Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-0955-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: JAMES GERTZ/GTE NORTH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 6/18/1998
Date Closed: 10/7/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 45 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
02/01/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 388th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 11th sheet 8, original sheet 9, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
11/08/1999Correction to letter dated November 2, 1999; correct in- service date for the institution of two-way, measured-rate EAS between GTE's Wilmot and Sugarcreek exchanges is March 2, 2000 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)1
11/05/1999Letter stating that in-service date for the institution of two-way, measured-rate EAS between GTE's Wilmot and Sugar- creek exchanges will be April 2, 2000 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.) (FILED 11/3/99)1
10/07/1999Order on Rehearing that the complainant's first assignment of error is moot and second assignment of error is granted; that the Commission's February 17, 1999 decision is modified inpart such that the request for two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the Wilmot and Sugar Creek ex- changes is granted; that two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the Wilmot and Sugar Creek exchanges be insti- tuted within six months of this order and GTE make every effort to provide the service as soon as praticable; that GTE extablishas in-service date within two months of this Order on Rehearing, inform the Commission and the spokes- persons for the complainants of the date, and advise the Commission and the spokespersons no later than 60 days prior to the in-service date in the event that a date cannot be met; that this case be closed of record. (6 pgs.)6
09/21/1999Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 18th sheet 16, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (3 pgs.)3
09/14/1999Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 18th sheet 16, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by M. Prendergast. (3 pgs.)3
08/24/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 384th sheet 1, 83rd sheet 2, 26th sheet 12; Contents, 46th sheet 1; Section 2.1, 8th sheet 10, 4th sheet 33; Section 3 - Berlin, 17th sheet 1; Section 3 - Wilmot, 16th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (9 pgs.)9
08/11/1999Comments on the response of GTE North entry of cost studies/rehearing, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Gertz. (2 pgs.)2
08/02/1999Second supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
07/14/1999Entry ordering that on or before August 2, 1999, GTE either file a cost statement or detailed cost studies associated with the implementation of EAS between the Wilmot and Sugar Creek exchanges, as well as the other items set forth in Finding 7; that on or before August 13, 1999, the complain- ants may file a statement indicating whether they believe that the Commission should, in its evaluation of the pending two assignments of error, conduct a further hearing on the upcoming information to be submitted by GTE. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
05/11/1999Comments on response of GTE North to entry on rehearing, filed on behalf of complainants by J. Gertz. (3 pgs.)3
04/30/1999Response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
04/16/1999Letter stating that United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and GTE have established September 22, 1999 at 12:01 a.m. as the in-service date for 2-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Millersburg and Wilmot exchange, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (2 pgs.)2
04/15/1999Entry ordering that the complainant's application for re- hearing is granted in part and denied in part; that GTE shall file the information delineated in Finding 8 by April 30, 1999; the complainants may file a response to this infor mation by May 11, 1999; that this case remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. (5 pgs.)5
04/14/1999Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS beteween GTE's Wilmon exchange on the one hand and GTE's Berlin and Sprint's Millersburg ex- changes on the other hand is September 22, 1999 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Ken- nedy. (1 pg.)1
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Petrucci, Gretchen