DIS - Case Record for 96-1415-TP-AEC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1415-TP-AEC

Case Title: AMERITECH OHIO/H. Q. BUSINESS
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: AEC-Application to revise or cancel a contract
Date Opened: 12/30/1996
Date Closed: 6/18/1998
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 13 of 13 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/18/1998Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.)7
06/11/1998AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
06/11/1998AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
06/01/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (7 pgs.)7
04/30/1998Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.)9
04/09/1998Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.)5
03/26/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.)7
03/16/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (30 pgs.)30
02/12/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Divison is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal in these cases pur- suant to the directions given in Finding 12; that Ameri- tech's motions seeking to extend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Finding 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings in this entry do not affect the sus- pension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.)10
02/25/1997Memo automatically approving the application as of 1/29/97; case shall remain open pending decision on protective order.1
12/30/1996Confidential portion of contract between Ameritech Ohio and H. Q. Business, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (11 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)11
12/30/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
12/30/1996In the matter of the redacted version of a contract for Ameritech Digital Transport Service between Ameritech Ohio and H. Q. Business Centers. (12 pgs.)12
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fenlon,Mary K.