Skip to main content

Case Record For:

91-0562-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: D. HARTZLER VS UNITED TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 3/25/1991
Date Closed: 10/29/1992
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 23 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/31/1993Tariff sheets which were omitted from the filing dated March 8, 1993, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet - 1; Section C - 11th sheet 25, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by J. Ludenia.0
03/08/1993Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet - 1; Prefact - 7th sheet 1; Section C - 14th sheet 12, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by J. Ludenia.0
02/04/1993Letter stating that the proposed implementation date for two-way nonoptional flat-rate extended area service between Holmesville and Wooster is March 4, 1993, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by J. Ludenia.0
11/25/1992Entry ordering that the statements contained in the October 29, 1992 supplemental opinion and order, to the effect that United had failed timely to respond to the submitted canvass ballots are factually incorrect and are stricken from the record; that, in all other respects, the Commission's October 29, 1992 supplemental opinion and order shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.0
11/04/1992Information response and motion for nunc pro tunc entry filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by T. Jacobs.0
10/29/1992Supplemental Opinion and Order granting two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between Holmesville and Wooster exchanges.0
10/02/1992Ballots filed on behalf of complainant by D. Hartzler.0
08/06/1992Supplemental Opinion & Order granting the request for two- way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Holmesville and Wooster exchanges contingent upon the filing of a canvass of the Holmesville subscribers.0
06/19/1992Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by T. Jacobs.0
04/23/1992Opinion and Order denying request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between United's Holmesville exchange and each of the Apple Creek and Shreve exchanges. The Commis- sion will make no determination at this time regardiing the request for EAS between the Holmesville and Wooster ex- changes pending receipt of additional cost information.0
09/09/1991Transcript filed for hearing held 8/20/91, (DF), 99 pgs., Submitted.0
08/15/1991Supplemental information response of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio, filed by T. Jacobs.0
08/08/1991Proof of Publication filed. (Holmes County)0
08/06/1991Proof of Publication filed. (Wayne County)0
08/06/1991Proof of Publication filed. (Wayne County)0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel