DIS - Case Record for 85-0507-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

85-0507-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: LOUISE LOVETT/UNITED-GEN-OHIO BELL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 4/22/1985
Date Closed: 5/6/1986
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 19 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/23/1988Tariff sheets, PUCO NO. 6, filed by M. Askins on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio.0
03/21/1988Tariff sheets, PUCO No. 5, filed by L. H. Soeder on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company.0
11/03/1987Letter filed by M. Askins on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio, RE: company will be instituting extended area services between Windham and GTE-MTO's Garrettsville Exchange effective 3/26/88.0
02/19/1987Supplemental Information Response filed on behalf of General Telephone Company of Ohio by B. Kazee.0
01/27/1987Information response of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by A. Sedory.0
09/19/1986Copy of Motion of United States for an order to allow establishment of EAS Service between the Wadsworth and Rittman Exchanges and between the Windham and Garretsville Exchanges in Civil Action No. 83-1298 filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia filed by B. Kazee on behalf of General Telephone Company of Ohio.0
08/15/1986Letter to Nancy C. Garrison, U. S. Department of Justice from Ameritech concerning Civil Action 82-0192 in the U. S. District Court with attachments.0
05/06/1986Supplemental Opinion & Order granting EAS between the Wind- ham Exchange and the Ravenna & Garrettsville Exchanges.0
04/23/1986Ohio Bell will stipulate to a 74.83% affirmative vote with respect to the Windham Exchange filed by A. Sadori.0
04/17/1986Letter filed by C. Klepper, on behalf of the General Telephone Company of Ohio, Relative to General Telephone will stipulate with the findings of United Telephone Company with respect to the Windham canvass, General will not require a hearing on the canvass results.0
04/15/1986Letter filed by J. Rozic, Relative to the company's reveiw of the ballots they do not deem it necessary to have a hearing concerning the canvass results, on behalf of the United Telephone Company of Ohio.0
03/05/1986Ballots filed by L. Lovett.0
12/31/1985OPINION AND ORDER STATING THAT THE REQUEST FOR EAS BETWEEN WINDHAM AND WARREN EXCHANGES BE DENIED. THE REQUEST FOR EAS BETWEEN THE WINDHAM EXCHANGE AND THE RAVENNA AND GARRETTS- VILLE EXCHANGES BE GRANTED, CONDITIONED UPON A CANVASS. (SIGNED 12/30/85).0
10/30/1985Exception to AE report.0
10/10/1985Attorney examiner report filed.0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fergus,Ronda