DIS - Case Record for 01-0166-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-0166-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: LISA ANN BRICKNER VS SPRINT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 1/24/2001
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
04/10/2003Entry ordered that this case is dismissed and closed of record.5
03/11/2003Entry ordering that the spokesperson contact the Commission by March 25, 2003 or the Attorney Examiner will recommend to the Commission that this case be dismissed. (GS)4
05/24/2002Letter stating that Sprint will implement one-way flat rate EAS from Luckey to Bowling Green, Pemberville, Perrysburg and Toledo on July 31, 2002 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue.2
07/09/2001Request to hold case number 01-166-TP-PEX in abeyance pending the result of case number 00-127-TP-COI filed by L. Brickner.1
05/14/2001Letter stating that Ameritech would not incur exceptionally heavy investments nor exceptionally high costs to institute extended area service between its Toledo, Perrysburg and Maumee exchanges and the Luckey exchange of United Telephone Company dba Sprint, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by S. Rawlings.1
04/19/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.70
04/17/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.47
03/15/2001Affidavit of Kim Wright filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by K. Wright.2
03/14/2001Affidavit of James Abbott filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Abbott.5
03/12/2001Affidavit of Stephanie Vishab filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International Telecom Corp., by S. Vishab.2
02/27/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (Original)3
02/26/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (Fax copy)3
02/23/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.3
02/23/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.3
02/23/2001Entry scheduling a conference at 10:00 a.m. on May 22, 2001, at the Commission offices, Hearing Room 11-F. (AE)3
02/22/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.4
02/02/2001Entry ordering that Sprint/United, Verizon and Ameritech file their respective written answer by February 26, 2001; that the IXCs provide the information required by Finding 3 to GTE and Sprint/United by March 15, 2001; that each of the IXCs file an affidavit by March 15, 2001; that the respondents coordinate all the calling information in accordance with Finding 5; that the respondents provide the information required by Finding 6 by April 19, 2001; that the respondents provide the information required by Finding 7 by May 10, 2001. (AE)8
01/24/2001In the matter of the petition of Lisa-Ann Brickner and numerous subscribers of the Luckey Exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint for extended area service between the Luckey exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and the Bowling Green, Genoa and Pemberville exchanges of Verizon North, the Moline exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, and the Maumee, Perrysburg and Toledo exchanges of Ameritech Ohio.13