Skip to main content

Case Record For:

86-0584-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: E. RILEY AND D. NEFF UNITED TEL/OBT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 4/11/1986
Date Closed: 4/27/1988
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 32 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
12/13/1989Tariff sheets PUCO No. 6 filed on behalf of United Telephone by J. Ludenia.0
10/26/1989Proposed implementation date is December 16, 1989 filed on behalf of United Telephone by J. Ludenia.0
06/27/1989Information Response of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by A. Sedory.0
04/27/1988Supplemental Opinion & Order issued ordering that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate extended area service between the Crooksville Exchange and the Zanesville and New Lexington Exchanges is denied; Ordering that United and Ohio Bell institute one-way, nonoptional Extended Local Calling from the Crooksville Exchange to the Zanesville and New Lexington Exchanges within two years of the date of this Supplemental Opinion & Order; Ordering that United and Ohio Bell establish an in-service date within eighteen months of the date of this Supplemental Opinion & Order.0
09/14/1987Letter filed by R. Goodman and E. Riley on behalf of complainants, informing the Commission that they do not seek a further hearing with regard to costs and would respectfully request the Commission to issue its final Opinion & Order granting two-way non-optional extended area service.0
09/01/1987Information Response of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by J. Rozic.0
08/28/1987Information Response of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by A. Sedory.0
06/30/1987Opinion and Order denying the request for two-way, non- optional, flat-rate EAS between Croodsville Exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio and the Roseville Exchange of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company and that the Commission will make no determination at this time regarding the requested EAS between the Crooksville Exchange of United and the Zanesville and New Lexington Exchanges of Ohio Bell pending the receipt of additional information and within 60 days of this order, United and Ohio Bell shall provide information required as discussed above.0
11/03/1986Letter filed by R. Goodman on behalf of complainant's, informing the Commission that they are unable to accept the proposed stipulation presented by Ohio Bell and United Telephone Co.0
10/29/1986Trans., for hearing held 10/7/86, (RF) Submitted - Local Public Hearing/Crooksville, Ohio Vol. I, 1-176 pages.0
10/27/1986Letter filed by R. Goodman on behalf of complainants, Re- lative to requesting extension of time until 10/29/86 to notify the Commission in writing as to complainants' acceptance of the proposed stipulation by Ohio Bell and United.0
10/01/1986Testimony of David L. Schiska filed by A. Sedory on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company.0
09/24/1986Letter filed by R. Goodman, Relative to the spokespersons have retained him as counsel.0
09/24/1986Testimony of Dennis R. McNary on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio, filed by J. Rozic.a0
09/17/1986Proof of Publication filed. (County/Morgan)0
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Marvin,Robert