Communications file an affidavit with the Commission as required by Finding 6; that Verizon and Sprint coordinate all calling information in accordance with Finding 7 and ensure that all the IXCs are supplying calling data from the same time frame; that a conference shall be scheduled in this matter by an entry to be issued in the near future. (AE)7
09/12/2001Service Notice.2
08/29/2001Additional signatures supporting the petition, filed by various consumers.8
06/20/2001In the matter of the petition of Wade McCalf and subscribers of the 740 exchange of Verizon North Inc. for extended area service to the 614 exchange of Verizon North Inc. and Ameritech Ohio.8