DIS - Case Record for 00-1188-TP-ARB Skip to main content

Case Record For:

00-1188-TP-ARB

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, INC.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ARB-Petition for arbitration
Date Opened: 6/30/2000
Date Closed: 4/24/2003
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/23/2003Preliminary Pretrial Order filed by Norah McCann King, United States Magistrate Judge.2
04/24/2003Entry ordering that the interconnection agreements are approved and closing this case of record.2
04/24/2003Service notice filed.3
03/31/2003Final interconnection agreement between SBC and AT&T continued. (Part 2 of 2)225
03/31/2003Final interconnection agreement between SBC Ohio and AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by S. Howard. (Part 1 of 2)226
03/31/2003Final interconnection agreement between SBC and TCG continued. (Part 2 of 2)224
03/31/2003Final interconnection agreement filed on behalf of SBC Ohio and TCG Ohio by S. Howard. (Part 1 of 2)224
02/13/2003Entry ordering that application for rehearing is granted in part and denied in part.10
01/30/2003Response to AT&T's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of SBC-Ohio by M. Fenlon.9
01/21/2003Application for rehearing filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.10
12/19/2002Entry ordering that the parties should proceed with negotiating a final interconnection agreement and file the requisite agreement consistent with this entry.11
10/15/2002Joint filing of AT&T Communications continue part 2 of 2.235
10/15/2002AT&T Communications of Ohio, TCG Ohio and SBC Ameritech of Ohio joint filing reflecting settlement negotiations filed by counsel for AT&T, B. Kahn and counsel for SBC, M. Stemm. (part 1 of 2)250
10/15/2002TCG Ohio, AT&T Communications of Ohio and SBC Ameritech of Ohio joint filing reflecting settlement negotiations filed by counsel for AT&T, B. Kahn and counsel SBC, M. Stemm. (part 1 of 2)250
10/15/2002Joint filing of TCG Ohio continue part 2 of 2.233
07/22/2002Response to AT&T's submission of proposed interconnection agreement language, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.3
07/09/2002Submission of proposed interconnection agreement language filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.4
07/03/2002Change of attorney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.1
06/10/2002Ameritech Ohio's Reponse to AT&T submission of supplemental authority filed by M. Stemm.3
05/21/2002Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.106
03/05/2002Clarification of their February 22, 2002 filing, submitted on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa.4
03/04/2002Objection and reply to AT&T's updated contract proposal and response to January 31, 2002 entry, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.13
02/26/2002Response letter stating that the agreement which provides that Ameritech Ohio shall have until 4/4/02 to reply to the filing of AT&T titled "AT&T's Updated Contract Proposal, filed by M. Stemm.1
02/22/2002Letter stating parties obtained a one week extension of time to continue negotiations, interconnection agreement relating to unbundled network element combinations, filed by joint parties M. Stemm and B. Kahn. 1
02/22/2002Updated contract proposal in response to 1/31/02 entry filed by D. Chorzempa on behalf of AT&T.7
02/15/2002Request for an extension of time until 2/22/02 filed by M. Stemm, Ameritech Ohio and B. Kahn, AT&T and TCG Ohio.1
01/31/2002Service Notice3
01/31/2002Entry on rehearing denying AT&T's application for rehearing; that the parties update the list of disputed interconnection language in accordance with Finding (7).8
12/13/2001Entry granting the application for rehearing for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.3
12/13/2001Service Notice.3
11/26/2001Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing of the Commission's 10/16/01 entry on rehearing.46
11/16/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.11
11/16/2001Reply to AT&T's November 8, 2001 initial comments and proposed conforming language following entry on rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.11
11/15/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.26
11/09/2001Errata to reply comments of AT&T on joint redlined interconnection agreement filed on 12/28/01, and initial comments supporting AT&T 'S 11/8/01 conforming language submission. Filed by D. Chorzempa2
11/08/2001Reply comments on joint redlined interconnection agreement filed on September 28, 2001, and initial comments supporting AT&T's November 8, 2001 conforming language submission, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.76
11/08/2001Reply to AT&T's comments in response to September 28, 2001 joint filing and initial comments in support of proposed language required by entry on rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.21
10/26/2001OH-Collocation Tab filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.10
10/19/2001Additional information filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.4
10/16/2001Entry ordering that AT&T's application for rehearing be granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the findings in this entry; that Ameritech's request for clarification is granted; that, on or before November 8, 2001, the parties should file their amended interconnection agreements for Commission review.14
10/12/2001Comments on redlined interconnection agreement jointly filed by the parties on September 28, 2001, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.22
10/12/2001Comments in response to September 28, 2001 joint filing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D.Chorzempa.19
