Skip to main content

Case Record For:

89-1301-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: D. HUDDLESTUN ET AL V GTE- ET AL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 8/29/1989
Date Closed: 6/20/1991
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 39 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/28/1993Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Contents - 39th sheet 1; Check List - 308th sheet 1, 80th sheet 6; Section 3-Kilbourne - 8th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy.0
05/24/1993P.U.C.O NO. 1 exchange services section 5 15th revised sheet No. 8 cancels 14th revised sheet No. 8 filed on behalf of Ohio Bell By A. Krekel.0
01/06/1992Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between Kilbourne and Columbus and one-way flat-rate from Kilbourne to Sunbury is June 1, 1993, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy.0
12/17/1991Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory.0
10/16/1991Letter stating that the proposed implementation date for one-way nonoptional extended area service from Kilbourne to Sunbury is June 1, 1993, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by J. Ludenia.0
06/20/1991Supplemental Opinion & Order granting the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS.0
06/14/1991Letter stating that respondent, Ohio Bell, will not require a hearing on the canvass, filed by A. Sedory.0
06/13/1991Letter stating that United Telephone Company of Ohio concurs with GTE North's review of the balloting and does not desire a further hearing in this matter, filed by T. Jacobs.0
06/03/1991GTE's review of the balloting results filed by B. Kazee.0
05/06/1991Ballots filed on behalf of various consumers.0
04/30/1991Ballots filed.0
04/25/1991Entry denying GTE's and Ohio Bell's application for rehearing.0
04/08/1991Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory.0
03/27/1991Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.0
03/07/1991Opinion & Order granting the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Kilbourne Exchange and the Columbus and Sunbury exchanges, contingent upon the conduct and filing of a canvass which shows that a substantial majority of the Kilbourne exchange subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service; ordering that GTE supply to the complainants within 15 days of the date of this Opinion & Order a complete list of the names and addresses of all Kilbourne exchange subscribers, excluding or specifically identifying the telephone company's pay stations, telephone numbers, and all special billing numbers; that complainants conduct a canvass of the Kilbourne exchange subscribers with the results and all collected ballots to be filed with the Commission by May 14, 1991; that GTE, Ohio Bell, and United shall review the ballots and notify the Commission of their positions on the final tally and on whether they desire a further hearing on the canvass by June 14, 1991.0
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel