Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-0563-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK COMPETITIVE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 5/6/1999
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
02/23/2007Reply comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC filed by D. Hart.12
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. filed by V. Norris.5
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.8
02/23/2007Reply comments of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. filed by K. Hobbs.7
02/23/2007Reply comments on behalf of One Communications filed by R. Price. (FAX)11
01/18/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Rodgers on behalf of XO Communications Services, Inc.2
01/16/2007Motion for extension of time to file reply comments and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.5
01/11/2007Certificate of service filed by P. Rupich on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC.2
01/08/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.3
01/08/2007Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC dba Verizon Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance and NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions (collectively "Verizon").3
01/08/2007Initial comments of One Communications filed by R. Price.14
01/05/2007Initial comments of the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC, filed by P. Rupich.12
01/05/2007Comments filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Flahive.21
01/05/2007Initial comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association by C. Flahive and T. Lodge.15
01/04/2007Initial comments of XO Communications Services, Inc. filed by T. Rodgers.21
11/22/2006Service Notice40
11/21/2006Entry ordering that all interested persons and entities are hereby authorized to file initial and/or reply comments in accordance with finding (5); that an informational conference be scheduled on November 30, 2006 at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad St, Hearing room 11-E, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793, to begin immediately following the conference scheduled in 06-1345-TP-ORD; that the pending applications for rehearing are moot; that case nos. 99-998-TP-COI and 99-563-TP-COI are be closed.49
01/10/2005Memo requesting that all case numbers listed be attached to the Entry dated April 1, 2003 in case numbers 99-998-TP-COI and 99-563-TP-COI filed by J. Agranoff.9
09/10/2004Revised tariff PUCO No.2 filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Any Distance by K. Reid.10
05/12/2003Reply to memorandum contra of SBC Ohio and memorandum in response of The Ohio Telecom Association, filed on behalf of Level 3 Communications by D. Turano.5
05/02/2003Memorandum contra Level 3's motion to intervene and SBC's Ohio's response to proferred comments, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.9
05/01/2003Memorandum in response to motion of Level 3 Communications to intervene and submit statement in support, filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.7
04/14/2003Motion to intervene and submit statement in support of application of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. for rehearing filed by D. Turano.12
04/10/2003Entry ordered that the applications for rehearing are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.11
04/01/2003Entry ordering that the effective date of Chapter 4901-1-6 will be April 7, 2003; that the provisions of Rule 4901:1-6-23(C) addressing secured inmate facilities are suspended sua sponte in accordance with Finding 3; that SBC Ohio and Sprint/United comply with Finding 3; that all entities operating as switchless rebillers must comply with Finding 4; that the Docketing Division close all CT-RRJ applications on July 3, 2003, in accordance with Finding 4.7
04/01/2003Service Notice.101
03/27/2003Reply to applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Mulcahy.24
03/27/2003Memorandum in response to applications for rehearing on carrier-to-carrier rules, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.13
03/27/2003Memorandum contra to applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart.8
03/27/2003Memorandum contra filed on behalf of joint CLECs, AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris; WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders; CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield; and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield.27
03/27/2003Memorandum in opposition to joint CLECs' application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by P. Rupich.13
03/27/2003Memorandum in response to joint application for rehearing and request for clarification filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Assoc. by C. Flahive.7
03/17/2003Joint CLECS' application for rehearing and request for clarification filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris and Worldcom, Inc., by J. Sanders.41
03/17/2003Application for rehearing and Clarification filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., and Verizon Select Services, Inc. by T. Lodge.30
03/17/2003Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart.8
03/17/2003Application for rehearing filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.34
03/17/2003Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.14
03/17/2003Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by P. Rupich.16
03/06/2003Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing; that clarification as set forth in this entry on rehearing is warranted.3
03/06/2003Service Notice19
02/18/2003Request for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by D. Stinson.9
02/18/2003Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.10
02/13/2003Entry ordering that the application for rehearing is granted, revised rule (Appendix A) is adopted, and that copies of the revised rule be refiled with the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, the Legislative Service Commission, and the Secretary of State, it is further ordered, that, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the review date for the revised rule shall be May 31, 2007.46
02/13/2003Opinion & Order adopting the carrier-to-carrier rules into Chapter 4901:1-6-O.A.C. as set forth in Appendix A to this order; that such rules will become effective when codified into the Ohio Administrative Code. 93
02/10/2003Application for further clarification or further rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Assoc. by T. Lodge.7
01/16/2003Second entry on rehearing granting the applications for rehearing filed on Dec. 20, and Dec. 23, 2002, and denying in part; that the attached revised rules (Appendix A) for Chapter 4901:1-6 are modified and are hereby adopted; ordered that the review date for Chapter 4901:1-6 shall be May 31, 2007.66
01/16/2003Service Notice19
01/06/2003Memorandum Contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf of The Office of Consumers Counsel by D. Bergmann.17
01/06/2003Memorandum Contra of applications for rehearing filed on behalf of AARP, Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, City of Toledo, and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed by W. Gruber.9
01/06/2003Memorandum Contra to application for rehearing to the Payphone Association of Ohio filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba/Sprint by J. Stewart.5
01/02/2003Memorandum Contra SBC Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by P. Rupich.13
01/02/2003Service Notice19
12/31/2002Entry ordering that an expedited ruling and the requested extensions of time are granted in both 563/998 and 1310 in accordance with Finding 3. (JJ)2
12/30/2002Motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint for extension of time and memorandum in support, filed by J. Stewart.4
12/27/2002SBC Ameritech Ohio' s memorandum contra the Payphone Association of Ohio's application for rehearing filed by W. Adams.9
12/23/2002Application for rehearing and clarification of Verizon North Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc., memorandum in support, filed by T. Lodge.10
12/23/2002Application for rehearing or clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of SBC Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.24
12/23/2002Application for clarification or rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.13
12/23/2002Application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company memorandum in support, filed by D. Hart.13
12/20/2002Application for rehearing of the Payphone Association of Ohio, memorandum in support, filed by W. Newcomb.10
11/21/2002Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing are granted in part and denied in part as outlined in this entry; that the Commission is the ultimate arbiter of the meaning of these rules; that the attached proposed rules are hereby adopted; that the adopted rules be effective on the earliest day permitted by law; unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the review date for Chapter 4901-1-6 shall be May 31, 2007.130
11/21/2002Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing are granted in part and denied in part as outlined in this entry; that the Commission is the ultimate arbiter of the meaning of these rules; that the attached proposed rules are hereby adopted; that the adopted rules be effective on the earliest day permitted by law; unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the review date for Chapter 4901-1-6 shall be May 31, 2007.106
07/03/2002Change of attorney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.1
01/31/2002Service Notice27
01/31/2002Entry on rehearing granting the applications for rehearing for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
01/17/2002Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and E. Siegel.12
01/17/2002Memorandum contra certain applications for rehearing of Consumer Parties, OTA, Ameritech, CBT, Sprint and Verizon, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.15
01/17/2002Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.51
01/17/2002Memorandum in response to the application for rehearing of OCC, filed on behalf of Verizon North and Verizon Select Services by T. Lodge.8
01/17/2002Memorandum in response to applications for rehearing of OCC, AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio, WorldCom, Inc., and XO Ohio filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Assoc. by T. Lodge.9
01/17/2002Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; AARP by W. Gruber; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Communities United for Action by N. Morgan; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by W. Gruber; Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner; City of Columbus by J. Klein; and City of Toledo by K. Bruce.19
01/14/2002Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in response to application for rehearing of the payphone association of Ohio, filed by T. Lodge.6
01/14/2002Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra the PAO's application for rehearing, filed by J. Kelly.8
01/11/2002Service Notice.27
01/10/2002Entry ordering that the workshop scheduled for January 16, 2002, is postponed; a subsequent entry will be issued rescheduling the workshop for a later date and time. (AE)1
01/07/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; AARP by W. Gruber; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Communities United for Action by N. Morgan; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by W. Gruber; Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner; City of Cleveland by W. Zigli; City of Columbus by J. Klein; and City of Toledo by K. Bruce.51
01/07/2002Application for rehearing filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.13
01/07/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Hart.13
01/07/2002OX Ohio Inc.'s application for rehearing filed by J. Bentine.8
01/07/2002Application for rehearing and clarification of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint filed by J. Stewart.7
01/07/2002Application for rehearing of WorldCom, Inc. filed by J. Sanders.14
01/07/2002Application for rehearing and clarification of Verizon North Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc. filed by T. Lodge.11
01/07/2002AT&T's application for rehearing and clarification of the Commission's opinion and order on 12/6/01, filed by D. Chorzempa.16
01/07/2002Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by J. Kelly.31
01/07/2002Application for rehearing and clarification of Verizon North Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc. filed by T. Lodge.12
01/04/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Payphone Assoc. of Ohio by S. Howard.10
12/07/2001Service Notice.25
12/06/2001Opinion and order adopting the new Chapter 4901:1-6, Ohio Administrative Code as set forth in Appendix A; copies are to be filed with the Joint Commission on Agency Rule Review, the Legislative Service Commission and the Secretary of State; that a workshop is scheduled for 1/16/02, 1:30 p.m., hearing room 11-A. The purpose of the workshop is limited to discussing the procedure by which necessary tariff modifications are made with the Commission.49
09/10/2001Transcript of public meeting held August 7, 2001, in Cleveland, Ohio, filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber.60
08/02/2001Transcript of public meeting held July 13, 2001, in Cleveland, Ohio, filed by the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber.124
08/01/2001Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Charles Peckham.1
07/02/2001Correspondence opposing request for rate increase filed by concerned consumer, S. Loving.1
07/02/2001Resolution No. 1101-01 filed on behalf of Cleveland City Council by W Gruber.2
06/11/2001Notice of substitution of counsel filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Cingular Wireless, LLC.6
05/29/2001Executive summary of reply comments and reply comments filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber.13
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; AARP by W. Gruber; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; Communities United For Action by N. Morgan; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner; City of Cleveland by W. Zigli; City of Columbus by J. Klein; and City of Toledo by K. Bruce.48
05/25/2001Reply comments to initial comments filed by interested parties to the staff's proposal, filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers.6
05/25/2001Joint reply comments of The Competitive Carriers Group; XO Ohio by J. Bentine; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by P. Sherwood; NuVox Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assoc. by S. Howard; AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn; CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien; Association of Communications Enterprises by S. Bloomfield; McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services by M. Christensen; Allegiance Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; Global Crossing Local Services and Global Crossing Telemanagement by S. Bloomfield; and LDMI Telecommunications by S. Bloomfield.96
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by M. Romito.24
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by C. Flahive.86
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of Verizon North and Verizon Select Services by C. Flahive.39
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.89
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of Cingular Wireless by J. Kelly.10
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of SBC Telecom by W. Adams.16
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, Sprint Communications Co., and Sprint Spectrum L.P. dba Sprint PCS by J. Stewart.15
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn and D. Chorzempa; and AT&T Wireless Services by J. Sanders.20
05/25/2001Reply comments and executive summary of reply comments filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber. (Fax copy)14
05/25/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of the Small Telephone Companies by C. Flahive.36
05/18/2001Reply comments filed on behalf of The Payphone of Ohio by J. Donovan.26
05/16/2001Service Notice.19
05/15/2001Entry granting an extension to file reply comments until 5/25/01; Empowerment Center's 5/4/01 is denied. (AE)2
05/09/2001Supplemental certificate of service filed on behalf of Suretel, Inc. by J. Kelroy.2
05/04/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of XO Ohio, Inc. by T. Rodgers.4
05/03/2001Service Notice.21
05/01/2001Entry ordering that each entity that filed initial comments in response to the Commission's March 1, 2001 entry in this docket ensure that a copy of those comments are served upon the other entities listed in Finding 4. (AE)5
04/30/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction by G. Trout.5
04/30/2001Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction by G. Trout.11
04/30/2001Price List Addendum; the purpose of this filing is to add pages 3 which was inadvertently omitted from the original filing for the price list which offers a promotion to new customers who sign up for one of the AnyTime plans during the promotion period one month of free service up to $200, filed on behalf of Broadwing Telecommunications by E. King.5
04/30/2001Supplemental certificate of service filed on behalf of DP&L by A. Vinolus.5
04/25/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart.5
04/24/2001Price List Addendum; the purpose of this filing is to revise its Resale Telecommunications Interexchange tariff PUCO No. 2 to introduce a promotion for residential customers which consists offering new customers who sign up for one of the AnyTime plans during the promotional period one month of free service up to $200.3
04/24/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by M. Romito.2
04/23/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of Suretel, Inc. by J. Kelroy.5
04/23/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Western Reserve Telephone Co. and Alltel Communications, Inc., The Small Telephone Companies, The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn., Verizon North and Verizon Select Services by C. Flahive.20
04/20/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of City Signal Communications by S. Howard.5
04/20/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of Competitive Carriers Group by B. Kahn.5
04/20/2001Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.5
04/20/2001Letter endorsing, adopting, and joining the comments filed jointly by OCC et al., filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Zigli.2
04/17/2001Entry ordering that each entity that filed initial comments in response to the Commission's March 1, 2001 entry in this docket serve a copy of those comments upon the other entities listed in Finding 2; that DRC's motion for an extension of time is granted in accordance with Finding 4. (AE)3
04/17/2001Letter endorsing, adopting, and joining the comments filed jointly by OCC et al., filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Zigli. (Fax copy)2
04/16/2001Comments of the Council of the City of Cleveland filed by M. Polensek and J. Westbrook. (FAX)3
04/16/2001Initial comments of Suretel, Inc. filed by J. Kelroy7
04/16/2001Comments of the Council of the City of Cleveland filed by M. Polensek and J. Westbrook. (Original copy)3
04/16/2001Comments of Alltel Ohio, Inc., the Western Reserve Telephone Company, and Alltel Communications, Inc., filed by T. Lodge.11
04/16/2001Initial comments of AT&T filed by B Kahn, D. Chorzempa, J. Argentieri26
04/16/2001Initial comments of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly.88
04/16/2001Comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, AARP, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Communities United for Action, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, the City of Columbus and the City of Toledo filed by D. Bergmann, W. Gruber, M. Smalz, N. Morgan, E. Jacobs, J. Meissner, J. Klein, K. Bruce.37
04/16/2001Additional comments of Verizon North Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc. filed by T. Lodge143
04/16/2001Updated comments of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association filed by T. Lodge57
04/16/2001Initial comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio d/b/a Sprint, Sprint Communications Company L.P. , and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS filed by J. Stewart51
04/16/2001Executive summary of comments and comments of AARP filed by W. Gruber35
04/16/2001Initial comments of Verizon Wireless to the staff's proposal filed by T. Rodgers.12
04/16/2001Initial comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by M. Romito.40
04/16/2001Initial comments of Cingular Wireless filed by J. Kelly8
04/16/2001Initial comments of Westside Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Cellnet of Ohio filed by R. Hart5
04/16/2001Initial comments of City Signal Communications, Inc. filed by S. Howard4
04/16/2001Initial comments of Enron Broadband filed by R. Hart6
04/16/2001Joint comments filed on behalf of The Competitive Carriers Group, ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; XO Communications of Ohio by J. Bentine; Global Crossings Local Services by S. Bloomfield; CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien; Nuvox Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by P. Sherwood; The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by S. Howard; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Allegiance Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; Association of Communications Enterprises by S. Bloomfield; MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders; McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services by M. Christensen; and LDMI Telecommunications by S. Bloomfield.116
04/16/2001Motion for extension of time to permit comment on proposed rule, filed on behalf of The Department of Rehabilitation and Correction by G. Trout.1
04/16/2001Initial comments filed on behalf of The Payphone Association of Ohio by H. Kelly.53
04/16/2001Notice of filing and certificate of service filed on behalf of The Payphone Association of Ohio by H. Kelly.6
04/16/2001Updated comments filed on behalf of The Small Telephone Companies by T. Lodge.29
04/13/2001Initial comments filed on behalf of the New Knoxville Telephone Co. by R. Hollister.31
04/13/2001Initial comments of the Dayton Power and Light Company filed by A. Vinolus4
04/06/2001Response to The Payphone Association of Ohio's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.8
03/22/2001Petition for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Payphone Association of Ohio by J. Donovan.11
03/22/2001Service Notice.12
03/19/2001Entry granting consumer parties' motion. (AE)2
03/16/2001Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra the motion for a continuance and the consolidation of the procedural schedules filed by J. Kelly.5
03/15/2001Letter in support of the motion filed by OCC seeking continuance and consolidation of the procedural schedules, filed on behalf of ICG Group by B. Ferris.1
03/12/2001Motion for a continuance, consolidation of the procedural schedules, and for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; Appalachian People's Action by M. Smalz; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.8
03/02/2001Entry scheduling a conference at 1:30 p.m. on March 12, 2001, Hearing Room 11-A, Commission offices. (AE)2
03/01/2001Entry ordering that all interested stakeholders are invited to file initial and reply comments to the Staff's proposal, which is attached to this entry, by April 16 and May 18, 2001, respectively.87
01/26/2001Tariff, PUCO N o. 2, original page 180, filed on behalf of Broadwing Telecommunication Inc. by K. Reid.2
11/27/2000Information regarding the meeting with David C. Bergmann and Karen J. Hardie of OCC and Commissioner Mason, Attorney Examiner Jones, Lou Pompi and Jill Kocher of the Commission staff, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.4
11/27/2000Summary and key points of discussion held on 11/20/00 filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.4
11/16/2000Application requesting authorization to revise its Intrastate Interexchange Toll Carrier Tariff PUCO No. 2, to introduce a new promotion under the name "Anytime 4000", filed on behalf of CBLD by D. Marshall.8
11/16/2000Price List Addendum; the purpose of this filing is to revise its tariff, PUCO No. 2, to introduce a new promotion under the name "Anytime 4000", filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance by D. Marshall.8
11/14/2000Information regarding the meeting with Chairman Schriber, Eric Stephens, David C. Bergmann and Karen J. Hardie, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.4
11/13/2000Agenda of meeting held 11/6/00 filed by M. Christensen on behalf of The New Knoxville Telephone Company.5
11/13/2000Summary and key points of the discussion held 11/9/00 filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.4
11/07/2000Letter regarding its meeting with several Commissioners and members of the Staff of the Commission on November 6, 2000, filed on behalf of The New Knoxville Telephone Co. by M. Christensen. (5 pgs.)5
11/06/2000Outlien of ex parte discussion between members of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. and Commissioner Mason and representatives of the Staff, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)3
11/06/2000Outline of Ex Parte discussion between members of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association and Commissioners filed by T. Lodge.3
10/31/2000Outline of ex parte discussion held 10/26/00 filed by T. McCullough on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio d/b/a Sprint.5
10/31/2000Outline of ex parte discussion between United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company and Commissioners, filed on behalf of Sprint by T. McCullough. (5 pgs.)5
10/30/2000Outline of EX Parte Discussion between Verizon North Inc. and Commissioners. Filed by T. Lodge (3 pgs)3
10/30/2000Outline of the ex parte discussion held 10/24/00 filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.3
10/26/2000Memorandum of ex parte presentation, filed on behalf of SBC Telecom by W. Adams. (5 pgs.)5
10/26/2000Updated information filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
10/25/2000Outline of ex parte discussion held 10/23/00 filed by T. Lodge on behalf of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association.3
10/25/2000Outline of ex parte discussion between Members of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association and the Commission, filed by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)3
10/23/2000Letter about discussion held 10/18/00 filed by D. Chorzempa on behalf of AT&T.1
10/20/2000Outline of ex parte discussion held 10/11/00 filed by T. Lodge on behalf of the Small Telephone Companies.6
10/20/2000Outline of ex parte discussion between the Small Telephone Companies and Commissioners Fergus, Mason, Schriber and Chief of Telephone Section Jones on October 11, 2000, filed by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
10/20/2000Outline of ex parte discussion between the Small Telephone Companies, Chairman Schriber and Chief of Telephone Section Jones on October 11, 2000, filed by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
10/11/2000Certificate of service filed by J. Harrison on behalf of the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company.2
10/11/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (2 pgs.)2
10/10/2000Certificate of service filed by R. Donahue on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio d/b/a Sprint.1
10/06/2000Certificate of Service. Filed by R. Donahue (1 pg)1
10/06/2000Certificate of Service of Southern Ohio Communications Services, Inc. Filed by M. Christensen (3 pgs)3
10/04/2000Duplicate Entry ordering each person who recently filed initial comments in this docket shall serve a copy of those comments on the persons listed in the attached appendix; that all interested persons refrain from submitting reply comments at this time. 4
10/04/2000Cincinnati Bell Telephone's comments filed by M. Romito.17
10/04/2000Entry ordering each person who recently filed initial comments in this docket shall serve a copy of those comments on the persons listed in the attached appendix; that all interested persons refrain from submitting reply comments at this time.4
10/04/2000delete no view button Entry ordering that each person who recently filed initial comments in this docket shall serve a copy of those comments on the persons listed in the attached appendix; that all interested persons refrain from submitting reply comments at this time. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
10/02/2000Comments filed on behalf of Broadband Office Communications, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
10/02/2000Initial comments of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association filed by T. Lodge (35 pgs)35
10/02/2000Intial comments of Alltel and Western Reserve Telephone filed by T. Lodge (10 pgs)10
10/02/2000Initial comments of small telephone companies filed by T. Lodge (24 pgs)24
10/02/2000Initial comments of Verizon filed by T. Lodge (24 pgs)24
10/02/2000Initial comments of SBC Telecom filed by W. Adams (13 pgs)13
10/02/2000Comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann (84 pgs)84
10/02/2000Joint comments of the competitive carriers filed by B.Ferris T. Rodgers, T. O'Brien, S. Bloomfield, S. Howard, B. Kahn, J. Sanders and M. Christensen. (72 pgs)72
10/02/2000Initial comments filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech Ohio (92 pgs)92
10/02/2000Notice of Suretel, Inc. reserving the right to file reply comments filed by J. Kelroy. (3 pgs)3
10/02/2000Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone filed by M. Romito (17 pgs)17
10/02/2000Comments of Broadband Office Communications filed by s. Bloomfield (1 pg)1
10/02/2000Notice of Suretel, Inc. dba Sure-Tel, Inc. reserving the right to file reply comments filed by J. Kelroy.3
09/22/2000Entry ordering that the procedure by which the Commission will ultimately issue final rules in this matter is clari- fied in accordance with Finding 4. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
09/15/2000Correspondence letter raising certain process concerns which must be clarified before initial comments are filed regard- ing the Staff's preliminary proposal for comprehensive tele- communications rule reform and preliminary proposal for an elective alternative regulation plan, filed on behalf of the Competitive Carriers Group (CCG) an ad hoc coalition of com- petitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), and the OCC by J. Sanders. (3 pgs.) 3
09/15/2000Correspondence to raise, early on in this combined rulemaking proceeding, certain process concerns which must be clarified before initial comments are filed regarding the Staffs Preliminary Proposal for Comprehensive Telecommunications Rule Reform and Preliminary Proposal for An Elective Alternative Regulation Plan filed by CCG and OCC.3
09/15/2000Correspondence letter raising certain process concerns which must be clarified before initial comments are filed regard- ing the Staff's preliminary p roposal for comprehensive telecommunications rule reform and preliminary proposal for an elective alternative regulation plan, filed on behalf of the Competitive Carriers Group (CCG) an ad hoc coalition of competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), and the OCC by J. Sanders. (3 pgs.)3
09/08/2000Entry granting in part and denying in part OCC's motion for extension of time; initial comments should be filed on or before 10/2/00; reply comments no later than 10/20/00. (JA) (2 pgs)2
09/07/2000Memorandum in opposition to OCC's motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Ind. Assoc. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
09/07/2000Memorandum of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association in opposition to OCC's motion for extension of time filed by T. Lodge.3
09/06/2000Memorandum contra OCC's motion for extension of time filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.7
09/06/2000Rhythms Link Inc., Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. and Mcleodusa Telecommunications Services, Inc. adoption of motion of extension of time filed by Ohio Consumers' Counsel Respectfully submitted bu, S. Bloomfield (3 pgs)3
09/06/2000Ameritech Ohio's Memmorandum Contra OCC's Motion for extension of time. Filed by J. Kelly (6 pgs)4
09/06/2000Rhythms Link Inc., Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. and McLeod Telecommunications Services, Inc. adoption of motion of extension of time filed by Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by S. Bloomfield.5
09/06/2000Memorandum contra OCC's motion for extension of time filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech Ohio.5
08/31/2000Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (6 pgs.)6
08/24/2000Entry ordering that all interested stakeholders are invited to file initial and reply comments to the staff's proposal, which is attached to this entry, by September 18 and October 6, 2000, respectively; that the ex parte process set forth herein is adopted for purposes of this proceeding; schedul- ing a conference from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on August 31, 2000, at the Commission offices in order to allow interested persons to ask the staff questions to gain a better under- standing of the staff's proposal and rationale. (69 pgs.)69
08/24/2000Entry ordered that all interested stakeholders are invited to file initial and reply comments to the Staff's proposal, which is attached to this Entry, by September 18, and October 6, 2000 respectively.69
08/24/2000Entry ordering that a conference be held from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on August 31, 2000, at the offices of the Commission, 11th floor 180 E. Broad St. Columbus, Oh.74
05/11/2000Finding and order, ordering that in the interim and while the Commission revaluates the entire regulatory telecommunications framework, telecommunications carriers be afford the flexible regulatory treatment as discussed.22
12/22/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North, GTE Wireless, and GTE Communications Corp. by J. Miggans. (3 pgs.)3
12/22/1999 Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North, GTE Wireless, and GTE Communications Corp. by J. Miggans 3
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (8 pgs.)8
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (8 pgs.)8
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated; GTE Wireless Incorporated; and GTE Communications Corpora- tion by S. Halteman. (7 pgs.)7
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio, Inc. by J. Small. (5 pgs.)5
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Alltel Communications, Inc.; Alltel Ohio, Inc.; and Western Reserve Telephone Company by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
12/21/1999 Reply comments filed on behalf of Alltel Communications, Inc.; Alltel Ohio, Inc.; and Western Reserve Telephone Company by T. Lodge 5
12/21/1999 Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated; GTE Wireless Incorporated; and GTE Communications Corporation by S. Halteman 7
12/21/1999Reply comments of Nextlink Ohio, Inc. filed by J. Small.5
12/21/1999Reply comments of Ameritech filed by J. Kelly.47
12/21/1999Reply comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart and L. Lauridsen.8
12/21/1999Reply comments of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge.8
12/21/1999Reply comments to Commission's October 28, 1999 Entry, filed by AT&T by D. Chorzempa.10
12/21/1999Reply comments of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by T. Etter.14
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (47 pgs.)47
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (14 pgs.)14
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom Communica- tions by J. Sanders and B. Royer. (11 pgs.)11
12/21/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (10 pgs.)10
12/20/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Re- sellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (9 pgs.)9
12/09/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. (2 pgs.)2
12/08/1999Certificate of service and copy of initial comments filed on behalf of GTE North, GTE Wireless, and GTE Communications Corp. by S. Halteman. (17 pgs.)17
12/07/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company and the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (2 pgs.)2
12/06/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Virtual Business Communications by M. Christensen. (4 pgs.)4
12/06/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (2 pgs.)2
12/06/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by M. Christensen. (3 pgs.)3
12/03/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)2
12/03/1999Entry ordering that each entity that filed comments in response to the Commission's October 28, 1999 entry in this docket shall serve a copy of those comments upon the other entities listed in Finding 2. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
12/01/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone Co. by D. Marshall. (8 pgs.)8
12/01/1999Letter stating that the name of Counsel for Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LP was inadvertently omitted in the filing submitted on November 30, 1999 filed by B. Ferris.1
12/01/1999 Addition to comments filed by ICG Telecom Group and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, filed by B. Ferris. 1
12/01/1999Initial comments of the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, filed by D. Marshall.8
12/01/1999Addition to comments filed by ICG Telecom Group and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, filed by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
11/30/1999Comments of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P., filed by B. Ferris.2
11/30/1999Initial comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P., filed by J. Stewart and L. Lauridsen.2
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (47 pgs.)47
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (17 pgs.)17
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom Communi- cations by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (29 pgs.)29
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (18 pgs.)18
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (14 pgs.)14
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating. (14 pgs.)14
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.)11
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Cellnet of Ohio by R. Hart. (10 pgs.)10
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of Virtual Business Communications by M. Christensen. (7 pgs.)7
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of the New Knoxville Telephone Co. by M. Christensen. (7 pgs.)7
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of Alltel Communications, Alltel Ohio, and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
11/30/1999Separate initial comments filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)3
11/30/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company by L. Lauridsen. (2 pgs.)2
11/30/1999Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.)2
11/30/1999Letter stating that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association will not be filing initial comments at this time, but reserves the right to file reply comments, filed by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
11/30/1999Letter stating that Toledo Area Telecommunications Services will not be filing initial comments at this time, but re- serves the right to file reply comments, filed by W. New- comb. (1 pg.)1
10/29/1999Service Notice32
10/28/1999Entry ordering that all interested stakeholders are invited to file initial and reply comments to the staff's proposal, which is attached to this entry, by November 30 and Decem- ber 21, 1999, respectively; that a conference be held from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on November 15, 1999, at the Commis- sion offices, in order to allow interested persons to ask the staff questions to gain a better understanding of the staff's proposal and rationale. (67 pgs.)67
09/21/1999Reply comments of MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and D. McGann.11
05/06/1999In the matter of the Commission Review of the Regulatory Framework for Competitive Telecommunication Services under Chapter 4927, Revised Code.1