10/05/2001Letter memorializing Ameritech Ohio's unopposed request to revise the deadlines for initial comments and replies in response to the parties' filing of conforming contract of September 28, 2001, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.1
09/28/2001Conforming interconnection agreement continued. (Part 2 of 2)253
09/28/2001Conforming interconnection agreement filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm; and AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn. (Part 1 of 2)250
08/27/2001Letter agreeing to extend the date for filing of a conforming contract to September 28, 2001, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.1
08/21/2001Letter in response to the Commission's request that they memorialize that, on or before June 7, 2001, the parties consented to another extension of the statutory nine month deadline for issuing arbitration awards, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm; and AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn.1
08/16/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by AT&T and Ameritech are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
08/16/2001Service Notice.2
08/14/2001Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn.74
08/02/2001Memorandum contra Ameritech's application for rehearing or, in the alternative, motion for clarification, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.20
08/02/2001Memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway.14
07/23/2001AT&T's application for rehearing filed by D. Chorzempa.25
07/23/2001Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, motion for clarification filed by M. Stemm on behalf of Ameritech.17
07/09/2001Service notice2
07/06/2001Entry ordering that the timeline for filing conforming agreements in this matter be extended until 8/27/01. (AE)1
06/21/2001Service Notice.2
06/21/2001Arbitration Award ordering that AT&T, TCG and Ameritech incorporate the directives as set forth in this award within their interconnection agreement; that, by August 27, 2001, AT&T, TCG, and Ameritech file in this docket their entire interconnection agreements for the Commission's review; if the parties are unable to agree upon entire interconnection agreements within this time frame, each party shall file for Commission review its version of the language that it believes should be used in a Commission-approved interconnection agreement; that, within ten days of the filing of the interconnection agreement, any party or other interested persons may file written comments supporting or opposing the proposed interconnection agreement and that any party or other interested persons may file responses to comments within five days thereafter; that any motions not expressly rules upon in this arbitration award are denied; that this docket shall remain open until further order of the Commission.65
06/21/2001Joint motion to extend time for submitting conforming agreements, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm; and AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG by D. Chorzempa.2
05/31/2001Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa.144
05/18/2001AT&T submission of supplemental authority. Respectfully submitted, by D. Chorzempa.7
05/11/2001Response to the Commission's request for an extension of the statutory nine month deadline for issuing arbitration awards, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio b M. Stemm.1
05/03/2001Letter stating that AT&T has no objection to the Commission's request for additional time to June 7, 2001, to issue an arbitration award in this matter, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.1
04/10/2001Attachment 1 to AT&T's reply to Ameritech's exceptions to arbitration panel report, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.48
04/09/2001Reply to AT&T's exceptions to arbitration panel report, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway.71
04/09/2001Reply to Ameritech's exceptions to arbitration panel report, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.71
04/03/2001Arbitration documents filed by M. Stemm continued. (Part 5 of 5)158
04/03/2001Arbitration documents filed by M. Stemm continued. (Part 3 of 5)201
04/03/2001Arbitration documents filed by M. Stemm continued. (Part 2 of 5)200
04/03/2001Arbitration documents filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (Part 1 of 5)202
04/02/2001Exceptions to the Arbitration Panel Report filed by D. Chorzempa on behalf of AT&T99
04/02/2001Exceptions to the Arbitration Panel's Report filed by M. Stemm on behalf of Ameritech80
04/02/2001Service Notice.2
03/30/2001Supplemental Panel Report ordering that, in order to afford the parties in this matter additional time to respond to the supplemental report, the filing time frames for the submission and serving of any exceptions and replies limited to Issue 87 are April 6, 2001 and April 13, 2001, respectively.3
03/20/2001Service Notice.2
03/19/2001Arbitration panel report filed119
02/23/2001Response to the Commission's request for an extension of the statutory nine month deadline for issuing arbitration awards, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.1
02/23/2001Response to request for an extension of the statutory nine month deadline for issuing arbitration awards, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.1
01/23/2001Notice of additional authority filed on behalf of applicants, AT&T Communications of Ohio, and TCG Ohio by B. kahn.43
01/17/2001Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.8
12/18/2000Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.23
11/21/2000Notice of additional authority filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa.166
11/01/2000Submission of joint matrix for orphan issues filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (7 pgs.)7
10/31/2000Supplemental brief on issues 97 and 101 filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (9 pgs.)9
10/26/2000Revised matrix filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn. (54 pgs.)54
10/26/2000Amended arbitration issue matrix filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by D. Conway. (47 pgs.)47
10/26/2000Response to AT&T's notice of errata, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (3 pgs.)3
10/24/2000Notice of additional authority and motion to strike portions of Ameritech Ohio's submission of supplemental authority, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chor- zempa. (30 pgs.)30
10/19/2000Submission of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (208 pgs.)208
10/19/2000Reply brief on issues 102-145 filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (37 pgs.)37
10/16/2000Noitce of errata filing submitted on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (174 pgs.)174
10/13/2000Post-hearing reply brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (232 pgs.)232
10/13/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (228 pgs.)228
10/06/2000Executed resolutions of issues filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio. Respectfully submitted by, A&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. TCG Ohio (6 pgs)6
10/05/2000Confidential direct testimony of James R. Smallwood on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. (Filed under Seal)118
10/05/2000Transcript of hearing (part 3 of 3-Vol. 5)174
10/05/2000Transcript of hearing (part 2 of 3) Vol. 5.175
10/05/2000Transcript filed for hearing held 9/21/00, (KS) (JA) (GS) (AW) (LS) (AF), 175 pgs., Submitted. (Volume V) (PUCO- Columbus, OH) 175
10/05/2000Confidential Exhibit No. 14B filed with transcript of hearing held 9/21/00, Volume V. (118 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)118
10/04/2000Ameritech Ohio's initial post-hearing brief. continued (part 2 of 2)157
10/04/2000Ameritech Ohio's initial post-hearing brief. (part 1 of 2)157
10/04/2000Initial brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (247 pgs.)247
09/29/2000Joint update on resolved issues filed by D. Chorzempa on behalf of AT&T Communications and TCG Ohio and M. Stemm on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. (3 pgs)3
09/28/2000Transcript filed for hearing held 9/14/00, (KS) (JA) (GS) (AW) (LS) (AF), 14 pgs., Con't. (Volume IV) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)14
09/27/2000Transcript filed for hearing held 9/13/00, (KS) (JA) (GS) (AW) (LS) (AF), 280 pgs., Con't. (Volume III) (PUCO- Columbus, OH)280
09/27/2000Summary matrix filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa.35
09/27/2000Arbitration issue matrix filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (46 pgs.)46
09/26/2000Transcript filed for hearing held 9/12/00, (KS) (JA) (GS) (AW) (LS) (AF), 266 pgs., Con't. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, Ohio)266
09/25/2000Transcript filed for hearing held 9/11/00, (KS) (JA) (GS) (AW) (LS) (AF), 238 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)238
09/25/2000Affidavit of Michael Kirksey filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Kirksey. (4 pgs.)4
09/20/2000Correspondence letter concerning the timeline for arbitration between AT&T, TCG Ohio and Ameritech Ohio, filing by parties counsel Benita Kahn on behalf of her clients by M. Stemm.1
09/20/2000Executed resolutions of issues filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (45 pgs.)45
09/20/2000Errata pertaining to Ameritech Ohio's report of disputed contract language that is not identified by the joint issues list, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
09/19/2000Response to AT&T's position statement on "orphaned" contract language, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (7 pgs.)7
09/19/2000Reply to Ameritech Ohio's report on disputed contract language that is not identified by the joint issues list, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.)3
09/18/2000Transcript for hearing held Sept. 14, 2000 before Arbitration Panel Members. (Continued)26
09/15/2000Report of disputed contract language that is not identified by the joint issues list, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (16 pgs.)16
09/15/2000Statement of position on "orphaned" contract language, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (14 pgs.)14
09/14/2000Errata to the joint contract submission, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn. (3 pgs.)3
09/11/2000Errata to pertaining to the joint contract submission, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.)3
09/07/2000Witness-issue list filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by A. Emerson. (2 pgs.)2
09/06/2000Joint contract submission continued. (Part 2 of 2)304
09/06/2000Joint contract submission filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and Ameritech Ohio by B. Kahn. (Section 1 of 2)303
09/06/2000Replacement testimony of John Puljung. Filed by B. Kahn (44 pgs)44
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Loren L. Vandagriff filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (12 pgs.)12
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Carol Chapman filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (26 pgs.)26
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Jacalyn Mindell filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (85 pgs.)90
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Donald Palmer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (53 pgs.)53
09/01/2000Arbitration package and prefiled direct testimonies of the following persons filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn: Dean R. Fassett Kathy Massura James D. Webber John J. Puljung Danial M. Noorani Cathleen M. Conway Scott L. Finney David L. Talbott0
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Eric L. Panfil filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (101 pgs.)101
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Craig S. Mindell filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (29 pgs.)29
09/01/2000Joint submission pending arbitration issues and disputed agreement language, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (100 pgs.)100
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Dave S. Borders filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (35 pgs.)35
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Sandra L. Lewis filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (14 pgs.)14
09/01/2000Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (7 pgs.)7
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Robert M. McDonald filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (20 pgs.)20
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Dr. Robert G. Harris filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (52 pgs.)a52
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Michael Kirksey filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (63 pgs.)63
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Michael D. Silver filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (65 pgs.)65
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Linda De Bella filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (12 pgs.)12
09/01/2000Witness issue list filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Michael Kirksey, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio.216
09/01/2000Confidential direct testimony of James R. Smallwood on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. (Filed Under Seal)126
09/01/2000Direct testimony of James R. Smallwood, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio.11
09/01/2000Testimony of David L Talbott on behalf of AT & T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio121
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Daniel M. Noorani filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio.48
09/01/2000Direct testimony of John J. Puljung filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio.40
09/01/2000Direct testimony of Cathleen M. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio.43
09/01/2000Testimony of Scott L. Finney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio.23
09/01/2000Testimony of Scott L. Finney on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc and TCG Ohio.41
09/01/2000Testimony of James D. Webber on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio.143
09/01/2000AT&T's arbitration package providing its prefiled testimony filed by B. Kahn.3
08/09/2000Entry ordering that the arbitration hearing shall commence at 10:00 a.m., on 9/11/2000, in the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio. (AE) (2 pgs)2
07/27/2000Correspondence letter to Ms. Benita Kahn and Mr. Michael Mulcahy regarding the conference on July 31, 2000, filed by K. Sheets, PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
07/25/2000Response to AT&T's petition for arbitration filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm.88
07/07/2000Letter regarding application for arbitration with Ohio Bell dba Ameritech Ohio filed by B. Kahn.1
07/07/2000Letter regarding application for arbitration with Ohio Bell dba Ameritech Ohio. Filed by B. Kahn (1 pg)1
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) ( part 25 of 25)199
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 24 of 25 )202
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 11 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 23 of 25 )202
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 22 of 25 )201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 10 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 21 of 25 )208
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 9 of 25)200
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 8 of 25)200
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 20 of 25 )201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 7of 25)203
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 6 of 25)199
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) ( part 5 of 25 )201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 4 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 3 of 25)200
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 2 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 1 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 18 of 25)169
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 17 of 25 )201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 16 of 25)200
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 14 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 15 of 25)201
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 13 of 25)203
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 19 of 25)203
06/30/2000Confidential information filed on behalf of applicants by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (part 12 of 25)201
06/30/2000In the matter of the application of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio for a petition for arbitration of interconnection rates, terms and conditions and related arrangements pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. (Part 1 of 2)231
06/30/2000Application continued. (See New Cases) (Part 2 of 2)241