DIS - Case Record for 98-0308-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-0308-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: TIME WARNER/AMERITECH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 2/18/1998
Date Closed: 5/5/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/15/1999Transmittal Papers. (8 pgs)8
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
08/18/1999Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (7 pgs.)7
08/02/1999Supreme Court Papers. (8 pgs.) (S.C. 399-1242)8
07/02/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (34 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1242)34
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry on rehearing denying the application for rehearing by Ameritech; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding (19).14
04/02/1999Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for oral argument filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom by L. Reardon. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (84 pgs.)84
03/29/1999Response to initial comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio concerning the FCC declaratory ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (35 pgs.)35
03/29/1999Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio,b y M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (58 pgs.)58
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.)30
03/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (47 pgs.)47
03/05/1999Entry ordering that comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on March 19, 1999; reply comments are to be filed by March 29, 1999. (AE) (3 pgs.) Service notice 2 pgs.3
03/01/1999Statement of position in response to the declaratory ruling of The Federal Communications Commission filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom by M. Schermer. (41 pgs.)41
02/26/1999Motion for leave to file comments and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
02/05/1999Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (15 pgs.)15
12/10/1998Entry ordering that the rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission more time to consider the arguments raised in the application for rehearing. (2 pgs.)2
11/23/1998Memorandum of Time Warner Communications of Ohio in opposi- tion to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by R. Sugarman. (19 pgs.)19
11/23/1998Opposition to application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
11/13/1998Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by D. Con- away and M. Mulcahy. (53 pgs)53
10/22/1998Notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
10/14/1998Opinion & Order denying Ameritech's motion to dismiss this matter; that Time Warner's complaint against Ameritech is sustained; that Ameritech pay to Time Warner reciprocal com- pensation payments as directed in this order. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Donald L. Mason. (13 pgs.)13
10/13/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Kahn and D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.)3
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
09/18/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of com- plainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (63 pgs.)63
09/04/1998Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugarman. (42 pgs.)42
09/04/1998Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.)30
08/21/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (11 pgs.)11
08/11/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (8 pgs.)8
08/06/1998Memorandum in support of Time Warners motion for consoli- dation, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (3 pgs.)3
08/04/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum in opposition to motion to consolidate of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Reply of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority, filed by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
07/29/1998Response to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
07/27/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
07/22/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (32 pgs.)32
07/21/1998Motion to consolidate and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
06/26/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (62 pgs.)62
05/22/1998Initial brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (67 pgs.)67
05/22/1998Initial brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (52 pgs.)52
05/22/1998Brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
05/14/1998Entry ordering that TCG Ohio be granted amicus curiae status in this proceeding. (AE) (1 pg.)1
04/28/1998Entry ordering that initial briefs be filed on May 22, 1998, and reply briefs eight calendar days after the Commission issues its opinion and order in ICG Telecom Group (vs) Ameritech Ohio, Case No. 97-1557-TP-CSS. (AE) (1 pg.)1
04/20/1998Reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.)8
04/15/1998Motion for limited intervention and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
04/13/1998Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner Communications of Ohio, by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (25 pgs.)25
04/03/1998Notice of withdrawing the Motion for Protective Order filed 3/36/98 filed on behalf of Ameritech by M. Stemm. (1 pg)1
03/26/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (47 pgs.)47
03/26/1998Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.)8
03/26/1998Reply to Ameritech Ohio's answer and affirmative defenses filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugar- man and M. Schermer. (3 pgs.)3
03/12/1998Ameritech Ohio's Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by D. Conway. (14 pgs)14
02/27/1998Entry scheduling a settlement conference at 9:30 a.m. on April 9, 1998, at the Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach a settlement at the April 9, 1998 conference, the parties shall meet with the attorney ex- aminer at the conclusion of the conference to discuss several procedural matters. (AE) (2 pgs)2
02/20/1998Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)1
02/18/1998In the matter of the complaint of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. versus Ameritech Ohio filed by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (316 pgs)316