Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
11/28/2022 | Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel of Record electronically filed by Mr. Matthew R. Pritchard on behalf of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC - Columbus, OH. | 4 |
01/16/2020 | Notice of withdrawal of Colleen Mooney electronically filed by Colleen L Mooney on behalf of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy. | 10 |
10/04/2019 | Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel of Record electronically filed by Mr. Matthew R. Pritchard on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio. | 2 |
01/15/2019 | Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel of Record electronically filed by Mr. Frank P Darr on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio. | 2 |
03/28/2014 | Notice of withdrawal of Joseph E. Oliker filed by F. Darr on behalf of McNees, Wallace & Nurick LLC. | 4 |
10/30/2012 | Motion and memorandum in support for renewal of protective order electronically filed by Mr. Yazen Alami on behalf of Ohio Power Company. | 6 |
12/01/2011 | Request for an extension of time to focus on this case alone 10-268-EL-FAC et al electronically filed by Mr. Matthew J. Satterwhite on behalf of American Electric Power Service Corporation. | 2 |
10/25/2011 | Service Notice | 2 |
10/25/2011 | Entry ordering that the motion to amend the procedural schedule be granted, as set forth in finding 5. (GS) | 3 |
10/13/2011 | Joint Motion and memorandum in support of the Parties for an Amendment to the Procedural Schedule and Request for Expedited Treatment electronically filed by Mr. Matthew J Satterwhite on behalf of American Electric Power Service Corporation. | 4 |
08/18/2011 | Service notice. | 2 |
08/18/2011 | Entry ordering that the OPAE's motion to intervene be granted in accordance with finding 5 and the motion to amend the procedural schedule be granted, as set forth in finding 7. (GS) | 3 |
08/08/2011 | Joint motion and memorandum in support of the parties for an amendment to the procedural schedule filed by M. Satterwhite on behalf of American Electric Power. | 3 |
06/16/2011 | Entry ordering that the motion for protective treatment filed by Companies be granted in accordance with finding (9); motions to intervene filed by OCC, the OMAEG, and IEU-Ohio be granted in accordance to finding (15) and that the procedural schedule set forth in finding (16) be adopted. (JRJ) | 5 |
06/16/2011 | Service Notice | 2 |