Skip to main content

Case Record For:

05-0889-TP-ZTA

File a Public Comment
Case Title: MCI WORLDCOM COMMUNICATIONS
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ZTA-Introduction of new tariffed services
Date Opened: 7/12/2005
Date Closed: 6/28/2006
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 21 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
07/27/2006Revised price list tariff sheet filed on behalf of MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services by B. Royer.2
07/11/2006Revised tariff sheet of MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services (MCI) for PUCO Tariff No.2 filed by S. Brown.2
06/28/2006Entry ordering that OCC's rehearing application is granted on limited basis as described in finding (5) but in all other respects is denied; that all rehearing arguments not specifically addressed are denied.7
06/28/2006Service Notice2
06/19/2006Memorandum contra application for rehearing of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by B. Royer on behalf of MCImetro Transmission Access Services LLC, dba Verizon Business Services and MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services.8
06/09/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.18
05/15/2006New tariff provisions of MCI Communications Services, Inc. for PUCO Tariff No. 2 according to the Finding and Order of May 10, 2006 requested by the Commission, filed by B. Royer.8
05/10/2006Finding and Order ordering that OCC's Motion to Intervene be denied; that because the Commission finds that no need exists for granting any except one of the waiver requests MCI originally submitted in this case, those requests will neither be granted nor denied. MCI's request for waiver of the customer notice requirements set out in Rule 4901:1-6-17, O.A.C., is necessary and, for the reason set out in finding (11)(c) of this finding and order, is granted; that MCI's tariff applications filed on July 12, 2005 in Case Nos. 05-888-TP-ZTA and 05-889-TP-ZTA, as later amended on August 29, 2005, January 24, 2006, and April 28, 2006, are approved; that these two cases be closed of record.15
05/10/2006Service Notice1
04/28/2006Revised tariff page PUCO No.2 filed by B. Royer on behalf of MCI Communications Services, Inc.4
01/24/2006Revised tariff sheets 85, 85.1, 86.1, 86.2, 86.3, 86.3.1 and 86.3.1.1, of PUCO Tariff No. 2, which should be substituted for the same sheets filed with application on July 12, 2005, filed on behalf of MCI Communications Services by J. Sanders.8
09/08/2005Reply to MCI's memorandum contra and response to objections filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.8
08/29/2005Fourth Revised Sheet No. 86.1, PUCO No. 2, to be filed for same sheet filed with application on July 12, 2005, and enclosed Exhibit C that was inadvertently omitted from the application, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Sanders.3
08/29/2005Memorandum contra the motion for leave to intervene of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and response to objections, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.6
08/11/2005Motion to intervene and objections to applications, memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf of the Office of Consumers' Counsel.14
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel