DIS - Case Record for 96-0298-TP-ACE Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0298-TP-ACE

File a Public Comment
Case Title: SCHERERS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ACE-Application for a certificate
Date Opened: 3/26/1996
Date Closed: 3/3/1997
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 34 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/15/1999Letter stating that applicant has decided not to pursue this application, filed by P. Keinath. (1 pg.)1
01/14/1999Entry dismissing this case and closing it of record. (2 pgs.)2
01/11/1999Correspondence regarding the representation of Scherers, filed by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)2
11/24/1998Letter requesting that the company be given until Monday, December 14, 1998 in which to file a tariff, filed on be- half of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
11/18/1998Entry ordering that applicant should submit on or before November 27, 1998, a proposed complete tariff in this case or file a letter notifying the Commission of their inten- tion to proceed immediately in this matter, otherwise this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (AE) (1 pg.) (ISSUED 11/13/98)1
04/23/1997Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)5
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted in accor- dance with Finding 3; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findnigs 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the appli- cations for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. (7 pgs.)7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.8
03/04/1997Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.)14
03/03/1997Entry ordering that this case shall remain partially sus- pended for an indefinite period, pending tariff approval by the Commission. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
03/03/1997Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
02/28/1997Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
02/18/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)9
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel