| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 06/04/2002 | Entry ordering that the complainants' application for rehearing, as well as their request for an additional hearing on the cost/revenue impact of EAS in this case, are both denied in their entirety and further ordered that OCC is granted leave to file its a micus memo, submitted in this case on 5/2/02. | 7 |
| 06/04/2002 | Service notice. | 4 |
| 05/21/2002 | Entry granting the application for rehearing filed by the complainants for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing. | 3 |
| 05/21/2002 | Service Notice. | 4 |
| 05/10/2002 | Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra OCC'S motion for leave to file AMICUS Memorandum filed by C. Rawlings. | 7 |
| 05/02/2002 | Motion to file amicus memorandum in support of application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 15 |
| 05/02/2002 | Memorandum contra the complainants' application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. | 8 |
| 04/22/2002 | Application for rehearing, the subscribers of the Middletown exchange of Ameritech Ohio. | 19 |
| 03/21/2002 | Supplemental Finding & Order ordering that the request for EAS between the Middletown Exchange and the Cincinnati and Hamilton exchanges is denied due to the Commission's inability, due to federal constraints, to enforce the state remedy found to be warranted, i.e., a grant of two-way, measured-rate EAS between the involved exchanges; that this case be dismissed and closed of record. | 5 |
| 03/21/2002 | Service notice | 4 |
| 10/10/2001 | Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. | 10 |
| 09/25/2001 | Update of May 9, 2001 motion of numerous subscribers of the Middletown exchange, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Nunlist. | 4 |
| 06/01/2001 | Reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra of May 25, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Nunlist. | 4 |
| 05/25/2001 | Memorandum contra motion of numerous subscribers of the Middletown exchange for the Commission to grant flat rate EAS service between the Middletown exchange and the Hamilton and Cincinnati exchanges, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. | 7 |
| 05/10/2001 | Motion of numerous subscribers of the Middletown exchange for the Commission to grant flat rate EAS service between the Middletown exchange and the Hamilton and Cincinnati exchanges filed by R. Nunlist. | 22 |
| 08/19/1999 | Entry denying the complainants' application for rehearing in its entirety. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 08/13/1999 | Letter supporting the Commission's 6/22/99 decision filed by D. Marshall. (1 pg) | 1 |
| 08/11/1999 | Entry ordering that Ameritech is granted an extension of 15 days, i.e., until September 7, 1999, to file its appli- cation for LATA modification with the FCC. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 08/10/1999 | Reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra of July 31, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Nunlist. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 07/30/1999 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on be- half of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (16 pgs.) | 16 |
| 07/30/1999 | Motion for an extension of tiem to seek a LATA boundary modification from the Federal Communications Commission, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Raw- lings. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 07/21/1999 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by R. Nunlist. (20 pgs.) | 20 |
| 06/22/1999 | Finding & Order approving the stipulation in its entirety; that, upon condition of securing an appropriate LATA modi- fication from the FCC, Ameritech and CBT shall provide two- way, measured-rate EAS between the Middletown Exchange and the cincinnait and Hamilton Exchanges; that CBT's motion for protective order is granted as described in Finding 7; that the Commission's docketing division shall maintain under seal for 18 months from the date of this order the un- redacted version of CBT's July 18, 1998 informational re- sponse. (25 pgs.) | 25 |
| 12/23/1998 | Stipulation and agreement filed on behalf of complainants by M. Nunlist; and respondents, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison; and Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings. (19 pgs.) | 19 |
| 07/10/1998 | Information response regarding cost data, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (14 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 14 |
| 07/10/1998 | Amended motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 07/10/1998 | Testimony of Evelyn W. King regarding cost data filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 07/10/1998 | Information response regarding cost data, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 07/10/1998 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (25 pgs.) | 25 |
| 06/25/1998 | Entry rescheduling the prehearing conference at 1:00 p.m. on July 13, 1998, at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/12/1998 | Answer and information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (50 pgs.) | 50 |
| 06/12/1998 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (58 pgs.) | 58 |
| 06/12/1998 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 05/28/1998 | Affidavit stating that LCIhas submitted the required infor- mation to the designated local exchange companies filed by K. Logue. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 05/19/1998 | Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders filed on behalf of MCI Tele- communications Corp. by J. Sanders. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/12/1998 | Affidavit of Kenton J. Pfister filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by K. Pfister. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
| 05/08/1998 | Affidavit of LaTrischa Miles on behalf of Sprint Communica- tions company L.P. (2 pgs) | 2 |
| 04/24/1998 | Letter stating that WorldCom Technologies, Inc. respectfully requests it not be required to provide the distribution of calling statistics for its customers in the instant pro- ceedings, filed by B. Ferris (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 04/03/1998 | Entry ordering that the 3/9/98 entry in this case be amended to reflect the corrections noted in this entry. (DF)(2 pgs) | 2 |
| 03/11/1998 | Entry ordering that AT&T, CBLD, LCI, U.S. Sprint, and World- com, Inc,shall provide,on or before 5/12/98,the information and affidavits required under Findings 6 and 7; ordered that Ameritech and Cincinnati Bell file their answers or other pleadings and the information required by Finding 9 by 6/12/98; that Ameritech and Cincinnati Bell provide the information required in Finding 10 by 7/10/98;that parties comply with Finding 11;settlement conference be scheduled for 10:00 a.m. 6/25/97 at the Commission offices. (DF) (7 pgs.) (FILED 3/9/98) | 7 |
| 03/02/1998 | In the matter of the petition of Richard A. Nunlist and subscribers of the Middletown exchange for extended area service into the Cincinnati exchanges of Ameritech Ohio and Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. (8 pgs.) | 8 |