Skip to main content

Case Record For:

95-0831-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CONNIE DENNIN/GTE NORTH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 9/8/1995
Date Closed: 12/21/1995
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 15 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/25/1996Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 2.3, 43rd sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (2 pgs.)2
09/24/1996Tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 5th sheet 27; Section 2, original sheet 15.3, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (3 pgs.)3
02/21/1996Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS (ELCP) between GTE's Catawba exchange and the South Vienna exchange of Ameritech is October 1, 1996, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)1
02/20/1996Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)2
12/21/1995Finding & Order approving the stiuplation filed on December 6, 1995 in its entirety; that GTE institute measured-rate EAS from the Catawba exchange to the South Vienna exchange and that Ameritech institute measured-rate EAS from the South Vienna exchange to the Catawba exchange as soon as practicable and, in any event, within 12 months from the date of this Finding & Order. (5 pgs.)5
12/06/1995Stipulation, Agreement and Recommendation filed on behalf of applicant by C. Dennin, J. Stewart, C. Rawlings. (7 pgs.)7
11/15/1995Entry granting GTE's November 2, 1995 motion and, as a result, the cost and revenue data filing requirements imposed on both respondents within the September 20, 1995 entry are waived; that such waiver is granted sub- ject to the parties' expected filing of, and pending the Commission's subsequent consideration and disposition of, a stipulation which all the parties believe will resolve the issues presented in this matter; that, if, for some reason, such stipulation is not filed, or is filed but does not subsequently receive Commission approval, the Commission may, at that time, take appropriate action to reimpose on the respondents a requirement that they should prepare and submit cost data and revenue impact informa- tion. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
11/09/1995Memorandum in support of GTE's motion for waiver filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
11/02/1995Motion for waiver of filing costs filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (2 pgs.)2
10/24/1995Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (13 pgs.) (FILED 10/20/95)13
10/20/1995Answer of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
10/20/1995Information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (20 pgs.)20
10/20/1995Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (2 pgs.)2
09/20/1995Entry ordering that GTE and Ameritech shall file their answers with the Commission and serve copies upon the spokesperson for the complainants by 10/20/95; that GTE and Ameritech shall provide the information required by Finding 3 by 10/20/95; that GTE and Ameritech shall pro- vide the information required by Finding 4 by 11/19/95; scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on 10/31/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (6 pgs.)6
09/08/1995In the matter of the petition of Connie Dennin and subscrib- ers of the Catawba 828 exchange of GTE North to extend area service into the 568 South Vienna exchange. (9 pgs.)9
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Sheets, Kerry