Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
01/15/2004 | Service Notice. | 2 |
01/14/2004 | Entry ordering that the conforming language interconnection agreement submitted by the parties on December 31, 2003, be approved and accepted as if timely filed, that case is closed of record. | 2 |
12/31/2003 | Conforming language interconnection agreement with attachments, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon and Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers. | 64 |
12/22/2003 | Letter to Commission regarding interconnection agreement, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon and Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers. | 2 |
12/15/2003 | Entry ordering that the extension requested by Verizon and SBC on 12/3/2003 be granted and that each party file comments relating to these portions of the proposed interconnection agreement no later than 12/22/2003, and Verizon and SBC and any other interested party file responses no later than 12/29/2003. | 3 |
12/10/2003 | Verizon Wireless's version of the language to be used in the Commission approved interconnection agreement filed on behalf of applicant by T. Rodgers. | 120 |
12/10/2003 | Letter notifying Commission that all parties are working towards conforming contract language, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon. | 51 |
12/10/2003 | Pursuant to the Commission's Arbitration Award adopted 11/13/2003, the parties have worked diligently towards conforming contract language. Two unresolved sections are included in the appendix Wireless Collocation Verizon Wireless, an amendment is also attached filed on behalf of applicant filed by M. Fenlon. | 51 |
12/03/2003 | Request for an extension of time, until 12/10/2003, in which to file the conforming interconnection agreement by M. Fenlon and T. Rodgers. | 2 |
11/13/2003 | Arbitration award ordered that SBC's motion to strike the affidavit of Mr. Clampitt, and the discussion of that affidavit, from Verizon's reply brief in this matter is granted, that SBC motion to strike from Verizon's reply brief the discussion of Verizon offer purportedly made during negotiations between the parties be granted, that the parties incorporate the directives set forth in this arbitration award within their interconnection agreement, that within 20 days of the arbitration award, SBC and Verizon shall file their entire interconnection agreement for review by the Commission, that within ten days of the filing of the interconnection agreement, any party or other interested persons may file written comments supporting or opposing the proposed interconnection agreement and that any party or other interested person may file its response to comments within five days thereafter, that this docket shall remain open until further order of the Commission. | 15 |
10/27/2003 | Memorandum in support of motion to strike filed on behalf of SBC by M. Fenlon. | 4 |
10/23/2003 | Memorandum contra to SBC Ohio's motion to strike, filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers. | 5 |
10/17/2003 | Motion to strike filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon. | 5 |
10/10/2003 | Post hearing reply brief filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon. | 14 |
10/10/2003 | Post-hearing reply brief of Verizon Wireless filed by T.Rodgers. | 28 |