Skip to main content

Case Record For:

00-0721-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: GARY & MARY JEANETTE/AMERITECH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 4/25/2000
Date Closed: 6/19/2003
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/19/2003Opinion & Order denying the request for two-way, nonoptional EAS between the Lindsey Exchange and the requested exchanges in the EAS petition; that SBC comply with the directives in this order concerning subscriber notification of its optional calling plans, and work with the Commission's Communications Management section to coordinate press releases pertaining to the implementation of the optional calling plans available to Lindsey Exchange subscribers.13
06/19/2003Service Notice.4
06/05/2003Updated information, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.4
01/24/2003Transcript of hearing held November 6, 2002.(Concluded)(KS)210
12/20/2002Additional information filed by S. Rawlings.2
11/27/2002Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by D. Bricely. (Fax)5
11/25/2002Revised information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.9
11/25/2002Third supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent SBC Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.89
11/21/2002Affidavit of Dorinda Lanier filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by D. Lanier.2
11/19/2002Proof of Publication filed.(Seneca Co.)1
11/05/2002Proof of Pub filed (Wood County-The Sentinel Tribune)1
10/31/2002Supplemental information response of Verizon North Inc. filed by C. Cole.7
10/30/2002Testimony of Kathleen M. Gentle-Klein filed by C. Rawlings.32
10/30/2002Supplemental information response of Verizon North Inc. filed by C. Cole. (FAX)7
10/29/2002Affidavit of Verizon Select Services Inc. filed by K. Hodges.4
10/29/2002Testimony of Rebecca J. Donahue on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint.10
10/23/2002Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed by C. Ware.4
10/21/2002Legal Notice.1
10/04/2002 Legal notice.9
10/04/2002 Legal notice.9
10/02/2002Entry ordering that the respondents provide updated cost information to Commission by December 30, 2002. (KS)7
09/06/2002Letter requesting information that is needed to schedule a hearing for the EAS case by staff K. Sheets.1
08/14/2002Letter on behalf of complainant Gary and Mary Jeanette, requesting a hearing be scheduled.2
07/12/2002Entry ordering that spokespersons should in writing on or before August 9, 2002, inform the examiner of a settlement in the case or request a hearing date. (AE)4
07/02/2002Response letter filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.4
06/10/2002Letter requesting the current status of the negotiations and provide any information the spokesperson might require, by staff member K. Sheets.2
01/18/2002Letter regarding inaction in case and request for response filed by K. Sheets on behalf of PUCO.1
03/19/2001Letter requesting that case be kept open filed by Gary and Mary Jeanette.1
02/22/2001Correspondence letter to Gary and Mary Jeanette, filed by K. Sheets, PUCO staff.1
08/18/2000Second supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (16 pgs.)16
08/18/2000Letter stating that institution of either measured rate or flat rate extended area service in this case would not cause the company to enter into exceptionally heavy investments in facilities nor to incur exceptionally high costs, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (1 pg.)1
08/18/2000Petition of Gary and Mary Jeanettte vs. Ameritech Ohio.1
08/16/2000Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
08/16/2000Supplemental information response of Verizon North Inc. filed by W. Keating.2
08/10/2000Information response of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint filed by B. Donahue.4
08/10/2000Information response filed by B. Donahue (4 pgs)4
08/07/2000Affidavit of GTE Long Distance, filed by P. Heise de Barros. (3 pgs.)3
08/07/2000Affidavit filed on behalf of GTE Long Distance by P. Heise de Barros. (3 pgs.)3
08/02/2000Correction to the content of GTE's motion of July 17, 2000, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating.1
07/26/2000Entry ordering that GTE temporarily, for the duration of its pilot program, be relieved of the requirement in this case of filing calling data for the toll routes involving the GTE exchanges noted in this entry to the Lindsey exchange. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
07/25/2000Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (52 pgs.)52
07/24/2000Entry ordering that GTELD's motion for an extension of time be granted in accordance with Finding 4; that, by August 4, 2000, the respondent telephone companies should update their information responses with the information supplied by GTELD. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
07/18/2000Motion for partial waiver of filing requirements and to be relieved from complying with directives to comple and pro- vide calling stastics and information pursuant to the entry issued May 18, 2000, and requesting that the Commission hold in abeyance what form of relief, if any, there should be from the GTE exchanges to the Lindsey exchange, filed on be- half of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.) (FILED 7/17/00)3
07/17/2000Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. 7
07/17/2000Answer of GTE North Inc. to complaint, filed by W. Keating.7
07/17/2000Information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings.35
07/17/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
07/17/2000Information response filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.35
07/17/2000Answer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.3
07/17/2000Motion for partial waiver of filing requirements, and to be relieved from complying with directives to compile and provide calling statics and information pursuant to the entry issued May 18, 2000, and requesting that the Commission hold in abeyance what form of relief, if any there should be from the GTE Exchanges to the Lindsey Exchange, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.3
07/14/2000Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Mazzola. (7 pgs.)7
07/14/2000Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE Communications Corp. dba GTE Long Distance by T. Mazzola.7
07/13/2000Answer of United Telephone Company of Ohio, dba Sprint. Filed by: J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
07/13/2000Information Response of United Telephone Company of Ohio, dba Sprint. Filed by: J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)9
07/13/2000Information response filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.9
07/13/2000Answer, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.4
06/16/2000Affidavit of James Abbott filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by J. Abbott. (4 pgs.)4
06/14/2000Affidavit information for MCI Telecommunications Corporation (MCI) filed by J. Sanders.1
06/14/2000Affidavit of Kim Wright on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. Filed by K. Wright (2 pgs)2
06/14/2000Affidavit information for MCI WorldCom. Filed by J. Sanders (1 pg)1
06/14/2000Affidavit information for MCI Telecommunications Corporation (MCI). Filed by J. Sanders (1 pg)1
05/18/2000Entry ordering that AT&T, MCI, LCI or Qwest, Sprint, World- com, and GTELD shall provide the information required by Finding 4 to Ameritech, GTE, and United and file an affi- david with the Commission in accordance with Finding 5 on or before June 16, 2000; tht Ameritech, GTE, and United comply with Finding 6; that Ameritech, GTE, and United shall file their written answers or other pleadings and the infor- mation requested in Finding 7 with the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants by July 17, 2000; that Ameritech, GTE, and United provide the information required by Finding 8 to the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants by August 18, 2000; scheduling a teleconference at 9:00 a.m. on July 27, 2000. (AE) (8 pgs.)8
04/25/2000In the matter of the petition of Gary and mary Jeanette and subscribers of the (419) 665 Sandusky exchange of Ameritech Ohio for extended area service into the 986, 483, 862, 547, 637, 639, 638, 992, 849, 898, 457, 837, and 734 exchanges of Ameritech Ohio. (20 pgs.)20