DIS - Case Record for 08-0846-EL-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:


Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 7/1/2008
Date Closed: 9/23/2014
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 50 documents 1 /  4 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/23/2014Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO2
07/17/2013Service Notice1
11/15/2012Supreme Court Document . The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/. Slip Opinion - Affirming PUCO order - Cite as In re Complaint of Reynoldsburg, No. 2012-Ohio-5270. electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio30
04/06/2012Notice of withdrawal of counsel and substitution of counsel, Mark Yurick from the law firm of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, formerly Chester, Wilcox & Saxbe, LLP filed by M. Yurick.2
08/25/2011Service Notice3
08/25/2011Supreme Court No. 11-1274 Transmittal papers.7
07/27/2011Notice of appeal of appellant City of Reynoldsburg, Ohio SC # 11-1274 filed by M. Yurick.6
06/01/2011Service Notice3
06/01/2011Entry on Rehearing ordered that Reynoldsburg's application for rehearing be denied in accordance with Findings (8), (11), (14), (17), and (20); also a Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Cheryl L. Roberto, Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Paul A. Centolella and Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Andre T. Porter.16
05/13/2011Columbus Southern Power Company's memorandum contra application for rehearing filed by M. Satterwhite on behalf of the City of Reynoldsburg.11
05/04/2011Application for rehearing of The City of Reynoldsburg filed by J. Bentine18
04/05/2011Service notice.3
04/05/2011Opinion and order that Reynoldsburg's allegation that paragraph 17 of CSP's tariff is unjust, unreasonable, or unlawful is denied; CSP's motion to strike limited portions of Reynoldsburg's reply brief is granted; Reynoldsburg's motion to accept corrected citations in its initial brief is granted in part and denied in part; Reynoldsburg's motion for oral argument is denied. 36
03/05/2010Reply memorandum in support of Reynoldsburg's motion for oral argument filed by M. Yurick on behalf of the City of Reynoldsburg.5
03/01/2010Memorandum contra Reynoldsburg's motion for oral argument electronically filed by Mr. Matthew J Satterwhite on behalf of Columbus Southern Power Company.5
1 /  4 
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Agranoff, Jay